Data story · October 19, 2026 · Data as of October 19, 2026

Guam VA claims: the Agent Orange presumption and what the Board grants

How the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided claims from veterans who served on Guam: the PACT Act added a herbicide presumption for service between 1962 and 1980, and grants on the herbicide-list conditions rose sharply after it.

Is there an Agent Orange presumption for Guam?

Yes, since the PACT Act. VA presumes herbicide exposure for service on Guam or American Samoa, or in their territorial waters, between January 1962 and July 1980 (38 U.S.C. 1116A). The conditions on the herbicide list are then presumed service connected.

VA's adjudication manual lists Guam and American Samoa, and their territorial waters, among the herbicide locations under 38 U.S.C. 1116A (M21-1 VIII.i.1.A gives the exact dates). Once the service is shown, the conditions on the herbicide list ( and 38 U.S.C. 1116) are presumed, as they are for Vietnam veterans.

How often does the Board grant Guam herbicide claims?

For the conditions on the herbicide list, the Board granted 39.4% of claims from veterans whose decision names Guam, against 23.4% for all veterans with the same conditions. Diabetes was granted 38.2% of the time.

1,305 Board decisions from 2020 to 2025 name Guam. The decision records herbicide exposure in 915 of them (70.1%). The chart compares each condition with all veterans who claimed it.

Board outcomes for Guam veterans, by condition
Bar: share granted for Guam veterans
Red mark: all veterans with the same condition

Conditions on the Agent Orange list

VA presumes these for veterans who served on Guam between January 1962 and July 1980.

  • Diabetes DC 7913

    38.2% · 146 of 382

    all veterans 20.0%On the Agent Orange list
  • Hypertension DC 7101

    34.2% · 89 of 260

    all veterans 20.2%On the Agent Orange list
  • Coronary artery disease DC 7005

    45.8% · 93 of 203

    all veterans 30.0%On the Agent Orange list
  • Prostate, bladder or kidney cancer DC 7528

    44.7% · 63 of 141

    all veterans 32.7%On the Agent Orange list
  • Parkinson's disease DC 8004

    42.6% · 26 of 61

    all veterans 35.3%On the Agent Orange list
  • Leukemia DC 7703

    33.3% · 9 of 27

    all veterans 32.9%On the Agent Orange list

Other conditions Guam veterans claimed

  • PTSD DC 9411

    27.8% · 40 of 144

    all veterans 31.4%
  • Nerve damage, legs DC 8520

    25.2% · 33 of 131

    all veterans 27.1%
  • Hearing loss DC 6100

    24.8% · 29 of 117

    all veterans 18.7%
  • Sleep apnea DC 6847

    20.2% · 19 of 94

    all veterans 24.6%
  • Erectile dysfunction DC 7522

    18.9% · 14 of 74

    all veterans 17.7%
  • Nerve damage, arms DC 8513

    16.7% · 11 of 66

    all veterans 19.9%
  • Tinnitus DC 6260

    50.8% · 33 of 65

    all veterans 46.6%
  • COPD DC 6604

    13.6% · 8 of 59

    all veterans 13.2%
  • Skin cancer DC 7818

    28.8% · 15 of 52

    all veterans 19.2%
  • Knee DC 5257

    15.2% · 7 of 46

    all veterans 20.3%
  • Migraine DC 8100

    20.5% · 9 of 44

    all veterans 30.8%
  • Digestive cancers DC 7343

    20.9% · 9 of 43

    all veterans 23.5%
  • Back (degenerative arthritis) DC 5242

    39.5% · 17 of 43

    all veterans 23.1%
  • Back or neck strain DC 5237

    5.3% · 2 of 38

    all veterans 15.1%
  • Dermatitis or eczema DC 7806

    20.0% · 7 of 35

    all veterans 18.6%
  • Back (disc disease) DC 5243

    14.7% · 5 of 34

    all veterans 20.7%
  • Acid reflux (GERD) DC 7206

    20.7% · 6 of 29

    all veterans 20.0%
  • Degenerative arthritis (other joints) DC 5003

    25.9% · 7 of 27

    all veterans 22.9%
  • Shoulder DC 5201

    19.2% · 5 of 26

    all veterans 16.3%

One count per veteran per condition; a remand counts as not granted. Conditions with at least 25 veterans.

Diabetes, the most common claim, was granted for 146 of 382 veterans (38.2%, against 20.0% overall). Coronary artery disease (45.8%), hypertension (34.2%) and prostate, bladder or kidney cancer (44.7%) were all well above the share for all veterans. Conditions off the list did about as well as for everyone: 23.7%, against 23.9% for the same mix of conditions.

Did the PACT Act change Guam outcomes at the Board?

Yes. On herbicide-list conditions, the grant share was 11.1% in decisions from 2020 and 2021 and 50.1% from 2023 to 2025.

Herbicide-list conditions, share granted by year of the Board decision
Decisions that name GuamAll veterans, same conditions

2020

12.1%
17.3%

2021

10.0%
20.1%

2022

47.3%
25.4%

2023

54.4%
27.4%

2024

56.7%
26.7%

2025

36.2%
23.8%

Share of decided claims granted; a remand counts as not granted. One count per veteran. Conditions on the herbicide list: 38 CFR 3.309(e) and 38 U.S.C. 1116.

The PACT Act became law in August 2022. Decisions from 2020 and 2021 granted 11.1% of herbicide-list claims for Guam veterans; from 2023 to 2025 it was 50.1%. The share fell back in 2025 (36.2%). The data does not show why.

Why are Guam herbicide claims denied?

For 231 denials of herbicide-list conditions, the Board's note named the exposure or the service in 64.5% of them. A common reason in recent denials: no confirmed service on Guam within the presumptive dates.

In recent denials, the Board found no confirmed service on Guam within the presumptive dates, or no evidence of exposure. Some veterans whose decision names Guam also served in Vietnam or offshore, which carries its own presumption, so a denial on Guam service is not always the end of the claim.

Read the decisions

Recent decisions, with the Board's reasoning as summarized by AI:

  • , April 2026: diabetes granted on presumed herbicide exposure during service on Guam, under the PACT Act.
  • , April 2026: hypertension granted; the veteran served on Guam in 1973, within the presumptive period.
  • , April 2026: ischemic heart disease denied; the Board found no confirmed service on Guam during the presumptive period.

What the data cannot tell you

The Guam group comes from the places each decision names; a mention is not proof of service there, of the dates, or of exposure. The herbicide flag and denial notes are AI-extracted. These are historical outcomes, not predictions.

For representatives

  • Prove the dates first: service on Guam, or in its territorial waters, between January 1962 and July 1980. Personnel records, unit histories and ship logs all help.
  • Then the diagnosis: for a condition on the herbicide list, the presumption covers the link to service.
  • For a claim denied before the PACT Act, a supplemental claim under the new law may be worth filing.
  • Check for Vietnam or offshore service too, which has its own presumption.

Explore the data

Read the decisions behind this story

VA Law Explorer finds the decisions, quotes the reasoning and writes a research memo.

Ask VA Law Explorer

About the data

Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions 2020-2025 (bva_cases_v2 lead basis). Guam veterans = decisions whose locations name Guam; a mention is not proof of service there, of the dates or of exposure. Each veteran is counted once per condition, at the best ruling in the decision (granted, then remanded, then denied); grant share = granted / all decided, so a remand counts as not granted. 'All veterans' is the same count across all decisions. The herbicide flag and denial notes are AI-extracted from each decision. Historical outcomes, not predictions. Queried October 19, 2026. Every figure in this story is computed from the query results, and the AI-extracted data can contain errors. The figures are fixed as of that date. Related research pages describe their own data dates and methods.

VA Law Explorer Weekly

New data stories, M21-1 and 38 CFR changes, and updates to the Board decision data, in one email a week. Free; unsubscribe anytime.

We send this newsletter only. See our privacy policy.

Where this data comes from

  1. Claim
  2. Regional office decides
  3. Veteran appeals
  4. Board decides
  5. Granted · Denied · Remanded: back to the regional office

Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions show how VA's highest review body applies 38 CFR and weighs evidence on contested claims.

Each one is an appeal: a regional office decided the claim first, and the veteran appealed. So these rates describe the Board, not a veteran's odds at the regional office, where most claims are decided and whose decisions are not public.

More on what Board decisions can and cannot tell you