Data story · October 27, 2026 · Data as of October 27, 2026
Vietnam veterans and type II diabetes: a claim map
A claim map for Vietnam veterans: type II diabetes is presumed for herbicide exposure, and the nerve, kidney, eye and heart conditions that follow it can be service connected as secondary conditions. How the Board decided each step, and why the second step depends on the first.
The claim map
A claim map follows one veteran's route: where they served, the condition VA presumes for that service, and the conditions that follow from it. Each box shows how the Board ruled at that step.
Where they served
Vietnam
Service in the Republic of Vietnam or its offshore waters, January 1962 to May 1975
59,560 Board decisions that name Vietnam
presumed by law38 CFR 3.309(e)
Step 1 · presumed by law
Diabetes
35.6% granted
1,175 of 3,299 veterans · all diabetes claims 24.0%
secondary38 CFR 3.310(a)
Step 2 · claimed secondary to diabetes
66.9%granted when the same decision granted the diabetes
0.6%granted when it did not
Step 2 depends on step 1: a secondary claim needs a service-connected condition to attach to.
Nerve damage, legs (sciatic) DC 8520
41.8% · 281 of 672
all veterans 36.8%Hypertension DC 7101
14.6% · 75 of 513
all veterans 14.6%Also presumed on its own (PACT Act)Nerve damage, arms (radicular groups) DC 8513
32.2% · 150 of 466
all veterans 29.5%Erectile dysfunction DC 7522
28.8% · 81 of 281
all veterans 27.0%→ may open special monthly compensationSleep apnea DC 6847
18.0% · 34 of 189
all veterans 21.6%Cataract DC 6027
29.1% · 23 of 79
all veterans 23.1%Kidney disease DC 7502
58.4% · 45 of 77
all veterans 46.7%Peripheral artery disease DC 7114
45.6% · 31 of 68
all veterans 43.5%Glaucoma DC 6013
11.1% · 7 of 63
all veterans 8.9%Retina disease DC 6042
53.6% · 30 of 56
all veterans 39.3%Digestive cancer DC 7343
18.2% · 8 of 44
all veterans 20.3%Retinopathy DC 6006
28.6% · 10 of 35
all veterans 27.7%Coronary artery disease DC 7005
15.2% · 5 of 33
all veterans 23.9%Acid reflux (GERD) DC 7206
6.5% · 2 of 31
all veterans 23.3%Bladder condition DC 7542
24.1% · 7 of 29
all veterans 39.0%Prostate condition DC 7527
7.1% · 2 of 28
all veterans 11.7%Arrhythmia DC 7010
29.2% · 7 of 24
all veterans 30.9%Nerve damage, legs (peroneal) DC 8521
29.2% · 7 of 24
all veterans 26.3%Hearing loss DC 6100
4.3% · 1 of 23
all veterans 6.5%Dermatitis or eczema DC 7806
9.1% · 2 of 22
all veterans 18.0%Double vision DC 6090
14.3% · 3 of 21
all veterans 5.6%Stroke (bleeding) DC 8009
21.1% · 4 of 19
all veterans 20.0%Fungal skin infection DC 7813
26.3% · 5 of 19
all veterans 22.2%Hypertensive heart disease DC 7007
27.8% · 5 of 18
all veterans 29.0%COPD DC 6604
0.0% · 0 of 17
all veterans 6.7%Chronic conjunctivitis DC 6018
11.8% · 2 of 17
all veterans 12.9%Chronic liver disease DC 7345
31.3% · 5 of 16
all veterans 27.3%Nerve damage, arm (median) DC 8515
6.7% · 1 of 15
all veterans 16.3%
Bar: share granted in Board decisions that name Vietnam (one count per veteran; a remand counts as not granted). Red mark: all veterans with the same claim. Step 2 counts claims decided in the same decision; conditions with at least 15 veterans.
Is type II diabetes presumptive for Vietnam veterans?
Yes. Type II diabetes is on the herbicide list in 38 CFR 3.309(e). For a veteran with qualifying service in Vietnam, VA presumes both the exposure and the link to service, so the claim turns on the service and a current diagnosis. In decisions that name Vietnam, the Board granted 35.6% of diabetes claims, against 24.0% for all veterans.
59,560 Board decisions from 2020 to 2025 name Vietnam or a place there; this page counts the claims rated under DC 7913, diabetes, and leaves out claims for type I diabetes, which is not on the list.
What conditions can be claimed secondary to diabetes?
Nerve damage in the legs was the most common: granted for 281 of 672 veterans (41.8%) in the same decisions. Nerve damage in the arms was granted 32.2%, kidney disease 58.4%, retina disease 53.6%, peripheral artery disease 45.6% and erectile dysfunction 28.8%.
Nerve damage is rated on its own, limb by limb, so a veteran can have several secondary ratings from one diabetes grant. Hypertension is weaker as a secondary claim (14.6%), but since the PACT Act it is presumed on its own for Vietnam veterans and can be claimed directly.
Does the second step depend on the first?
Almost entirely. When the same decision granted the diabetes, the conditions claimed secondary to it were granted 66.9% of the time (480 of 718). When it did not, 4 of 709 were granted.
Where the diabetes was not on appeal, usually because it was already service connected, 22.2% of the secondary claims were granted. Those claims stood on a medical opinion about the link, not on the presumption.
Why are diabetes claims denied?
For 713 denials, the Board's note named the exposure or the service in 55.7% of them, a medical link in 49.5%, and the diagnosis in 26.5%. Many denials came down to service the Board did not find qualifying, which left a direct claim to prove.
Read the decisions
Recent decisions, with the Board's reasoning as summarized by AI:
- , December 2025: type II diabetes granted, presumed from herbicide exposure during service in Vietnam, with the diagnosis shown in VA and private medical records.
- , December 2025: peripheral neuropathy of both legs granted as secondary to service-connected type II diabetes; the evidence was evenly balanced and the Board resolved the doubt in the veteran's favor.
- , December 2025: diabetes claimed from herbicide exposure, denied; the Board found no evidence of qualifying exposure in Vietnam or the other places named, and a VA examiner found the diabetes less likely than not caused by the claimed exposures.
What the data cannot tell you
The Vietnam group comes from the places each decision names; it includes ships off the coast that may not qualify. Service-connection claims only; rating appeals are left out. The second step counts only claims decided in the same decision. Denial notes are AI-extracted. These are historical outcomes, not predictions.
For representatives
- Settle the service first: land service, or a ship in qualifying waters, within the dates.
- Make sure the diagnosis is type II diabetes, documented in the records.
- After the grant, screen for the conditions that follow: nerve damage in each limb, kidney disease, retina disease and erectile dysfunction.
Explore the data
Read the decisions behind this story
VA Law Explorer finds the decisions, quotes the reasoning and writes a research memo.
Ask VA Law ExplorerAbout the data
Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions 2020-2025 (bva_cases_v2 lead basis). The group = decisions whose locations name Vietnam or a place in Vietnam; a mention is not proof of qualifying service. Service-connection issues only (not rating, effective-date or TDIU appeals). Each veteran is counted once per condition, at the best ruling in the decision (granted, then remanded, then denied); grant share = granted / all decided, so a remand counts as not granted. Step 2 counts the group's claims marked secondary to a step-1 condition in the same decision; 'all veterans' is the same count across all decisions. Denial notes are AI-extracted. Historical outcomes, not predictions. Queried October 27, 2026. Every figure in this story is computed from the query results, and the AI-extracted data can contain errors. The figures are fixed as of that date. Related research pages describe their own data dates and methods.
VA Law Explorer Weekly
New data stories, M21-1 and 38 CFR changes, and updates to the Board decision data, in one email a week. Free; unsubscribe anytime.
We send this newsletter only. See our privacy policy.
Where this data comes from
- Claim
- Regional office decides
- Veteran appeals
- Board decides
- Granted · Denied · Remanded: back to the regional office
Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions show how VA's highest review body applies 38 CFR and weighs evidence on contested claims.
Each one is an appeal: a regional office decided the claim first, and the veteran appealed. So these rates describe the Board, not a veteran's odds at the regional office, where most claims are decided and whose decisions are not public.
More on what Board decisions can and cannot tell you