BVA decisions by condition

Uterus disease: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2017 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a uterus disease issue in 1,179 decisions. It granted the uterus disease issue in 18.7% of them, close to the 19.4% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 26.3%, and remanded it in 53.4%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 41.6% were granted.

Decisions

1,179

2017–2026

Granted

18.7%

All conditions: 19.4%

Granted on the merits

41.6%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

53.4%

Denied: 26.3%

Uterus disease outcomes by year

YearIssues decidedGrantedDeniedRemandedOther
2017
81
14.8%38.3%39.5%7.4%
2018
165
16.4%25.5%52.1%6.1%
2019
131
16.0%26.0%53.4%4.6%
2020
137
12.4%33.6%51.8%2.2%
2021
123
13.0%31.7%54.5%0.8%
2022
114
21.1%24.6%53.5%0.9%
2023
142
19.0%19.0%59.2%2.8%
2024
154
22.1%19.5%55.8%2.6%
2025
148
22.3%27.0%49.3%1.4%

Each row counts issues (each condition the Board decided), so the shares add up to 100%. Other: dismissed, withdrawn or no clear outcome. Years with fewer than 50 issues are left out.

Evidence in granted and denied uterus disease decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the uterus disease issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion15876.6%32.4%+44.2 pts
Favorable VA exam13172.0%35.2%+36.9 pts
Treating physician opinion6671.8%39.2%+32.6 pts
Private medical opinion31356.0%34.0%+22.0 pts
Claimed as secondary17143.9%41.4%+2.5 pts
Lay statement95041.2%44.3%−3.1 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 70.6% of the decisions that granted uterus disease.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 36.2% of grants and 9.0% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often uterus disease was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion59737.5%46.6%−9.1 pts
Unfavorable VA exam82937.7%56.3%−18.5 pts

Why the Board granted or denied uterus disease

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established39
  2. Symptoms not controlled by continuous treatment8
  3. Criteria for service connection met6
  4. Already at the maximum schedular rating4
  5. Caused by the service-connected disability4
  6. Symptoms require continuous treatment3
  7. No contrary opinion of record2
  8. New and material evidence received to reopen claim2

Most common reasons in denials

  1. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim45
  2. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service24
  3. No current diagnosis21
  4. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis16
  5. Current diagnosis established13
  6. Service records negative or silent10
  7. Already at the maximum schedular rating7
  8. Evidence persuasively weighs against service connection4

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent uterus disease decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. 26004669Thomas L. English · 2026

Resolving all reasonable doubt in the Veteran's favor; At least as likely as not (approximate balance of evidence); Continuity of symptoms since active service; Supported by post-service treatment records and lay evidence

Citation Nr. A26026074Victoria Moshiashwili · 2026

Probative evidence in favor of finding; Symptoms began in service and continued; Established causal link (nexus)

Citation Nr. 26003654Lesley A. Rein · 2026

Resolving reasonable doubt in Veteran's favor; Uterine fibroids related to in-service pain and heavy bleeding; Nexus established by VA examiner's opinion

Denied

Citation Nr. A26040178Eric S. Leboff · 2026

Existing 10% rating for symptoms requiring continuous treatment is appropriate.; Evidence does not reflect symptoms not controlled by continuous treatment.; No basis for rating in excess of 10%.

Citation Nr. A26036902M. M. Celli · 2026

No current diagnosis or functional impairment found.; No in-service event or continuity of symptomatology.; Lay statements not competent to address medical matters.

Citation Nr. A26029229Frederic P. Gallun · 2026

No in-service fibroid issues in STRs; VA exams found fibroids less likely than not due to service; No nexus to conceded toxic exposures

Rules that apply to uterus disease claims

Research your uterus disease case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a uterus disease issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2017–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.