BVA decisions by condition

PTSD: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2017 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a PTSD issue in 80,784 decisions. It granted the PTSD issue in 29.5% of them, above the 19.4% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 27.8%, and remanded it in 39.0%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 51.6% were granted.

From Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions: appeals, not VA's first decisions. Issue-level outcomes.

Decisions

80,784

2017–2026

Granted

29.5%

All conditions: 19.4%

Granted on the merits

51.6%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

39.0%

Denied: 27.8%

At a glance

  • Positive nexus opinion: 75.8% granted on the merits when in the record, 44.1% without. Details
  • Favorable VA exam: 72.9% granted on the merits when in the record, 44.3% without. Details
  • Issues granted: 16.5% in 2017, 42.5% in 2026. Details

Evidence in granted and denied PTSD decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the PTSD issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion14,58775.8%44.1%+31.7 pts
Favorable VA exam14,33072.9%44.3%+28.6 pts
Buddy statement4,15371.2%50.4%+20.8 pts
Claimed as secondary2,60169.1%51.3%+17.9 pts
Treating physician opinion8,66265.9%49.2%+16.7 pts
Combat service14,66263.0%48.5%+14.5 pts
Private medical opinion26,96959.6%46.4%+13.2 pts
Lay statement68,94751.7%50.4%+1.3 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 73.0% of the decisions that granted PTSD.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 46.3% of grants and 14.3% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often PTSD was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion27,12347.1%53.9%−6.8 pts
Unfavorable VA exam56,79148.4%65.6%−17.2 pts

Recent PTSD decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26040453Michael Martin · 2026

Veteran's service records confirm Vietnam service and meritorious award related to hostile operations.; Veteran's reports of stressful events deemed consistent with service and credible.; RO conceded a stressor based on Vietnam service.; Private psychiatric evaluation diagnosed PTSD under DSM-5 criteria and linked it to in-service trauma.; Board resolved reasonable doubt in Veteran's favor to grant PTSD.

Citation Nr. A26040467David Gratz · 2026

Reduction improper as AOJ failed to demonstrate actual improvement in ability to function; Competent and credible evidence weighed against finding material improvement; Restoration of prior rating warranted due to VA's failure to meet burden of proof

Citation Nr. A26040477J. T. Hutcheson · 2026

AOJ favorable finding of conceded stressor; Prior PTSD diagnoses in VA treatment records; Private psychological evaluation opined nexus to military stressors; Veteran's statements corroborated combat events; Evidence in equipoise regarding onset during service; Benefit of the doubt applied

Denied

Citation Nr. 26005108William H. Donnelly · 2026

Symptoms prior to June 3, 2014, did not more closely approximate criteria for a rating higher than 50 percent.; Symptoms from June 3, 2014, to January 6, 2017, warranted a 70 percent rating, but not higher.; Symptoms from April 13, 2018, to June 30, 2022, warranted a 70 percent rating, but not higher.; Symptoms since November 14, 2022, warranted a 70 percent rating, but not higher.

Citation Nr. A26040554Delyvonne M. Whitehead · 2026

Symptoms did not meet criteria for 50% rating; Veteran generally functioned satisfactorily; Medication and therapy improved symptoms

Citation Nr. A26040588Steven D. Reiss · 2026

Symptoms more closely approximate occupational and social impairment with deficiencies in most areas.; Evidence persuasively against total occupational and social impairment.; Criteria for 100 percent rating are overwhelmingly absent.

PTSD outcomes by year

YearIssues decidedGrantedDeniedRemandedOther
2017
5,950
16.5%28.5%35.9%19.2%
2018
10,542
23.1%26.4%42.3%8.2%
2019
11,203
24.9%27.6%43.6%3.9%
2020
9,744
27.4%28.3%40.5%3.8%
2021
8,543
30.7%27.2%37.7%4.4%
2022
8,442
30.7%23.1%41.8%4.3%
2023
9,112
31.1%24.5%40.1%4.3%
2024
8,898
35.1%27.9%33.3%3.8%
2025
8,091
34.6%33.8%28.3%3.3%
2026
2,986
42.5%29.9%24.4%3.2%

Each row counts issues (each condition the Board decided), so the shares add up to 100%. Other: dismissed, withdrawn or no clear outcome. Years with fewer than 50 issues are left out.

Why the Board granted or denied PTSD

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established1,226
  2. Symptoms approximated 70% rating criteria356
  3. Occupational and social impairment with deficiencies in most areas337
  4. Symptoms met criteria for 70% rating218
  5. Symptoms approximated 70% criteria207
  6. Symptoms approximated criteria for 70% rating206
  7. Holistic analysis of symptoms considered200
  8. Symptoms approximated total occupational and social impairment181

Most common reasons in denials

  1. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim2,008
  2. No current diagnosis1,675
  3. Service records negative or silent605
  4. Symptoms did not meet criteria for 100% rating400
  5. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service348
  6. Current diagnosis established337
  7. Symptoms did not meet criteria for 70% rating315
  8. No gross impairment in thought processes or communication261

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

How the Board rates PTSD

The Board decided 46,604 PTSD rating issues from 2017 to 2026: it granted a higher rating in 31%, denied one in 33% and sent 30% back for a new exam or more records.

By diagnostic code

The codes the Board rated PTSD under, most used first. “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands. The last column is the percent the Board assigned most often when it granted a higher rating.

CodeIssuesGranted on the meritsRemandedMost common rating
9411Posttraumatic stress disorder6,20647.3%1.7%70% (63% of grants)
94349457.6%1.1%70% (69% of grants)
73196142.1%31.1%70% (89% of grants)
80455050.0%32.0%70% (47% of grants)
94354660.5%8.7%70% (64% of grants)
94004560.0%0.0%70% (67% of grants)
94134164.1%2.4%70% (60% of grants)

39,604 issues named no diagnostic code, most of them remands.

Ratings the Board assigned

Share of each percent among the 10,465 grants that stated one.

  • 10%0.1%
  • 30%1.5%
  • 40%0.0%
  • 50%13.9%
  • 70%61.4%
  • 100%23.0%

Why the Board granted a higher rating

  • benefit of the doubt / evidence in equipoise4,455
  • criteria for a higher rating not met1,742
  • criteria for the rating met or more nearly approximated1,622
  • symptoms approximated 70 percent rating criteria395
  • occupational and social impairment with deficiencies in most areas328
  • symptoms approximated criteria for 70 percent rating242

Why the Board denied one

  • criteria for a higher rating not met7,063
  • benefit of the doubt / evidence in equipoise367
  • criteria for the rating met or more nearly approximated278
  • no gross impairment in thought processes or communication259
  • preponderance of evidence against higher rating202
  • no current diagnosis of ptsd151

Evidence in rating grants and denials

How often the Board granted a higher PTSD rating on the merits when the decision mentioned each kind of evidence, against decisions that did not. Associations, not causes.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Favorable VA exam7,61065.1%43.0%+22.1 pts
Treating physician opinion5,11757.9%46.2%+11.8 pts
Private medical opinion14,79953.7%44.4%+9.3 pts
Lay statement37,79648.3%43.1%+5.2 pts
In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Unfavorable VA exam33,48946.3%57.4%−11.0 pts

The Board applied the benefit of the doubt (38 CFR 3.102) in 69.8% of the decisions that granted a higher rating.

Recent rating decisions

Higher rating granted

Citation Nr. A2604046770% · David Gratz · 2026

Reduction improper as AOJ failed to demonstrate actual improvement in ability to function; Competent and credible evidence weighed against finding material improvement; Restoration of prior rating warranted due to VA's failure to meet burden of proof

Citation Nr. A26040748Nathaniel Doan · 2026

Credible and corroborated MST report; MST occurred in line of duty during inactive duty for training; Etiologically related to PTSD and depression

Citation Nr. A2604090170% · Marcus N. Fulton · 2026

Private DBQ documented significant impairment; Symptoms approximated 70% rating criteria; Did not meet 100% rating criteria

Denied

Citation Nr. A26040554Delyvonne M. Whitehead · 2026

Symptoms did not meet criteria for 50% rating; Veteran generally functioned satisfactorily; Medication and therapy improved symptoms

Citation Nr. 26005108William H. Donnelly · 2026

Symptoms prior to June 3, 2014, did not more closely approximate criteria for a rating higher than 50 percent.; Symptoms from June 3, 2014, to January 6, 2017, warranted a 70 percent rating, but not higher.; Symptoms from April 13, 2018, to June 30, 2022, warranted a 70 percent rating, but not higher.; Symptoms since November 14, 2022, warranted a 70 percent rating, but not higher.

Citation Nr. A26040588Steven D. Reiss · 2026

Symptoms more closely approximate occupational and social impairment with deficiencies in most areas.; Evidence persuasively against total occupational and social impairment.; Criteria for 100 percent rating are overwhelmingly absent.

How VA rates PTSD

Once service connection is granted, VA assigns a disability rating from the rating schedule, 38 CFR 4.130. Posttraumatic stress disorder (diagnostic code 9411) is rated under the General Rating Formula for Mental Disorders, the same scale as every other mental disorder code. The rating is the same whether the condition is service connected directly or as secondary to another disability.

RatingCriteria
100%Total occupational and social impairment, due to such symptoms as: gross impairment in thought processes or communication; persistent delusions or hallucinations; grossly inappropriate behavior; persistent danger of hurting self or others; intermittent inability to perform activities of daily living (including maintenance of minimal personal hygiene); disorientation to time or place; memory loss for names of close relatives, own occupation, or own name.
70%Occupational and social impairment, with deficiencies in most areas, such as work, school, family relations, judgment, thinking, or mood, due to such symptoms as: suicidal ideation; obsessional rituals which interfere with routine activities; speech intermittently illogical, obscure, or irrelevant; near-continuous panic or depression affecting the ability to function independently, appropriately and effectively; impaired impulse control (such as unprovoked irritability with periods of violence); spatial disorientation; neglect of personal appearance and hygiene; difficulty in adapting to stressful circumstances (including work or a worklike setting); inability to establish and maintain effective relationships.
50%Occupational and social impairment with reduced reliability and productivity due to such symptoms as: flattened affect; circumstantial, circumlocutory, or stereotyped speech; panic attacks more than once a week; difficulty in understanding complex commands; impairment of short- and long-term memory (e.g., retention of only highly learned material, forgetting to complete tasks); impaired judgment; impaired abstract thinking; disturbances of motivation and mood; difficulty in establishing and maintaining effective work and social relationships.
30%Occupational and social impairment with occasional decrease in work efficiency and intermittent periods of inability to perform occupational tasks (although generally functioning satisfactorily, with routine behavior, self-care, and conversation normal), due to such symptoms as: depressed mood, anxiety, suspiciousness, panic attacks (weekly or less often), chronic sleep impairment, mild memory loss (such as forgetting names, directions, recent events).
10%Occupational and social impairment due to mild or transient symptoms which decrease work efficiency and ability to perform occupational tasks only during periods of significant stress, or symptoms controlled by continuous medication.
0%A mental condition has been formally diagnosed, but symptoms are not severe enough either to interfere with occupational and social functioning or to require continuous medication.

Common conditions rated under the same formula

All 23 other codes under the General Rating Formula for Mental Disorders

Delusional disorder (9208), Other specified and unspecified schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders (9210), Schizoaffective disorder (9211), Delirium (9300), Major or mild neurocognitive disorder due to HIV or other infections (9301), Major or mild neurocognitive disorder due to traumatic brain injury (9304), Major or mild vascular neurocognitive disorder (9305), Unspecified neurocognitive disorder (9310), Major or mild neurocognitive disorder due to Alzheimer's disease (9312), Major or mild neurocognitive disorder due to another medical condition or substance/medication-induced major or mild neurocognitive disorder (9326), Specific phobia; social anxiety disorder (social phobia) (9403), Obsessive compulsive disorder (9404), Other specified anxiety disorder (9410), Panic disorder and/or agoraphobia (9412), Dissociative amnesia; dissociative identity disorder (9416), Depersonalization/Derealization disorder (9417), Somatic symptom disorder (9421), Other specified somatic symptom and related disorder (9422), Unspecified somatic symptom and related disorder (9423), Conversion disorder (functional neurological symptom disorder) (9424), Illness anxiety disorder (9425), Cyclothymic disorder (9431), Persistent depressive disorder (dysthymia) (9433).

Text of 38 CFR 4.130 as of Feb 27, 2026. Confirm the current text at the source before relying on it.

Rules that apply to PTSD claims

Research your PTSD case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a PTSD issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2017–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.

Where this data comes from

  1. Claim
  2. Regional office decides
  3. Veteran appeals
  4. Board decides
  5. Granted · Denied · Remanded: back to the regional office

Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions show how VA's highest review body applies 38 CFR and weighs evidence on contested claims.

Each one is an appeal: a regional office decided the claim first, and the veteran appealed. So these rates describe the Board, not a veteran's odds at the regional office, where most claims are decided and whose decisions are not public.

More on what Board decisions can and cannot tell you