Secondary service connection

Intervertebral disc syndrome secondary to a knee condition: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2017 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided intervertebral disc syndrome claimed as secondary to a knee condition in 1,767 decisions. It granted the issue in 19.8% of them, close to the 19.2% grant rate for all intervertebral disc syndrome issues, denied it in 13.0%, and remanded it in 64.7%. Counting only decisions on the merits, 60.4% were granted.

Decisions

1,767

2017–2026

Granted

19.8%

All intervertebral disc syndrome: 19.2%

Granted on the merits

60.4%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

64.7%

Denied: 13.0%

See all intervertebral disc syndrome decisions, direct and secondary.

Intervertebral disc syndrome secondary to a knee condition: outcomes by year

YearIssues decidedGrantedDeniedRemandedOther
2017
107
8.4%21.5%55.1%15.0%
2018
184
15.2%17.4%64.7%2.7%
2019
213
16.4%9.4%71.4%2.8%
2020
207
18.4%16.9%62.8%1.9%
2021
214
17.8%13.6%66.8%1.9%
2022
198
13.6%10.1%74.2%2.0%
2023
217
20.3%11.1%66.8%1.8%
2024
207
26.6%7.7%64.7%1.0%
2025
162
32.7%13.6%52.5%1.2%
2026
79
30.4%13.9%54.4%1.3%

Each row counts issues (each condition the Board decided), so the shares add up to 100%. Other: dismissed, withdrawn or no clear outcome. Years with fewer than 20 issues are left out.

Evidence in granted and denied intervertebral disc syndrome decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the intervertebral disc syndrome issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion44891.8%28.8%+62.9 pts
Private medical opinion71074.0%39.1%+34.9 pts
Favorable VA exam17778.3%56.4%+21.9 pts
Treating physician opinion10878.7%58.3%+20.4 pts
Buddy statement4276.9%60.1%+16.9 pts
Combat service4656.3%60.6%−4.3 pts
Lay statement1,44055.3%85.0%−29.7 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 79.4% of the decisions that granted intervertebral disc syndrome.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 23.7% of grants and 14.4% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often intervertebral disc syndrome was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Unfavorable VA exam1,45958.8%73.1%−14.3 pts
Negative nexus opinion1,22057.0%72.2%−15.2 pts

How these claims are argued

A secondary claim says a knee condition caused intervertebral disc syndrome or made it worse, and names how. Below: whether the Board's decision discussed aggravation, and the medical link each decision names, with how often those issues were granted.

Aggravation discussed

made worse by the disability, 3.310(b)

11.5%

granted, of 859 issues (48.0% of all)

Causation only

caused by the disability, 3.310(a)

27.1%

granted, of 929 issues (52.0% of all)

Medical link namedIssuesGranted

Altered gait or overuse

Granted “The veteran reported pain and functional impairment, and a private orthopedist opined that the knee condition altered gait and posture, leading to back pain.” A26000574 (2026)

Denied “no chronic gait alteration documented..” 26001600 (2026)

41336.1%

Nerve involvement

Granted “Service connection for lumbar strain with bilateral lower extremity radiculitis and lumbar facet spondylitis was granted on a secondary basis to service-connected left and right knee joint osteoarthritis.” 25005767 (2025)

Denied “Service connection for a low back disorder, including DDD, lumbosacral strain, and lumbar radiculopathy, was denied.” A26009303 (2026)

5843.1%

Weight gain or obesity

Granted “VA examiner opined back disability less likely than not related to service-connected left knee disability, citing age and obesity.” A25013105 (2025)

Denied “Diagnosed back conditions are more likely due to age, obesity, and lack of in-service injury.” 24025475 (2024)

5318.9%

Chronic pain

Granted “The Veteran claimed his back pain resulted from an antalgic gait caused by his knee pain.” A26005289 (2026)

Denied “No functional impairment of earning capacity due to pain” 19156765 (2019)

3537.1%

Stress

Granted “The Board found that the veteran's service-connected knee and foot conditions caused abnormal biomechanical stressors in the spine, leading to these lumbar conditions.” A24022983 (2024)

1258.3%

Based on words in the AI-written summary and reasons for each issue, not a reading of the full decision. 29.4% of the 1,788 issues name at least one medical link; the rest only say “secondary to” the disability. One issue can name several links. Granted is the share of those issues granted (remands count as not granted). A link named in a denial was often the argument the Board rejected.

Why the Board granted or denied intervertebral disc syndrome

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Caused by the service-connected disability61
  2. Service connection established31
  3. Current diagnosis established29
  4. Aggravated by the service-connected disability21
  5. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service11
  6. Criteria for service connection met6
  7. New and material evidence received to reopen claim4
  8. New and material evidence received3

Most common reasons in denials

  1. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service41
  2. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis37
  3. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim32
  4. Service records negative or silent23
  5. Aggravated by the service-connected disability18
  6. Caused by the service-connected disability9
  7. No continuity of symptomatology7
  8. Continuity of symptomatology since service6

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent intervertebral disc syndrome decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26039145Matthew W. Blackwelder · 2026

Conflicting medical opinions regarding nexus; VA examiner: less likely than not related to knee condition; Private provider: at least as likely as not related to knee condition; Board found private opinion more probative due to rationale and consistency

Citation Nr. A26037707B. D. Watson · 2026

VA opinion inadequate for failing to address aggravation; Private treatment note persuasive regarding gait changes exacerbating back pain; Veteran testimony supported gait strain on lower back; Evidence in approximate balance, doubt resolved in Veteran's favor

Citation Nr. A26036913Tanya Smith · 2026

Current disability documented in VA treatment records; Persuasive private medical opinion linking back condition to service-connected knee disabilities; Opinion stated it is more likely than not the back pain is due to in-service injury and knee replacement

Denied

Citation Nr. A26037649M. M. Celli · 2026

No causal relationship to service or service-connected knee disabilities.; Onset of back pain reported years after service.; No in-service event or diagnosis for back disorder.

Citation Nr. A26024687S. Heneks · 2026

Contemporaneous medical evidence more probative than later statements; VA examiner opinions found less likely than not related to service/aggravated by knee disability; Lengthy period between service and symptom onset weighs against claim

Citation Nr. 26002587E. I. Velez · 2026

Failure to attend VA examination without good cause; Service treatment records silent for back complaints/diagnoses; No evidence of nexus to service or secondary service connection

What VA needs to grant a secondary claim

Secondary service connection means VA disability benefits for a condition caused or made worse by a disability that is already service connected (38 CFR 3.310). The claim needs three things:

  1. A current diagnosis of intervertebral disc syndrome.
  2. A knee condition is already service connected.
  3. Medical evidence linking them (a nexus opinion): intervertebral disc syndrome was caused by a knee condition (3.310(a)), or was made worse beyond its natural progress by it (aggravation, 3.310(b)).

VA's procedures for these claims are in M21-1 V.ii.2.D. When the evidence for and against is about even, VA must decide in the veteran's favor (38 CFR 3.102).

Other conditions secondary to a knee condition

Intervertebral disc syndrome secondary to other conditions

See all conditions secondary to a knee condition or back conditions as a primary or secondary condition.

Rules that apply to secondary intervertebral disc syndrome claims

Research your intervertebral disc syndrome case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Counts decisions in which the Board decided a intervertebral disc syndrome issue claimed as secondary to a knee condition, by the outcome of that issue.
  • The primary disability is read from the decision text ("secondary to …") and grouped by name, so spellings such as "PTSD" and "posttraumatic stress disorder" count together.
  • Secondary claims also include aggravation of a non-service-connected condition by a service-connected one (38 CFR 3.310(b)).
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2017–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.