Research by occupation · Extracted Oct 14, 2026

Aircraft mechanics: BVA outcomes by condition

Explore Board records grouped under fixed-wing aircraft mechanic occupations. Compare the recorded outcomes, then examine how individual decisions treated the evidence.

These are historical record groups, not evidence that the job caused a condition or a forecast for a claim. Grant shares include remands in the denominator.

Download data and method (JSON)

Hearing loss and tinnitus, side by side

The occupation is shared; the condition and evidence can differ. Select another occupation to see whether the same pattern appears.

Tinnitus63.8% granted

328 granted / 514 records · 96 denied · 90 remanded

Hearing loss35.4% granted

283 granted / 799 records · 248 denied · 268 remanded

Both bars use a 0–100% scale. At least 200 records per condition; remands stay in the denominator. These are different groups of records, not matched veterans or predictions. The comparison does not establish what caused the gap.

Read the comparison across occupations

Conditions in the aircraft-mechanic records

The condition names and diagnostic codes come from the dataset. A condition appearing here does not establish a work-related exposure or an accepted theory of service connection.

20 of 20 condition groups

Recorded outcomes by condition. Shares include remands in the denominator.
Condition / diagnostic codeRecordsGrantedDeniedRemandedGrant share
Hearing lossDC 610079928324826835.4%
Tinnitus, recurrentDC 6260514328969063.8%
Diabetes mellitusDC 7913240123486951.3%
Hypertensive vascular disease (hypertension and isolated systolic hypertension)DC 7101213444812120.7%
Knee, other impairment ofDC 525718028549815.6%
Sleep Apnea Syndromes (Obstructive, Central, Mixed)DC 6847171243511214.0%
Paralysis ofDC 852016858347634.5%
Arteriosclerotic heart disease (coronary artery disease)DC 700514579214554.5%
Posttraumatic stress disorderDC 941114349454934.3%
Degenerative arthritis, degenerative disc disease other than intervertebral disc syndrome (also, see either DC 5003 or 5010)DC 524214256424439.4%
Lumbosacral or cervical strainDC 523712422287417.7%
Malignant neoplasms of the genitourinary systemDC 752812266233354.1%
Intervertebral disc syndromeDC 524311522355819.1%
Arm, limitation of motion ofDC 520110933274930.3%
MigraineDC 810010235214634.3%
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseDC 660410114246313.9%
Erectile dysfunction, with or without penile deformityDC 75229032154335.6%
Paralysis ofDC 85138327183832.5%
Degenerative arthritis, other than post-traumaticDC 50036915203421.7%
Gastroesophageal reflux diseaseDC 72065210162619.2%

Groups with at least 50 records, ordered by record count. Records may concern service connection, ratings, or other benefits. The same veteran can appear in more than one group; do not add these counts to estimate veterans.

What the Board said about the evidence

These aircraft-mechanic decisions illustrate evidence questions to investigate. They come from the broader BVA corpus; their membership in the aggregate extract is not established. They do not explain how often a reason accounts for an outcome.

Granted · Decision 19101054

The Board credited reports of symptoms

“the evidence for and against the claims is at least in equipoise.”

Service connection for both hearing loss and tinnitus was granted. The Board discussed the veteran’s reports of symptoms and the adequacy of the unfavorable opinion.

Read the full decision →

Denied · Decision 19100828

The record included another noise-exposure history

“He reported in-service noise exposure from aircraft and post-service occupational noise exposure from 38 years working as a pipe fitter.”

Service connection for hearing loss and tinnitus was denied. The decision discusses post-service exposure, reported onset, and the nexus opinion.

Read the full decision →

Remanded · Decision 19103285

A favorable conclusion still needed a rationale

“This opinion is inadequate because it fails to provide a supporting rationale for the conclusion reached.”

The hearing-loss issue was remanded. The Board discussed a favorable opinion’s missing rationale and required an addendum addressing the audiogram.

Read the full decision →

How to read these numbers

Counts are recorded outcomes for source–diagnostic-code groups, not unique veterans. Denominators include granted, denied and remanded records. Groups may overlap. The extract does not distinguish service connection from increased ratings or other benefits; occupation mentions do not establish a causal relationship or an accepted legal theory. This is a separate analytical dataset, not all matching records in the full Explorer corpus.

Grant share = granted records ÷ all recorded outcomes. The condition table includes groups with at least 50 records. The hearing comparison requires at least 200 records for each condition. Small groups remain in the underlying source extract but are excluded from these displays.

This page and its comparison story use a fixed extract from Oct 14, 2026. That is the extraction date, not the date of the latest decision. Decision-date coverage was not supplied with this dataset. AI-extracted classifications can contain errors.

Download the displayed data, source queries, and dataset version. Cite this page as “VA Law Explorer, CaseScribe AI,” with the extraction date.

VA Law Explorer Weekly

New data stories, M21-1 and 38 CFR changes, and updates to the Board decision data, in one email a week. Free; unsubscribe anytime.

We send this newsletter only. See our privacy policy.