Secondary service connection

Hypertension secondary to a psychiatric disorder: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2017 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided hypertension claimed as secondary to a psychiatric disorder in 1,789 decisions. It granted the issue in 18.9% of them, close to the 17.6% grant rate for all hypertension issues, denied it in 17.8%, and remanded it in 62.0%. Counting only decisions on the merits, 51.4% were granted.

Decisions

1,789

2017–2026

Granted

18.9%

All hypertension: 17.6%

Granted on the merits

51.4%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

62.0%

Denied: 17.8%

How VA rates hypertension

Once service connection is granted, VA assigns a disability rating from the rating schedule: 38 CFR 4.104, diagnostic code 7101 (Hypertensive vascular disease (hypertension and isolated systolic hypertension)). The rating is the same whether the condition is service connected directly or as secondary to another disability.

RatingCriteria
60%Diastolic pressure predominantly 130 or more
40%Diastolic pressure predominantly 120 or more
20%Diastolic pressure predominantly 110 or more, or; systolic pressure predominantly 200 or more
10%Diastolic pressure predominantly 100 or more, or; systolic pressure predominantly 160 or more, or; minimum evaluation for an individual with a history of diastolic pressure predominantly 100 or more who requires continuous medication for control
  • Note (1): Hypertension or isolated systolic hypertension must be confirmed by readings taken two or more times on at least three different days. For purposes of this section, the term hypertension means that the diastolic blood pressure is predominantly 90mm. or greater, and isolated systolic hypertension means that the systolic blood pressure is predominantly 160mm. or greater with a diastolic blood pressure of less than 90mm.
  • Note (2): Evaluate hypertension due to aortic insufficiency or hyperthyroidism, which is usually the isolated systolic type, as part of the condition causing it rather than by a separate evaluation.
  • Note (3): Evaluate hypertension separately from hypertensive heart disease and other types of heart disease.

Text of 38 CFR 4.104 as of Feb 27, 2026. Confirm the current text at the source before relying on it.

See all hypertension decisions, direct and secondary.

Hypertension secondary to a psychiatric disorder: outcomes by year

YearIssues decidedGrantedDeniedRemandedOther
2017
94
10.6%26.6%57.4%5.3%
2018
182
10.4%20.9%65.4%3.3%
2019
187
16.0%19.8%63.6%0.5%
2020
234
15.8%21.4%61.1%1.7%
2021
224
17.9%23.7%56.7%1.8%
2022
195
18.5%12.3%68.7%0.5%
2023
216
16.7%14.4%68.1%0.9%
2024
189
22.2%11.1%66.7%0.0%
2025
188
29.3%12.2%58.0%0.5%
2026
88
37.5%19.3%43.2%0.0%

Each row counts issues (each condition the Board decided), so the shares add up to 100%. Other: dismissed, withdrawn or no clear outcome. Years with fewer than 20 issues are left out.

Evidence in granted and denied hypertension decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the hypertension issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion43084.8%23.9%+61.0 pts
Private medical opinion61868.4%33.3%+35.1 pts
Favorable VA exam21174.0%46.0%+28.0 pts
Treating physician opinion10571.2%49.8%+21.4 pts
Buddy statement4950.0%51.5%−1.5 pts
Combat service8748.3%51.6%−3.3 pts
Lay statement1,36043.8%85.8%−42.1 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 76.0% of the decisions that granted hypertension.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 20.1% of grants and 7.5% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often hypertension was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion1,13646.0%65.2%−19.3 pts
Unfavorable VA exam1,36348.0%70.7%−22.7 pts

How these claims are argued

A secondary claim says a psychiatric disorder caused hypertension or made it worse, and names how. Below: whether the Board's decision discussed aggravation, and the medical link each decision names, with how often those issues were granted.

Aggravation discussed

made worse by the disability, 3.310(b)

16.7%

granted, of 743 issues (41.3% of all)

Causation only

caused by the disability, 3.310(a)

20.3%

granted, of 1,054 issues (58.7% of all)

Medical link namedIssuesGranted

Weight gain or obesity

Granted “Obesity as intermediate step” 26004219 (2026)

Denied “Hypertension attributed to genetics, obesity, and lifestyle..” 26000629 (2026)

15925.8%

Stress

Granted “Private medical opinion linked hypertension to service-connected PTSD and in-service stressors” A26028875 (2026)

Denied “The Veteran sought service connection for hypertension, claiming it was secondary to his service-connected bowel issues and stress.” 26000629 (2026)

10923.9%

Chronic pain

Granted “December 2025 VA examiner found chronic pain can worsen hypertension via sympathetic nervous system activation and sleep issues..” 26002222 (2026)

Denied “Private opinion lacked rationale for nexus to chronic pain.” 23003290 (2023)

2450.0%

Sleep disruption

Granted “Service-connected for persistent depressive disorder with alcohol use disorder and insomnia.” A25037550 (2025)

Denied “Veteran has current hypertension and service-connected insomnia/anxiety/alcohol use disorder.” A25021919 (2025)

2420.8%

Medication side effects

Granted “The Board found that while VA examinations were inadequate or did not fully address the veteran's risk factors, the May 2020 opinion noting a nexus to NSAID and alcohol use related to service-connected conditions raised reasonable...” 25011081 (2025)

Denied “The veteran claimed entitlement to service connection for hypertension, alleging it was secondary to his service-connected depression and joint disabilities, potentially due to medication side effects.” 20043214 (2020)

1625.0%

Reduced activity or mobility

Denied “Service connection for hypertension was denied, claimed as secondary to obesity caused by inactivity due to the service-connected back condition and/or acquired psychiatric disorder.” 23013980 (2023)

120.0%

Based on words in the AI-written summary and reasons for each issue, not a reading of the full decision. 18.0% of the 1,797 issues name at least one medical link; the rest only say “secondary to” the disability. One issue can name several links. Granted is the share of those issues granted (remands count as not granted). A link named in a denial was often the argument the Board rejected.

Why the Board granted or denied hypertension

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Caused by the service-connected disability61
  2. Current diagnosis established44
  3. Service connection established36
  4. Aggravated by the service-connected disability20
  5. Hypertension diagnosed5
  6. Service records negative or silent4
  7. Evidence evenly balanced4
  8. Secondary service connection granted3

Most common reasons in denials

  1. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service67
  2. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis47
  3. Service records negative or silent35
  4. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim29
  5. Aggravated by the service-connected disability13
  6. No current diagnosis13
  7. No continuity of symptomatology13
  8. Continuity of symptomatology since service10

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent hypertension decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26038343Yvette R. White · 2026

New and relevant evidence submitted in December 2024 warranted readjudication.; In-service elevated blood pressure readings noted.; Veteran provided competent and credible lay statements of continuity of symptomatology.; Evidence found to be in equipoise, resolving doubt in Veteran's favor.

Citation Nr. A26037676R. Feinberg · 2026

Competent diagnosis of hypertension since October 1999.; Presumed herbicide exposure due to Vietnam service.; Probiric February 2020 VA examiner opinions linking anxiety/PTSD to hypertension.; Resolving all doubt in Veteran's favor.

Citation Nr. A26035885G. A. Wasik · 2026

Hypertension diagnosed.; Evidence divided on secondary link to depression.; VA opinion found unlikely due to pre-existing depression; Board found opinion limited.; Private opinion supported link.; Approximate balance of evidence invoked benefit of doubt.

Denied

Citation Nr. A26039336Ray Barto Slabbekorn, Jr. · 2026

No evidence of in-service chronicity, manifestation within presumptive period, or continuity of symptomatology.; Service treatment records silent regarding hypertension; post-service diagnosis years later.; No evidence of herbicide exposure to support presumptive claim.

Citation Nr. A26039704J.P. Norman · 2026

No competent positive nexus opinion; VA examiner opined less likely than not caused by toxic exposure; Hypertension attributed to lifestyle factors

Citation Nr. A26034578J. Kirby · 2026

No in-service hypertension diagnosis; Negative VA nexus opinion; Psychiatric condition not service-connected

What VA needs to grant a secondary claim

Secondary service connection means VA disability benefits for a condition caused or made worse by a disability that is already service connected (38 CFR 3.310). The claim needs three things:

  1. A current diagnosis of hypertension.
  2. A psychiatric disorder is already service connected.
  3. Medical evidence linking them (a nexus opinion): hypertension was caused by a psychiatric disorder (3.310(a)), or was made worse beyond its natural progress by it (aggravation, 3.310(b)).

VA's procedures for these claims are in M21-1 V.ii.2.D. When the evidence for and against is about even, VA must decide in the veteran's favor (38 CFR 3.102).

Other conditions secondary to a psychiatric disorder

Hypertension secondary to other conditions

See all conditions secondary to a psychiatric disorder or hypertension as a primary or secondary condition.

Rules that apply to secondary hypertension claims

Research your hypertension case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Counts decisions in which the Board decided a hypertension issue claimed as secondary to a psychiatric disorder, by the outcome of that issue.
  • The primary disability is read from the decision text ("secondary to …") and grouped by name, so spellings such as "PTSD" and "posttraumatic stress disorder" count together.
  • Secondary claims also include aggravation of a non-service-connected condition by a service-connected one (38 CFR 3.310(b)).
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2017–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.