Data story · October 16, 2026 · Data as of October 16, 2026
Sleep apnea VA claims: the conditions it is claimed secondary to and what the Board grants
How the Board of Veterans' Appeals decides sleep apnea claims: how VA rates it, which service-connected conditions it is claimed secondary to and how often each wins, the obesity route, and what follows once it is service connected.
How VA rates sleep apnea
Sleep apnea is rated under DC 6847 in , from 0 to 100 percent. A veteran who needs a breathing device such as a CPAP machine is rated at 50 percent; daytime sleepiness alone is lower.
What sleep apnea is claimed secondary to
Under , a condition caused or worsened by a service-connected disability is service connected too.
All sleep apnea claims
Knee condition
Depression (major depressive disorder)
Back condition
Rhinitis
Sinusitis
PTSD
Asthma
Diabetes
Tinnitus
Share of decided claims granted; a remand counts as not granted. One count per veteran. Secondary claims are the ones the Board marked as secondary to that condition.
| Claimed secondary to | Granted | Veterans | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| PTSD | 2,785 | 8,406 | 33.1% |
| A psychiatric condition (unspecified) | 397 | 1,608 | 24.7% |
| Back condition | 331 | 903 | 36.7% |
| Knee condition | 341 | 753 | 45.3% |
| Depression | 297 | 749 | 39.7% |
| Diabetes | 165 | 743 | 22.2% |
| Rhinitis | 256 | 702 | 36.5% |
| Sinusitis | 180 | 511 | 35.2% |
| Asthma | 142 | 602 | 23.6% |
| Tinnitus | 151 | 639 | 23.6% |
The obesity route
Obesity is not a disability on its own. VA's adjudication manual says it can still be an intermediate step: a service-connected condition leads to weight gain, and the weight gain causes or worsens another condition, which can then be service connected under . Recent grants used exactly that chain, from depression and from a back condition; it may be part of why knee and back claims win so often.
No group stands out
Sleep apnea comes up in decisions from every kind of service, and none of the 161 groups with at least 15 decided claims clears our bar for a lead. The lookup is still useful to see how a client's group compares.
- Bar: share of this group's sleep apnea claims the Board granted. Red line: all sleep apnea claims, 24.6% granted. A bar past the line won more often than usual.
- ×
- More often than usual: how much more often sleep apnea comes up in this group's decisions than in all Board decisions. It shows how common the condition is here, not how often it wins.
- Set aside
- For groups VA does not presume, veterans whose decision shows service VA already presumes for sleep apnea (for example Vietnam or Thailand for Agent Orange) are left out, because for them the presumption is the answer.
Fort Sill, Oklahoma
34.3% granted · 12 of 35
0.8×more often
Fort Polk
29.5% granted · 13 of 44
0.7×more often
Fort Riley
29.4% granted · 5 of 17
0.7×more often
USS Kitty Hawk
29.4% granted · 5 of 17
0.3×more often
aircraft carrier
27.3% granted · 6 of 22
0.8×more often
USS John F. Kennedy
26.7% granted · 4 of 15
1.6×more often
Fort Belvoir
25.0% granted · 4 of 16
0.8×more often
USS Saratoga
25.0% granted · 4 of 16
0.8×more often
Fort Lewis, Washington
23.5% granted · 8 of 34
0.8×more often
USS Enterprise
22.7% granted · 5 of 22
0.7×more often
Fort Stewart
22.2% granted · 4 of 18
0.7×more often
Fort Ord
19.5% granted · 8 of 41
0.8×more often
Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Maryland
19.0% granted · 4 of 21
0.9×more often
Fort Hood
18.0% granted · 16 of 89
0.9×more often
Fort Drum
17.6% granted · 3 of 17
0.9×more often
Da Nang AFB
17.2% granted · 10 of 58
0.4×more often
Fort Benning
17.2% granted · 10 of 58
0.7×more often
Lackland AFB, Texas
17.1% granted · 6 of 35
1.0×more often
Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, California
17.1% granted · 12 of 70
0.8×more often
Fort Irwin, California
16.7% granted · 3 of 18
1.1×more often
Fort Knox
16.7% granted · 7 of 42
0.7×more often
Kadena AFB
16.7% granted · 4 of 24
0.5×more often
Fort Bliss
15.8% granted · 3 of 19
0.5×more often
Kadena Air Force Base, Okinawa, Japan
15.8% granted · 3 of 19
0.5×more often
Fort Campbell
14.7% granted · 5 of 34
0.6×more often
Fort Gordon (Eisenhower)
14.0% granted · 6 of 43
0.7×more often
Udorn Royal Thai Air Force Base, Thailand
13.6% granted · 6 of 44
0.4×more often
Royal Thai Air Force Base (RTAFB) in Korat, Thailand
13.5% granted · 5 of 37
0.3×more often
Camp Lejeune
12.8% granted · 71 of 554
0.7×more often
Takhli Royal Thai Air Force Base, Thailand
12.5% granted · 2 of 16
0.3×more often
U-Tapao Royal Thai Air Force Base, Thailand
11.6% granted · 5 of 43
0.3×more often
Fort Jackson
11.3% granted · 6 of 53
0.7×more often
Fort Bragg
10.5% granted · 6 of 57
0.4×more often
Fort McClellan, Alabama
9.6% granted · 10 of 104
0.6×more often
Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri
9.5% granted · 2 of 21
0.5×more often
USS Ranger
9.5% granted · 2 of 21
0.7×more often
Fort Dix, NJ
9.1% granted · 3 of 33
0.5×more often
Andersen AFB, Guam
6.7% granted · 1 of 15
0.5×more often
Eglin AFB, Florida
5.3% granted · 1 of 19
0.6×more often
Camp Casey
4.2% granted · 1 of 24
0.3×more often
Subic Bay Naval Station
4.2% granted · 1 of 24
0.6×more often
USS Constellation
0.0% granted · 0 of 15
0.4×more often
USS Forrestal
0.0% granted · 0 of 15
0.8×more often
What follows from sleep apnea
Once sleep apnea is service connected, migraine claimed secondary to it was granted for 89 of 221 veterans (40.3%), acid reflux for 46 of 123, diabetes for 73 of 222, and hypertension for 106 of 426.
Read the decisions
Recent decisions, with the Board's reasoning as summarized by AI:
- , December 2025: granted secondary to PTSD, depression and alcohol use disorder, on a private opinion; the VA opinions were inadequate for not considering the PTSD.
- , December 2025: granted secondary to service-connected allergic rhinitis, on a VA examination and a private opinion.
- , December 2025: granted secondary to depression, with obesity as the intermediate step.
- , December 2025: claimed secondary to depression, denied; no link between the two was established.
What the data cannot tell you
Secondary counts include only claims the Board marked as secondary to a condition. These are historical outcomes, not predictions.
For representatives
- Pick the secondary theory the medical evidence supports best; knee, back, depression and PTSD all have many grants.
- Where weight gain is the mechanism, ask for an opinion that walks through each step: condition, weight gain, sleep apnea.
- Make sure the rating evidence shows CPAP use if the veteran uses one.
Frequently asked questions
›How does VA rate sleep apnea?
Under DC 6847 in 38 CFR 4.97, from 0 to 100 percent; a veteran who needs a breathing device such as a CPAP machine is rated at 50 percent.
›Can sleep apnea be secondary to PTSD?
Yes, under 38 CFR 3.310(a), with a medical opinion. It is the most common sleep apnea claim at the Board: 2,785 of 8,406 were granted (33.1%).
›Can obesity be part of a secondary claim?
Obesity is not itself a disability, but VA's manual says it can be an intermediate step: a service-connected condition causes weight gain, and the weight gain causes sleep apnea. The Board has granted claims built that way, from depression and from a back condition.
›Which secondary claims win most often?
Sleep apnea claimed secondary to a knee condition (45.3%), depression (39.7%) and a back condition (36.7%), against 24.6% for sleep apnea claims overall.
Explore the data
Read the decisions behind this story
VA Law Explorer finds the decisions, quotes the reasoning and writes a research memo.
Ask VA Law ExplorerAbout the data
Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions 2020-2025 (decoder_ring.theories, decoder_ring.presumptions, decoder_ring.secondary_history, bva_cases_v2 lead basis), diagnostic code 6847. Each veteran is counted once per condition, at the best ruling in the decision (granted, then remanded, then denied); grant share = granted / all decided, so a remand counts as not granted. 'More often than usual' compares how often the condition comes up for a group with how often it comes up across all decisions. Groups overlap and are identified from what the decision text mentions; a mention is not proof of service there or of exposure. Historical outcomes, not predictions. Queried October 16, 2026. Every figure in this story is computed from the query results, and the AI-extracted data can contain errors. The figures are fixed as of that date. Related research pages describe their own data dates and methods.
VA Law Explorer Weekly
New data stories, M21-1 and 38 CFR changes, and updates to the Board decision data, in one email a week. Free; unsubscribe anytime.
We send this newsletter only. See our privacy policy.
Where this data comes from
- Claim
- Regional office decides
- Veteran appeals
- Board decides
- Granted · Denied · Remanded: back to the regional office
Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions show how VA's highest review body applies 38 CFR and weighs evidence on contested claims.
Each one is an appeal: a regional office decided the claim first, and the veteran appealed. So these rates describe the Board, not a veteran's odds at the regional office, where most claims are decided and whose decisions are not public.
More on what Board decisions can and cannot tell you