Data story · October 16, 2026 · Data as of October 16, 2026

Sleep apnea VA claims: the conditions it is claimed secondary to and what the Board grants

How the Board of Veterans' Appeals decides sleep apnea claims: how VA rates it, which service-connected conditions it is claimed secondary to and how often each wins, the obesity route, and what follows once it is service connected.

How VA rates sleep apnea

Sleep apnea is rated under DC 6847 in , from 0 to 100 percent. A veteran who needs a breathing device such as a CPAP machine is rated at 50 percent; daytime sleepiness alone is lower.

What sleep apnea is claimed secondary to

Under , a condition caused or worsened by a service-connected disability is service connected too.

Sleep apnea claimed secondary to another service-connected condition: share granted
Granted

All sleep apnea claims

24.6%

Knee condition

45.3%

Depression (major depressive disorder)

39.7%

Back condition

36.7%

Rhinitis

36.5%

Sinusitis

35.2%

PTSD

33.1%

Asthma

23.6%

Diabetes

22.2%

Tinnitus

23.6%

Share of decided claims granted; a remand counts as not granted. One count per veteran. Secondary claims are the ones the Board marked as secondary to that condition.

Claimed secondary toGrantedVeteransShare
PTSD2,7858,40633.1%
A psychiatric condition (unspecified)3971,60824.7%
Back condition33190336.7%
Knee condition34175345.3%
Depression29774939.7%
Diabetes16574322.2%
Rhinitis25670236.5%
Sinusitis18051135.2%
Asthma14260223.6%
Tinnitus15163923.6%

The obesity route

Obesity is not a disability on its own. VA's adjudication manual says it can still be an intermediate step: a service-connected condition leads to weight gain, and the weight gain causes or worsens another condition, which can then be service connected under . Recent grants used exactly that chain, from depression and from a back condition; it may be part of why knee and back claims win so often.

No group stands out

Sleep apnea comes up in decisions from every kind of service, and none of the 161 groups with at least 15 decided claims clears our bar for a lead. The lookup is still useful to see how a client's group compares.

Bar: share of this group's sleep apnea claims the Board granted. Red line: all sleep apnea claims, 24.6% granted. A bar past the line won more often than usual.
×
More often than usual: how much more often sleep apnea comes up in this group's decisions than in all Board decisions. It shows how common the condition is here, not how often it wins.
Set aside
For groups VA does not presume, veterans whose decision shows service VA already presumes for sleep apnea (for example Vietnam or Thailand for Agent Orange) are left out, because for them the presumption is the answer.
  • Fort Sill, Oklahoma

    34.3% granted · 12 of 35

    0.8×more often

  • Fort Polk

    29.5% granted · 13 of 44

    0.7×more often

  • Fort Riley

    29.4% granted · 5 of 17

    0.7×more often

  • USS Kitty Hawk

    29.4% granted · 5 of 17

    0.3×more often

  • aircraft carrier

    27.3% granted · 6 of 22

    0.8×more often

  • USS John F. Kennedy

    26.7% granted · 4 of 15

    1.6×more often

  • Fort Belvoir

    25.0% granted · 4 of 16

    0.8×more often

  • USS Saratoga

    25.0% granted · 4 of 16

    0.8×more often

  • Fort Lewis, Washington

    23.5% granted · 8 of 34

    0.8×more often

  • USS Enterprise

    22.7% granted · 5 of 22

    0.7×more often

  • Fort Stewart

    22.2% granted · 4 of 18

    0.7×more often

  • Fort Ord

    19.5% granted · 8 of 41

    0.8×more often

  • Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland

    19.0% granted · 4 of 21

    0.9×more often

  • Fort Hood

    18.0% granted · 16 of 89

    0.9×more often

  • Fort Drum

    17.6% granted · 3 of 17

    0.9×more often

  • Da Nang AFB

    17.2% granted · 10 of 58

    0.4×more often

  • Fort Benning

    17.2% granted · 10 of 58

    0.7×more often

  • Lackland AFB, Texas

    17.1% granted · 6 of 35

    1.0×more often

  • Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California

    17.1% granted · 12 of 70

    0.8×more often

  • Fort Irwin, California

    16.7% granted · 3 of 18

    1.1×more often

  • Fort Knox

    16.7% granted · 7 of 42

    0.7×more often

  • Kadena AFB

    16.7% granted · 4 of 24

    0.5×more often

  • Fort Bliss

    15.8% granted · 3 of 19

    0.5×more often

  • Kadena Air Force Base, Okinawa, Japan

    15.8% granted · 3 of 19

    0.5×more often

  • Fort Campbell

    14.7% granted · 5 of 34

    0.6×more often

  • Fort Gordon (Eisenhower)

    14.0% granted · 6 of 43

    0.7×more often

  • Udorn Royal Thai Air Force Base, Thailand

    13.6% granted · 6 of 44

    0.4×more often

  • Royal Thai Air Force Base (RTAFB) in Korat, Thailand

    13.5% granted · 5 of 37

    0.3×more often

  • Camp Lejeune

    12.8% granted · 71 of 554

    0.7×more often

  • Takhli Royal Thai Air Force Base, Thailand

    12.5% granted · 2 of 16

    0.3×more often

  • U-Tapao Royal Thai Air Force Base, Thailand

    11.6% granted · 5 of 43

    0.3×more often

  • Fort Jackson

    11.3% granted · 6 of 53

    0.7×more often

  • Fort Bragg

    10.5% granted · 6 of 57

    0.4×more often

  • Fort McClellan, Alabama

    9.6% granted · 10 of 104

    0.6×more often

  • Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri

    9.5% granted · 2 of 21

    0.5×more often

  • USS Ranger

    9.5% granted · 2 of 21

    0.7×more often

  • Fort Dix, NJ

    9.1% granted · 3 of 33

    0.5×more often

  • Andersen AFB, Guam

    6.7% granted · 1 of 15

    0.5×more often

  • Eglin AFB, Florida

    5.3% granted · 1 of 19

    0.6×more often

  • Camp Casey

    4.2% granted · 1 of 24

    0.3×more often

  • Subic Bay Naval Station

    4.2% granted · 1 of 24

    0.6×more often

  • USS Constellation

    0.0% granted · 0 of 15

    0.4×more often

  • USS Forrestal

    0.0% granted · 0 of 15

    0.8×more often

What follows from sleep apnea

Once sleep apnea is service connected, migraine claimed secondary to it was granted for 89 of 221 veterans (40.3%), acid reflux for 46 of 123, diabetes for 73 of 222, and hypertension for 106 of 426.

Read the decisions

Recent decisions, with the Board's reasoning as summarized by AI:

  • , December 2025: granted secondary to PTSD, depression and alcohol use disorder, on a private opinion; the VA opinions were inadequate for not considering the PTSD.
  • , December 2025: granted secondary to service-connected allergic rhinitis, on a VA examination and a private opinion.
  • , December 2025: granted secondary to depression, with obesity as the intermediate step.
  • , December 2025: claimed secondary to depression, denied; no link between the two was established.

What the data cannot tell you

Secondary counts include only claims the Board marked as secondary to a condition. These are historical outcomes, not predictions.

For representatives

  • Pick the secondary theory the medical evidence supports best; knee, back, depression and PTSD all have many grants.
  • Where weight gain is the mechanism, ask for an opinion that walks through each step: condition, weight gain, sleep apnea.
  • Make sure the rating evidence shows CPAP use if the veteran uses one.

Frequently asked questions

›How does VA rate sleep apnea?

Under DC 6847 in 38 CFR 4.97, from 0 to 100 percent; a veteran who needs a breathing device such as a CPAP machine is rated at 50 percent.

›Can sleep apnea be secondary to PTSD?

Yes, under 38 CFR 3.310(a), with a medical opinion. It is the most common sleep apnea claim at the Board: 2,785 of 8,406 were granted (33.1%).

›Can obesity be part of a secondary claim?

Obesity is not itself a disability, but VA's manual says it can be an intermediate step: a service-connected condition causes weight gain, and the weight gain causes sleep apnea. The Board has granted claims built that way, from depression and from a back condition.

›Which secondary claims win most often?

Sleep apnea claimed secondary to a knee condition (45.3%), depression (39.7%) and a back condition (36.7%), against 24.6% for sleep apnea claims overall.

Explore the data

Read the decisions behind this story

VA Law Explorer finds the decisions, quotes the reasoning and writes a research memo.

Ask VA Law Explorer

About the data

Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions 2020-2025 (decoder_ring.theories, decoder_ring.presumptions, decoder_ring.secondary_history, bva_cases_v2 lead basis), diagnostic code 6847. Each veteran is counted once per condition, at the best ruling in the decision (granted, then remanded, then denied); grant share = granted / all decided, so a remand counts as not granted. 'More often than usual' compares how often the condition comes up for a group with how often it comes up across all decisions. Groups overlap and are identified from what the decision text mentions; a mention is not proof of service there or of exposure. Historical outcomes, not predictions. Queried October 16, 2026. Every figure in this story is computed from the query results, and the AI-extracted data can contain errors. The figures are fixed as of that date. Related research pages describe their own data dates and methods.

VA Law Explorer Weekly

New data stories, M21-1 and 38 CFR changes, and updates to the Board decision data, in one email a week. Free; unsubscribe anytime.

We send this newsletter only. See our privacy policy.

Where this data comes from

  1. Claim
  2. Regional office decides
  3. Veteran appeals
  4. Board decides
  5. Granted · Denied · Remanded: back to the regional office

Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions show how VA's highest review body applies 38 CFR and weighs evidence on contested claims.

Each one is an appeal: a regional office decided the claim first, and the veteran appealed. So these rates describe the Board, not a veteran's odds at the regional office, where most claims are decided and whose decisions are not public.

More on what Board decisions can and cannot tell you