Secondary service connection

Ankle impairment secondary to a knee condition: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2017 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided ankle impairment claimed as secondary to a knee condition in 955 decisions. It granted the issue in 15.2% of them, below the 17.8% grant rate for all ankle impairment issues, denied it in 16.5%, and remanded it in 67.7%. Counting only decisions on the merits, 47.9% were granted.

Decisions

955

2017–2026

Granted

15.2%

All ankle impairment: 17.8%

Granted on the merits

47.9%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

67.7%

Denied: 16.5%

See all ankle impairment decisions, direct and secondary.

Ankle impairment secondary to a knee condition: outcomes by year

YearIssues decidedGrantedDeniedRemandedOther
2017
85
11.8%30.6%49.4%8.2%
2018
99
12.1%22.2%65.7%0.0%
2019
140
16.4%16.4%64.3%2.9%
2020
125
7.2%16.0%76.8%0.0%
2021
146
15.8%15.8%67.8%0.7%
2022
129
11.6%14.0%74.4%0.0%
2023
170
14.1%11.8%74.1%0.0%
2024
131
13.0%12.2%74.0%0.8%
2025
123
19.5%20.3%60.2%0.0%
2026
44
36.4%13.6%50.0%0.0%

Each row counts issues (each condition the Board decided), so the shares add up to 100%. Other: dismissed, withdrawn or no clear outcome. Years with fewer than 20 issues are left out.

Evidence in granted and denied ankle impairment decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the ankle impairment issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion18888.2%21.7%+66.5 pts
Private medical opinion29270.1%29.5%+40.6 pts
Favorable VA exam11376.1%39.8%+36.3 pts
Treating physician opinion5176.5%44.2%+32.2 pts
Lay statement79745.2%65.0%−19.8 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 80.7% of the decisions that granted ankle impairment.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 29.0% of grants and 10.8% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often ankle impairment was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion65144.3%57.3%−13.0 pts
Unfavorable VA exam78545.8%61.0%−15.2 pts

How these claims are argued

A secondary claim says a knee condition caused ankle impairment or made it worse, and names how. Below: whether the Board's decision discussed aggravation, and the medical link each decision names, with how often those issues were granted.

Aggravation discussed

made worse by the disability, 3.310(b)

5.0%

granted, of 498 issues (41.8% of all)

Causation only

caused by the disability, 3.310(a)

21.3%

granted, of 694 issues (58.2% of all)

Medical link namedIssuesGranted

Altered gait or overuse

Granted “Opinions link left ankle condition to service-connected spinal and right knee issues and altered gait.” A26008103 (2026)

Denied “The claim that the ankle condition is due to the service-connected left knee is contradicted by evidence of a normal gait and lack of association between the knee and ankle pain.” A26026839 (2026)

21723.5%

Weight gain or obesity

Denied “The Veteran claimed it was secondary to his service-connected left knee disability, but the VA examiner opined it was less likely than not caused or aggravated by the left knee, attributing the ankle issues to morbid obesity.” A24035001 (2024)

400.0%

Chronic pain

Granted “The veteran's altered gait due to knee pain likely caused the left ankle defect.” A25077064 (2025)

Denied “Appellant did not mention pain interfering with ministry..” A25005724 (2025)

238.7%

Stress

Granted “While direct service connection was denied due to lack of evidence of an in-service ankle injury, the Board found the left ankle disability to be secondary to the Veteran's service-connected right knee disability, citing medical...” A26037161 (2026)

10100.0%

Based on words in the AI-written summary and reasons for each issue, not a reading of the full decision. 23.2% of the 1,192 issues name at least one medical link; the rest only say “secondary to” the disability. One issue can name several links. Granted is the share of those issues granted (remands count as not granted). A link named in a denial was often the argument the Board rejected.

Why the Board granted or denied ankle impairment

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Caused by the service-connected disability35
  2. Current diagnosis established22
  3. Service connection established15
  4. Aggravated by the service-connected disability5
  5. VA examiner opinion inadequate2
  6. Resolving all doubt in veteran's favor2
  7. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service2
  8. Private opinion found probative2

Most common reasons in denials

  1. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service32
  2. No current diagnosis22
  3. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim20
  4. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis14
  5. Aggravated by the service-connected disability13
  6. Service records negative or silent13
  7. Caused by the service-connected disability7
  8. Current diagnosis established6

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent ankle impairment decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26040035Jonathan B. Kramer · 2026

Service-connected bilateral knee and low back disabilities established.; Private and VA opinions found bilateral ankle disability aggravated by service-connected knee/back conditions.; Opinions cited biomechanical relationship and overcompensation.

Citation Nr. A26037161B. D. Watson · 2026

No direct service connection for left ankle sprain.; Secondary service connection granted based on right knee disability.; Benefit of the doubt applied to link ankle disability to knee injury.

Citation Nr. A26033063Michael J. Skaltsounis · 2026

Current disability conceded by AOJ; Service-connected left knee disability established; Private medical opinion found favorable nexus

Denied

Citation Nr. 26004344Michael Lane · 2026

Evidence persuasively against service connection; Lack of nexus to service-connected knee and feet disability

Citation Nr. A26026839K.A. Kennerly · 2026

No current ankle disability or functional impairment.; No evidence of in-service complaints or diagnoses.; Claim of secondary ankle condition due to left knee is contradicted by evidence.

Citation Nr. A26025527John Z. Jones · 2026

No evidence of current disability for right ankle; Lack of service treatment records or post-service medical records; Veteran's statements insufficient to trigger duty to assist

What VA needs to grant a secondary claim

Secondary service connection means VA disability benefits for a condition caused or made worse by a disability that is already service connected (38 CFR 3.310). The claim needs three things:

  1. A current diagnosis of ankle impairment.
  2. A knee condition is already service connected.
  3. Medical evidence linking them (a nexus opinion): ankle impairment was caused by a knee condition (3.310(a)), or was made worse beyond its natural progress by it (aggravation, 3.310(b)).

VA's procedures for these claims are in M21-1 V.ii.2.D. When the evidence for and against is about even, VA must decide in the veteran's favor (38 CFR 3.102).

Other conditions secondary to a knee condition

Ankle impairment secondary to other conditions

See all conditions secondary to a knee condition or ankle conditions as a primary or secondary condition.

Rules that apply to secondary ankle impairment claims

Research your ankle impairment case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Counts decisions in which the Board decided a ankle impairment issue claimed as secondary to a knee condition, by the outcome of that issue.
  • The primary disability is read from the decision text ("secondary to …") and grouped by name, so spellings such as "PTSD" and "posttraumatic stress disorder" count together.
  • Secondary claims also include aggravation of a non-service-connected condition by a service-connected one (38 CFR 3.310(b)).
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2017–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.