Data story · October 16, 2026 · Data as of October 16, 2026
Fort McClellan VA claims: what the Board grants without a presumption
How the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided claims from veterans who served at Fort McClellan, Alabama: no location presumption covers the base, and the Board granted every common condition less often than it did for other veterans.
No presumption for Fort McClellan
VA's location presumptions name specific places: Vietnam, Thailand and the other herbicide locations, Camp Lejeune, and the PACT Act locations. Fort McClellan, Alabama, is not among them.
VA's adjudication manual does list Fort McClellan among World War II test sites for mustard gas and lewisite. Those agents have their own rule, , for veterans with full-body exposure. Outside that narrow case, a Fort McClellan claim is a direct service connection claim: proof of the exposure, a current diagnosis and a medical opinion linking the two.
How the Board ruled, condition by condition
1,180 Board decisions name Fort McClellan. The chart compares each condition with all veterans who claimed it.
- Bar: share granted for Fort McClellan veterans
- Red mark: all veterans with the same condition
Conditions on the Agent Orange list
VA presumes these for herbicide exposure in Vietnam, Thailand and other listed places, not for Fort McClellan.
Diabetes DC 7913
14.8% · 50 of 338
all veterans 20.0%On the Agent Orange listHypertension DC 7101
13.9% · 30 of 216
all veterans 20.2%On the Agent Orange listProstate, bladder or kidney cancer DC 7528
22.0% · 22 of 100
all veterans 32.7%On the Agent Orange listCoronary artery disease DC 7005
26.2% · 22 of 84
all veterans 30.0%On the Agent Orange listHypothyroidism DC 7903
10.6% · 5 of 47
all veterans 26.0%On the Agent Orange listParkinson's disease DC 8004
17.6% · 6 of 34
all veterans 35.3%On the Agent Orange list
Other conditions Fort McClellan veterans claimed
Nerve damage, legs DC 8520
12.0% · 22 of 184
all veterans 27.1%Nerve damage, arms DC 8513
9.6% · 12 of 125
all veterans 19.9%Sleep apnea DC 6847
11.5% · 12 of 104
all veterans 24.6%Hearing loss DC 6100
12.1% · 11 of 91
all veterans 18.7%Knee DC 5257
7.4% · 5 of 68
all veterans 20.3%Erectile dysfunction DC 7522
12.7% · 8 of 63
all veterans 17.7%Migraine DC 8100
11.3% · 7 of 62
all veterans 30.8%Back (degenerative arthritis) DC 5242
11.7% · 7 of 60
all veterans 23.1%Tinnitus DC 6260
30.0% · 18 of 60
all veterans 46.6%COPD DC 6604
12.1% · 7 of 58
all veterans 13.2%PTSD DC 9411
24.6% · 14 of 57
all veterans 31.4%Dermatitis or eczema DC 7806
5.7% · 3 of 53
all veterans 18.6%Acid reflux (GERD) DC 7206
7.5% · 4 of 53
all veterans 20.0%Fibromyalgia DC 5025
2.1% · 1 of 47
all veterans 16.3%Back or neck strain DC 5237
2.3% · 1 of 44
all veterans 15.1%Skin cancer DC 7818
7.1% · 3 of 42
all veterans 19.2%Back (disc disease) DC 5243
10.3% · 4 of 39
all veterans 20.7%Asthma DC 6602
10.5% · 4 of 38
all veterans 24.8%Digestive cancers DC 7343
10.8% · 4 of 37
all veterans 23.5%Degenerative arthritis (other joints) DC 5003
14.7% · 5 of 34
all veterans 22.9%Shoulder DC 5201
3.2% · 1 of 31
all veterans 16.3%Hypertensive heart disease DC 7007
9.7% · 3 of 31
all veterans 15.3%
One count per veteran per condition; a remand counts as not granted. Conditions with at least 30 veterans.
Every condition with at least 30 veterans was granted less often for Fort McClellan veterans. Diabetes, the most common claim, was granted for 50 of 338 (14.8%, against 20.0% overall), and hypertension for 30 of 216. The gaps were wider for conditions not on any exposure list: migraine 11.3% against 30.8%, a knee condition 7.4%, fibromyalgia 1 of 47.
The Agent Orange question
Herbicide exposure is recorded in 553 of the decisions (46.9%), including 236 of the 338 with a diabetes claim. The Board's recent decisions found no evidence of herbicide use at Fort McClellan, and the base is not a presumptive location, so those claims rarely succeeded.
The grants that did come through rested on specific evidence. In some recent decisions VA conceded a toxic exposure risk activity at Fort McClellan, such as exposure to PCBs, and a medical opinion then linked the condition to it. In others, a credible account of a specific incident carried the claim.
Read the decisions
Recent decisions, with the Board's reasoning as summarized by AI:
- , December 2025: asthma granted; the Board found credible the veteran's account of toxic gas exposure at Fort McClellan when a gas mask malfunctioned, with respiratory symptoms since.
- , December 2025: hiatal hernia granted; a toxic exposure risk activity at Fort McClellan was conceded and a VA opinion linked the condition.
- , November 2025: a peritoneal mass denied; VA conceded exposure to PCBs, but the Board found no evidence of herbicide use at Fort McClellan.
- , December 2025: diabetes denied; no qualifying herbicide exposure was shown, including at Fort McClellan.
What the data cannot tell you
The Fort McClellan group comes from the places each decision names; a mention is not proof of service there or of exposure. The herbicide flag and denial notes are AI-extracted. These are historical outcomes, not predictions.
For representatives
- Do not rely on a presumption. Document the specific exposure: dates at Fort McClellan, duties, chemical or radiological training, any incident.
- Ask whether VA will concede a toxic exposure risk activity for the veteran's duties, then get an opinion that links the condition to that exposure.
- For World War II-era veterans with full-body mustard gas or lewisite exposure, check .
Frequently asked questions
›Is there a VA presumption for Fort McClellan?
No location presumption covers Fort McClellan: the herbicide, Camp Lejeune and PACT Act presumptions name other places. VA's manual does list Fort McClellan among World War II test sites for mustard gas and lewisite, which have their own rule for full-body exposure (38 CFR 3.316).
›How often does the Board grant Fort McClellan claims?
For the conditions Fort McClellan veterans claimed most, the Board granted 13.2% of claims, against 23.1% for all veterans with the same conditions. Every one of the 28 conditions was granted less often.
›Can Agent Orange claims succeed for Fort McClellan?
Rarely. Diabetes, the most common claim, was granted 14.8% of the time; the Board has found no evidence of herbicide use at Fort McClellan, so these claims need proof of the exposure and a medical opinion.
›Why were Fort McClellan claims denied?
When the Board denied a claim, its note on what was missing named a medical link in 61.9% of 767 denials and the exposure itself in 34.4%.
Explore the data
Read the decisions behind this story
VA Law Explorer finds the decisions, quotes the reasoning and writes a research memo.
Ask VA Law ExplorerAbout the data
Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions 2020-2025 (bva_cases_v2 lead basis). Fort McClellan veterans = decisions whose locations name Fort McClellan; a mention is not proof of service there or of exposure. Each veteran is counted once per condition, at the best ruling in the decision (granted, then remanded, then denied); grant share = granted / all decided, so a remand counts as not granted. 'All veterans' is the same count across all decisions. The herbicide flag and denial notes are AI-extracted from each decision. Historical outcomes, not predictions. Queried October 16, 2026. Every figure in this story is computed from the query results, and the AI-extracted data can contain errors. The figures are fixed as of that date. Related research pages describe their own data dates and methods.
VA Law Explorer Weekly
New data stories, M21-1 and 38 CFR changes, and updates to the Board decision data, in one email a week. Free; unsubscribe anytime.
We send this newsletter only. See our privacy policy.
Where this data comes from
- Claim
- Regional office decides
- Veteran appeals
- Board decides
- Granted · Denied · Remanded: back to the regional office
Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions show how VA's highest review body applies 38 CFR and weighs evidence on contested claims.
Each one is an appeal: a regional office decided the claim first, and the veteran appealed. So these rates describe the Board, not a veteran's odds at the regional office, where most claims are decided and whose decisions are not public.
More on what Board decisions can and cannot tell you