BVA decisions by condition

Migraine: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2017 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a migraine issue in 38,924 decisions. It granted the migraine issue in 30.7% of them, above the 19.4% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 24.9%, and remanded it in 43.0%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 55.2% were granted.

Decisions

38,924

2017–2026

Granted

30.7%

All conditions: 19.4%

Granted on the merits

55.2%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

43.0%

Denied: 24.9%

How VA rates migraine

Once service connection is granted, VA assigns a disability rating from the rating schedule: 38 CFR 4.124a, diagnostic code 8100 (Migraine). The rating is the same whether the condition is service connected directly or as secondary to another disability.

RatingCriteria
50%With very frequent completely prostrating and prolonged attacks productive of severe economic inadaptability
30%With characteristic prostrating attacks occurring on an average once a month over last several months
10%With characteristic prostrating attacks averaging one in 2 months over last several months
0%With less frequent attacks

Text of 38 CFR 4.124a as of Feb 27, 2026. Confirm the current text at the source before relying on it.

Migraine outcomes by year

YearIssues decidedGrantedDeniedRemandedOther
2017
1,941
20.5%28.6%42.1%8.8%
2018
3,539
24.6%27.0%43.3%5.1%
2019
4,419
26.1%25.5%45.6%2.7%
2020
3,998
27.2%27.9%42.6%2.3%
2021
3,818
28.7%25.7%43.0%2.6%
2022
3,693
29.4%21.4%46.5%2.7%
2023
4,461
30.4%21.2%45.8%2.6%
2024
5,387
33.9%22.9%41.0%2.2%
2025
6,403
35.5%25.6%36.9%2.0%
2026
2,363
38.8%22.7%35.6%2.8%

Each row counts issues (each condition the Board decided), so the shares add up to 100%. Other: dismissed, withdrawn or no clear outcome. Years with fewer than 50 issues are left out.

Evidence in granted and denied migraine decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the migraine issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion6,95579.8%47.5%+32.3 pts
Favorable VA exam6,22373.3%49.7%+23.6 pts
Claimed as secondary8,95874.0%51.2%+22.8 pts
Treating physician opinion1,97371.0%54.2%+16.8 pts
Private medical opinion11,86965.6%49.5%+16.1 pts
Buddy statement1,36167.8%54.7%+13.1 pts
Combat service2,18962.4%54.8%+7.6 pts
Lay statement32,45655.3%54.4%+0.9 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 72.9% of the decisions that granted migraine.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 45.6% of grants and 14.1% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often migraine was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion18,46153.1%57.1%−3.9 pts
Unfavorable VA exam29,98054.3%60.3%−6.0 pts

Migraine claimed as a secondary condition

Decisions where migraine was claimed as secondary to another service-connected disability (38 CFR 3.310), by that disability.

Why the Board granted or denied migraine

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established917
  2. Caused by the service-connected disability419
  3. Continuity of symptomatology since service338
  4. Service connection established203
  5. Aggravated by the service-connected disability183
  6. Migraines rated under DC 8100161
  7. Criteria for service connection met153
  8. Severe economic inadaptability148

Most common reasons in denials

  1. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim754
  2. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service705
  3. No current diagnosis529
  4. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis521
  5. Service records negative or silent499
  6. Already at the maximum schedular rating470
  7. Current diagnosis established254
  8. No evidence of severe economic inadaptability122

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent migraine decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26040500Gayle Strommen · 2026

Persian Gulf Veteran status verified by DoD data.; Migraines diagnosed in Oct 2020 VA exam.; Migraines considered qualifying chronic disability under 38 C.F.R. § 3.317.

Citation Nr. A26040617Michael A. Pappas · 2026

Reduction improper due to inadequate VA examinations; Examinations did not reconcile findings with Veteran's reports of frequent incapacitating headaches and missed work; Veteran's testimony and submitted evidence (employer letter, headache log) supported continued 50% rating

Citation Nr. A26040619Colleen M. Glaser-Allen · 2026

Veteran's testimony and lay statements support frequent, prostrating attacks.; Attacks are prolonged and capable of producing severe economic inadaptability.; December 2020 VA exam was inadequate for downplaying frequency and economic impact.

Denied

Citation Nr. A26040479Michelle L. Kane · 2026

Denied as secondary to denied bruxism; No current bruxism established

Citation Nr. A26040532Michelle L. Kane · 2026

Headaches not prostrating or prolonged.; Did not cause severe economic inadaptability.; Did not impact occupational tasks.

Citation Nr. A26040752E. I. Velez · 2026

Veteran already at maximum rating for migraines (50%); Evidence did not support higher rating

Rules that apply to migraine claims

Research your migraine case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a migraine issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2017–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.