BVA decisions by condition

Tuberculosis pulmonary chronic: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2017 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a tuberculosis pulmonary chronic issue in 3,411 decisions. It granted the tuberculosis pulmonary chronic issue in 14.0% of them, below the 19.4% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 31.2%, and remanded it in 52.6%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 30.9% were granted.

Decisions

3,411

2017–2026

Granted

14.0%

All conditions: 19.4%

Granted on the merits

30.9%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

52.6%

Denied: 31.2%

Tuberculosis pulmonary chronic outcomes by year

YearIssues decidedGrantedDeniedRemandedOther
2017
293
13.0%43.7%38.6%4.8%
2018
471
10.6%39.9%45.2%4.2%
2019
510
11.4%30.0%54.9%3.7%
2020
475
9.9%31.8%56.0%2.3%
2021
367
12.8%30.0%53.7%3.5%
2022
370
15.9%23.8%57.6%2.7%
2023
343
15.2%21.0%60.3%3.5%
2024
326
20.2%23.6%55.2%0.9%
2025
254
17.3%32.7%48.0%2.0%
2026
108
19.4%40.7%38.0%1.9%

Each row counts issues (each condition the Board decided), so the shares add up to 100%. Other: dismissed, withdrawn or no clear outcome. Years with fewer than 50 issues are left out.

Evidence in granted and denied tuberculosis pulmonary chronic decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the tuberculosis pulmonary chronic issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion44468.0%22.3%+45.7 pts
Favorable VA exam29963.4%25.6%+37.8 pts
Treating physician opinion20958.8%28.2%+30.6 pts
Private medical opinion1,04542.0%24.4%+17.6 pts
Claimed as secondary31933.3%30.8%+2.5 pts
Combat service14332.9%30.8%+2.1 pts
Lay statement2,57826.7%50.9%−24.2 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 70.9% of the decisions that granted tuberculosis pulmonary chronic.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 30.6% of grants and 11.6% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often tuberculosis pulmonary chronic was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion1,53526.3%35.7%−9.4 pts
Unfavorable VA exam2,33926.4%47.3%−20.9 pts

Why the Board granted or denied tuberculosis pulmonary chronic

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established66
  2. Presumptive service connection for lung cancer due to herbicide exposure6
  3. Presumption of soundness not rebutted4
  4. Service connection established4
  5. Pact act presumptive service connection3
  6. Lung cancer is presumptively linked to herbicide exposure3

Most common reasons in denials

  1. No current diagnosis197
  2. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim130
  3. Service records negative or silent92
  4. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service78
  5. Current diagnosis established61
  6. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis58
  7. No nexus to service established9
  8. Criteria for service connection not met9

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent tuberculosis pulmonary chronic decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26039893Michael A. Herman · 2026

Favorable finding of current diagnosis is binding; Credible statements regarding chemical exposure consistent with MOS; Persuasive private medical opinion linking condition to exposures; Inadequate VA medical opinion; Evidence in approximate equipoise, resolved in Veteran's favor

Citation Nr. A26039590David Gratz · 2026

Veteran served in the Army from December 1968 to September 1970.; Veteran has a current diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis.; Veteran contends condition is due to herbicide exposure during service.; VA examination opined less likely than not caused by herbicide exposure.; Private physician opined more than likely a direct result of herbicide exposure.; Board found private opinion adequate and probative.; Evidence in relative equipoise regarding nexus to herbicide exposure.; Benefit of the doubt applied to grant service connection.

Citation Nr. A26036526Jimmy L. Bardin · 2026

Private medical records noted lung scarring from in-service pneumonia; Veteran's testimony of in-service pneumonia and treatment; Private medical opinion linked residuals to service

Denied

Citation Nr. A26039631Lesley A. Rein · 2026

No competent medical evidence of pulmonary fibrosis diagnosis; Objective medical evidence (HRCT, pulmonologist assessment) did not support diagnosis; Veteran's lay assertions of diagnosis were not probative without medical expertise

Citation Nr. A26039085Paul R. Casey · 2026

Pre-June 3, 2025 evidence did not meet criteria for >10% rating.; Post-June 3, 2025 evidence weighed against >60% rating.; VA PFT results (post-bronchodilator FVC 57%, FEV-1 66%) support 60% rating.; Private opinions lacked probative value due to speculation and ignoring risk factors.

Citation Nr. A26037109J. Kirby · 2026

No current diagnosis of chronic bronchitis; VA examiner diagnosed multiple lung nodules; VA treatment records lack diagnosis

Rules that apply to tuberculosis pulmonary chronic claims

Research your tuberculosis pulmonary chronic case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a tuberculosis pulmonary chronic issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2017–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.