BVA decisions by condition

Varicose veins: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2017 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a varicose veins issue in 1,602 decisions. It granted the varicose veins issue in 20.4% of them, close to the 19.4% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 36.4%, and remanded it in 44.8%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 35.9% were granted.

Decisions

1,602

2017–2026

Granted

20.4%

All conditions: 19.4%

Granted on the merits

35.9%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

44.8%

Denied: 36.4%

Varicose veins outcomes by year

YearIssues decidedGrantedDeniedRemandedOther
2017
173
17.3%37.0%40.5%5.2%
2018
250
14.8%37.6%44.8%2.8%
2019
223
20.6%41.7%36.8%0.9%
2020
270
22.2%39.3%37.4%1.1%
2021
228
18.4%39.5%41.7%0.4%
2022
215
27.0%30.2%40.9%1.9%
2023
229
18.8%25.3%54.1%1.7%
2024
237
21.9%33.3%44.3%0.4%
2025
240
12.9%41.7%45.0%0.4%
2026
88
27.3%26.1%46.6%0.0%

Each row counts issues (each condition the Board decided), so the shares add up to 100%. Other: dismissed, withdrawn or no clear outcome. Years with fewer than 50 issues are left out.

Evidence in granted and denied varicose veins decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the varicose veins issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion21063.4%30.9%+32.5 pts
Buddy statement4365.4%35.1%+30.3 pts
Favorable VA exam19260.0%31.2%+28.8 pts
Private medical opinion48744.5%31.1%+13.4 pts
Treating physician opinion8646.2%35.1%+11.0 pts
Combat service6341.7%35.7%+6.0 pts
Lay statement1,29136.3%33.9%+2.4 pts
Claimed as secondary25137.1%35.8%+1.3 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 69.1% of the decisions that granted varicose veins.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 36.4% of grants and 13.0% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often varicose veins was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion71131.7%39.7%−8.0 pts
Unfavorable VA exam1,12332.1%51.1%−19.0 pts

Why the Board granted or denied varicose veins

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established20
  2. Caused by the service-connected disability13
  3. Persistent edema incompletely relieved by elevation6
  4. Service connection established6
  5. Beginning stasis pigmentation4
  6. New and material evidence submitted to reopen claim3
  7. Persistent edema3
  8. Continuity of symptomatology since service3

Most common reasons in denials

  1. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim56
  2. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis52
  3. Service records negative or silent46
  4. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service35
  5. Current diagnosis established23
  6. No current diagnosis21
  7. Symptoms relieved by elevation11
  8. Did not meet criteria for higher rating7

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent varicose veins decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26040808R. Bisignani · 2026

Veteran's symptoms analogous to DC 7120 criteria; Benefit of doubt resolved in veteran's favor; Activity-limiting pain reported

Citation Nr. A26032943Jennifer Hwa · 2026

Private medical opinion found varicose veins at least as likely as not due to hypertension; Opinion cited multifactorial pathophysiological process; Opinion was highly probative due to thorough rationale and medical literature

Citation Nr. A26032005Dustin L. Ware · 2026

Resolving reasonable doubt in Veteran's favor; Caused by NSAID use for service-connected conditions; Criteria for service connection met

Denied

Citation Nr. A26037688A. C. Mackenzie · 2026

VA examination findings consistent with 10% rating; Lack of persistent edema or other findings for higher rating; Veteran's lay assertions not more persuasive than objective medical findings

Citation Nr. A26034389Michael A. Pappas · 2026

No current diagnosis of varicose veins in service treatment records.; No complaints, treatment, or diagnosis of varicose veins in post-service records.; Evidence persuasively weighs against finding of varicose veins.; Benefit-of-the-doubt rule not applicable.

Citation Nr. A26033803David H. Robertson · 2026

No in-service complaints or treatment documented in STRs; VA examiner opined less likely than not related to service; Examiner found no correlation with herbicide or jet mechanic exposures

Rules that apply to varicose veins claims

Research your varicose veins case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a varicose veins issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2017–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.