Data story · October 22, 2026 · Data as of October 22, 2026
Hearing loss VA claims: what the Board relied on in grants and denials
What the Board of Veterans' Appeals' hearing loss decisions contained when it granted service connection and when it denied it: noise exposure, medical opinions, credibility, and the hearing test that decides whether there is a disability at all.
What does VA need to service connect hearing loss?
A hearing loss that counts as a disability under 38 CFR 3.385, which sets decibel thresholds on a hearing test and a minimum speech recognition score, plus noise or another injury in service and a medical link. Sensorineural hearing loss can also be presumed, as an organic disease of the nervous system, if it reached a compensable level within a year of discharge (38 CFR 3.309(a)).
For combat veterans, also lets a credible account of noise in combat prove it happened. Hearing loss is rated under DC 6100 from the hearing test results.
Most hearing loss claims are sent back first
Of 39,411 veterans whose hearing loss claim the Board decided from 2020 to 2025, it granted 23.5%, denied 33.0% and remanded 43.5%. The comparison below sets the 9,247 grants against the 13,007 denials.
The event in service
Combat service
14%7%Noise exposure discussed
97%70%Service records discussed
95%96%
Medical evidence
Positive nexus opinion
41%11%Favorable VA exam
18%8%Private medical opinion
43%27%Treating doctor's opinion
4%2%Unfavorable VA exam
92%94%Negative nexus opinion
81%66%
Statements and credibility
Veteran's own statement
89%92%Buddy statement
4%2%Board found the veteran credible
65%20%Board doubted the veteran's credibility
7%15%
How the Board weighed it
Benefit of the doubt applied
86%15%
Share of granted (green) and denied (gray) veterans whose decision contained each item, as extracted by AI from the decision text. Remanded claims are left out of this comparison. This shows what the decisions contained, not what caused the result.
What separated hearing loss grants from denials?
Noise exposure was discussed in 96.6% of grants and 70.1% of denials, and a positive nexus opinion was in 40.9% of grants and 11.3% of denials. With both, the Board granted 62.4%; with neither, 3.5%.
Positive nexus opinion
No positive opinion
Noise exposure discussed
62%
granted · 3,723 of 5,965
21%
granted · 5,205 of 25,114
Not discussed
6%
granted · 61 of 1,017
4%
granted · 258 of 7,315
One count per veteran; a remand counts as not granted.
With both, the Board granted 3,723 of 5,965 claims. Noise exposure without a positive opinion was granted 20.7%; a positive opinion without any noise exposure discussed only 6.0%. The opinion has to rest on a noise the record supports.
Why are hearing loss claims denied?
For 12,254 denials, the decision summary noted what was missing: a medical link in 43.9% of them, and the hearing loss itself, measured against VA's thresholds, in 43.7%. Many veterans have some hearing loss that does not meet the 38 CFR 3.385 definition.
In the third decision below, the hearing test did not meet the thresholds, so there was no disability to service connect. A new hearing test can change that later, as hearing loss often gets worse.
Does a normal hearing test at discharge end the claim?
No. Hearing loss can be service connected even if it was first measured years later, when the evidence links it to noise in service. An unfavorable VA exam was in 92.1% of grants, because the Board weighs it against the other evidence.
The Board found the veteran credible in 65.0% of grants and 20.1% of denials. A specific, consistent account of the noise (the job, the weapons, the engines) and of when the hearing got worse is what the grants below relied on.
Read the decisions
Recent decisions, with the Board's reasoning as summarized by AI:
- , December 2025: bilateral hearing loss granted; the Board related it to hazardous noise as a jet aircraft maintenance specialist.
- , December 2025: bilateral hearing loss granted despite no complaints in service; the Board found the negative VA opinion insufficient because it did not consider the veteran's statements about noise exposure and ongoing hearing problems.
- , December 2025: bilateral hearing loss denied; the August 2023 VA exam did not meet the criteria for hearing loss under .
What the data cannot tell you
These are what the decisions contained, not what caused the result. Some items, such as a credibility finding or the benefit of the doubt, are part of how the Board explains a grant. The evidence items were extracted by AI and apply to the whole decision. Increased-rating claims are left out. Historical outcomes, not predictions.
For representatives
- Check the latest hearing test against first; without a disability by that test, the claim cannot be granted.
- Document the noise: the job, the duties, the weapons or engines, and the years.
- Get a medical opinion that addresses that noise and explains why a normal test at discharge does not rule out a link.
Explore the data
Read the decisions behind this story
VA Law Explorer finds the decisions, quotes the reasoning and writes a research memo.
Ask VA Law ExplorerAbout the data
Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions 2020-2025 (bva_cases_v2 lead basis): hearing loss (DC 6100) service connection issues (not increased-rating, effective-date or TDIU issues). Each veteran is counted once, at the best ruling in the decision; grant share = granted / all decided, so a remand counts as not granted. Evidence flags were extracted by AI from each decision and apply to the whole decision, not one issue. Grants vs denials shows what the decisions contained, not what caused the result. Historical outcomes, not predictions. Queried October 22, 2026. Every figure in this story is computed from the query results, and the AI-extracted data can contain errors. The figures are fixed as of that date. Related research pages describe their own data dates and methods.
VA Law Explorer Weekly
New data stories, M21-1 and 38 CFR changes, and updates to the Board decision data, in one email a week. Free; unsubscribe anytime.
We send this newsletter only. See our privacy policy.
Where this data comes from
- Claim
- Regional office decides
- Veteran appeals
- Board decides
- Granted · Denied · Remanded: back to the regional office
Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions show how VA's highest review body applies 38 CFR and weighs evidence on contested claims.
Each one is an appeal: a regional office decided the claim first, and the veteran appealed. So these rates describe the Board, not a veteran's odds at the regional office, where most claims are decided and whose decisions are not public.
More on what Board decisions can and cannot tell you