Secondary service connection

Migraine secondary to PTSD: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2017 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided migraine claimed as secondary to PTSD in 1,732 decisions. It granted the issue in 37.1% of them, above the 30.7% grant rate for all migraine issues, denied it in 8.8%, and remanded it in 52.6%. Counting only decisions on the merits, 80.9% were granted.

From Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions: appeals, not VA's first decisions. About these numbers

Decisions

1,732

2017–2026

Granted

37.1%

All migraine: 30.7%

Granted on the merits

80.9%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

52.6%

Denied: 8.8%

At a glance

  • Most often argued link: stress, named in 181 issues, 63.0% granted. Details
  • Causation only: 41.3% granted; when the decision discussed aggravation: 30.3%. Details
  • Positive nexus opinion: 97.1% granted on the merits when in the record, 56.9% without. Details
  • Private medical opinion: 90.5% granted on the merits when in the record, 65.2% without. Details
  • Issues granted: 21.7% in 2017, 36.4% in 2026. Details

How these claims are argued

A secondary claim says PTSD caused migraine or made it worse, and names how. Below: whether the Board's decision discussed aggravation, and the medical link each decision names, with how often those issues were granted.

Aggravation discussed

made worse by the disability, 3.310(b)

30.3%

granted, of 676 issues (38.9% of all)

Causation only

caused by the disability, 3.310(a)

41.3%

granted, of 1,063 issues (61.1% of all)

Medical link namedIssuesGranted

Stress

Granted “VA examiner opined migraines at least as likely as not due to PTSD-related stress” 26000465 (2026)

Denied “The Board noted that while migraines can be triggered by stress, no causal link between psychiatric illness and migraines has been established in medical literature.” A25021048 (2025)

18163.0%

Sleep disruption

Granted “Service connection for headaches was granted as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected PTSD, persistent depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and insomnia.” 26001880 (2026)

5162.7%

Medication side effects

Granted “Service connection for migraines is granted as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected PTSD with alcohol and opioid use disorder in remission.” A25098547 (2025)

1741.2%

Weight gain or obesity

Denied “The Veteran sought service connection for migraines as secondary to his service-connected PTSD, with obesity as an intermediate step.” A24086560 (2024)

100.0%

Based on words in the AI-written summary and reasons for each issue, not a reading of the full decision. 15.0% of the 1,739 issues name at least one medical link; the rest only say “secondary to” the disability. One issue can name several links. Granted is the share of those issues granted (remands count as not granted). A link named in a denial was often the argument the Board rejected.

Evidence in granted and denied migraine decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the migraine issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion58797.1%56.9%+40.2 pts
Private medical opinion76590.5%65.2%+25.2 pts
Favorable VA exam27393.9%76.6%+17.2 pts
Buddy statement7085.7%80.7%+5.0 pts
Combat service16684.1%80.5%+3.6 pts
Treating physician opinion9982.6%80.7%+1.9 pts
Lay statement1,40278.1%94.8%−16.7 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 73.9% of the decisions that granted migraine.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 28.6% of grants and 13.8% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often migraine was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion1,11978.1%86.4%−8.3 pts
Unfavorable VA exam1,40978.6%93.4%−14.8 pts

Recent migraine decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26040383A. Jaeger · 2026

Private physician's opinion found causal and aggravating relationship between PTSD/tinnitus and migraines.; VA treatment records and co-worker corroborated reports of headaches/migraines.; Resolving doubt in Veteran's favor due to conflicting medical opinions.

Citation Nr. A26036912L. M. Barnard · 2026

Credible testimony of stress-triggered headaches; Consistent with service-connected PTSD/alcohol use disorder; Benefit of the doubt applied

Citation Nr. A26037110Kristy L. Zadora · 2026

Private opinion linked migraines to tinnitus and PTSD; Opinion cited shared physiological/psychological pathways; No contrary VA opinion on secondary connection

Denied

Citation Nr. A26040339B.T. Knope · 2026

Service records did not establish chronic headaches or onset during service; Significant gap between separation and first treatment for headaches; Post-service records reflect denial or absence of headaches

Citation Nr. 26004269Paulette Vance Burton · 2026

No objective evidence of in-service onset or continuity of symptoms.; Multiple negative nexus opinions from VA examiners.; Migraines not listed under Camp Lejeune presumptive conditions.; Correlation between PTSD and migraines, but no causal link to service established.

Citation Nr. A26029270Michael Martin · 2026

Headaches did not meet prostrating attack criteria; Evidence persuasively weighs against compensable rating

Migraine secondary to PTSD: outcomes by year

YearIssues decidedGrantedDeniedRemandedOther
2017
60
21.7%23.3%46.7%8.3%
2018
98
39.8%8.2%45.9%6.1%
2019
164
41.5%7.9%50.0%0.6%
2020
160
39.4%10.6%48.8%1.3%
2021
198
31.3%10.6%56.6%1.5%
2022
164
30.5%9.1%59.8%0.6%
2023
215
34.0%7.9%57.7%0.5%
2024
295
41.0%6.4%50.2%2.4%
2025
286
41.6%7.3%50.7%0.3%
2026
99
36.4%7.1%55.6%1.0%

Each row counts issues (each condition the Board decided), so the shares add up to 100%. Other: dismissed, withdrawn or no clear outcome. Years with fewer than 20 issues are left out.

Why the Board granted or denied migraine

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established60
  2. Caused by the service-connected disability53
  3. Service connection established51
  4. Aggravated by the service-connected disability34
  5. Criteria for service connection met13
  6. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service11
  7. No contrary medical opinion of record9
  8. Secondary to PTSD6

Most common reasons in denials

  1. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service23
  2. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis18
  3. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim11
  4. Service records negative or silent11
  5. Current diagnosis established9
  6. No current diagnosis8
  7. Continuity of symptomatology since service3
  8. Veteran failed to attend scheduled VA examination3

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Background

What VA needs to grant a secondary claim

Secondary service connection means VA disability benefits for a condition caused or made worse by a disability that is already service connected (38 CFR 3.310). The claim needs three things:

  1. A current diagnosis of migraine.
  2. PTSD is already service connected.
  3. Medical evidence linking them (a nexus opinion): migraine was caused by PTSD (3.310(a)), or was made worse beyond its natural progress by it (aggravation, 3.310(b)).

VA's procedures for these claims are in M21-1 V.ii.2.D. When the evidence for and against is about even, VA must decide in the veteran's favor (38 CFR 3.102).

How VA rates migraine

Once service connection is granted, VA assigns a disability rating from the rating schedule, 38 CFR 4.124a, diagnostic code 8100 (Migraine). The rating is the same whether the condition is service connected directly or as secondary to another disability.

RatingCriteria
50%With very frequent completely prostrating and prolonged attacks productive of severe economic inadaptability
30%With characteristic prostrating attacks occurring on an average once a month over last several months
10%With characteristic prostrating attacks averaging one in 2 months over last several months
0%With less frequent attacks
  • Note (1): There may be an overlap of manifestations of conditions evaluated under the table titled “Evaluation Of Cognitive Impairment And Other Residuals Of TBI Not Otherwise Classified” with manifestations of a comorbid mental or neurologic or other physical disorder that can be separately evaluated under another diagnostic code. In such cases, do not assign more than one evaluation based on the same manifestations. If the manifestations of two or more conditions cannot be clearly separated, assign a single evaluation under whichever set of diagnostic criteria allows the better assessment of overall impaired functioning due to both conditions. However, if the manifestations are clearly separable, assign a separate evaluation for each condition.
  • Note (2): Symptoms listed as examples at certain evaluation levels in the table are only examples and are not symptoms that must be present in order to assign a particular evaluation.
  • Note (3): “Instrumental activities of daily living” refers to activities other than self-care that are needed for independent living, such as meal preparation, doing housework and other chores, shopping, traveling, doing laundry, being responsible for one's own medications, and using a telephone. These activities are distinguished from “Activities of daily living,” which refers to basic self-care and includes bathing or showering, dressing, eating, getting in or out of bed or a chair, and using the toilet.
  • Note (4): The terms “mild,” “moderate,” and “severe” TBI, which may appear in medical records, refer to a classification of TBI made at, or close to, the time of injury rather than to the current level of functioning. This classification does not affect the rating assigned under diagnostic code 8045.
  • Note (5): A veteran whose residuals of TBI are rated under a version of § 4.124a, diagnostic code 8045, in effect before October 23, 2008 may request review under diagnostic code 8045, irrespective of whether his or her disability has worsened since the last review. VA will review that veteran's disability rating to determine whether the veteran may be entitled to a higher disability rating under diagnostic code 8045. A request for review pursuant to this note will be treated as a claim for an increased rating for purposes of determining the effective date of an increased rating awarded as a result of such review; however, in no case will the award be effective before October 23, 2008. For the purposes of determining the effective date of an increased rating awarded as a result of such review, VA will apply 38 CFR 3.114, if applicable.
  • Note: The ratings under code 8046 apply only when the diagnosis of cerebral arteriosclerosis is substantiated by the entire clinical picture and not solely on findings of retinal arteriosclerosis.

Text of 38 CFR 4.124a as of Feb 27, 2026. Confirm the current text at the source before relying on it.

See all migraine decisions, direct and secondary.

Other conditions secondary to PTSD

Migraine secondary to other conditions

See all conditions secondary to PTSD.

Rules that apply to secondary migraine claims

Research your migraine case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Counts decisions in which the Board decided a migraine issue claimed as secondary to PTSD, by the outcome of that issue.
  • The primary disability is read from the decision text ("secondary to …") and grouped by name, so spellings such as "PTSD" and "posttraumatic stress disorder" count together.
  • Secondary claims also include aggravation of a non-service-connected condition by a service-connected one (38 CFR 3.310(b)).
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2017–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.

Where this data comes from

  1. Claim
  2. Regional office decides
  3. Veteran appeals
  4. Board decides
  5. Granted · Denied · Remanded: back to the regional office

Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions show how VA's highest review body applies 38 CFR and weighs evidence on contested claims.

Each one is an appeal: a regional office decided the claim first, and the veteran appealed. So these rates describe the Board, not a veteran's odds at the regional office, where most claims are decided and whose decisions are not public.

More on what Board decisions can and cannot tell you