BVA decisions by condition

Sleep apnea: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2017 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a sleep apnea issue in 59,712 decisions. It granted the sleep apnea issue in 26.4% of them, above the 19.4% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 21.8%, and remanded it in 50.3%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 54.7% were granted.

Decisions

59,712

2017–2026

Granted

26.4%

All conditions: 19.4%

Granted on the merits

54.7%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

50.3%

Denied: 21.8%

How VA rates sleep apnea

Once service connection is granted, VA assigns a disability rating from the rating schedule: 38 CFR 4.97, diagnostic code 6847 (Sleep Apnea Syndromes (Obstructive, Central, Mixed)). The rating is the same whether the condition is service connected directly or as secondary to another disability.

RatingCriteria
100%Chronic respiratory failure with carbon dioxide retention or cor pulmonale, or; requires tracheostomy
50%Requires use of breathing assistance device such as continuous airway pressure (CPAP) machine
30%Persistent day-time hypersomnolence
0%Asymptomatic but with documented sleep disorder breathing

Text of 38 CFR 4.97 as of Feb 27, 2026. Confirm the current text at the source before relying on it.

Sleep apnea outcomes by year

YearIssues decidedGrantedDeniedRemandedOther
2017
2,161
17.3%33.2%45.3%4.2%
2018
4,854
20.6%28.0%48.6%2.9%
2019
6,385
21.7%25.5%51.1%1.7%
2020
6,183
21.0%26.0%51.6%1.4%
2021
5,783
21.6%24.2%52.6%1.5%
2022
5,884
22.7%19.9%55.8%1.6%
2023
7,049
25.6%17.2%55.6%1.6%
2024
8,715
32.3%15.7%50.5%1.5%
2025
9,769
33.4%19.6%45.8%1.2%
2026
3,601
36.4%20.9%41.2%1.6%

Each row counts issues (each condition the Board decided), so the shares add up to 100%. Other: dismissed, withdrawn or no clear outcome. Years with fewer than 50 issues are left out.

Evidence in granted and denied sleep apnea decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the sleep apnea issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion14,73886.9%33.0%+53.9 pts
Private medical opinion23,21572.3%35.7%+36.6 pts
Claimed as secondary31,44368.0%42.7%+25.3 pts
Buddy statement5,65876.0%52.0%+23.9 pts
Favorable VA exam5,99372.6%51.6%+21.0 pts
Treating physician opinion2,91473.5%53.4%+20.1 pts
Combat service3,33259.7%54.4%+5.4 pts
Lay statement46,26551.4%70.0%−18.6 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 78.2% of the decisions that granted sleep apnea.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 37.7% of grants and 11.5% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often sleep apnea was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion37,38554.8%54.5%+0.3 pts
Unfavorable VA exam45,74353.1%62.3%−9.2 pts

Sleep apnea claimed as a secondary condition

Decisions where sleep apnea was claimed as secondary to another service-connected disability (38 CFR 3.310), by that disability.

Conditions claimed secondary to sleep apnea

Other conditions veterans claimed as caused or aggravated by sleep apnea, with how often the Board granted them.

Why the Board granted or denied sleep apnea

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established2,554
  2. Caused by the service-connected disability1,150
  3. Service connection established1,046
  4. Aggravated by the service-connected disability422
  5. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service315
  6. Service records negative or silent176
  7. Criteria for service connection met134
  8. Continuity of symptomatology since service98

Most common reasons in denials

  1. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis2,414
  2. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service2,313
  3. Service records negative or silent1,790
  4. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim1,245
  5. No current diagnosis1,028
  6. Current diagnosis established712
  7. Aggravated by the service-connected disability216
  8. Criteria for service connection not met153

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent sleep apnea decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. 26005118R. Feinberg · 2026

Obesity found to be a substantial factor in causing or aggravating OSA; Resolving reasonable doubt in veteran's favor; Favorable portions of private and VA opinions considered probative

Citation Nr. 26005125L. B. Cryan · 2026

Service treatment records show complaints of sleep problems during deployment.; Fellow servicemember's statement corroborates snoring, breathing pauses, and fatigue.; Evidence found to be in approximate balance, with doubt resolved in Veteran's favor.

Citation Nr. A26040512Michael Martin · 2026

Private medical opinion linked weight gain to service-connected knee/ankle conditions; Weight gain identified as intermediate step to OSA; Evidence in relative equipoise, doubt resolved in Veteran's favor

Denied

Citation Nr. A26040473M. C. Wilson · 2026

No presumptive service connection (no in-service onset or relation to TERA); Private opinion suggesting link to COPD not considered as COPD claim denied separately; VA examiner found sleep apnea more directly attributable to anatomical factors (narrow oropharynx); VA examiner cited medical literature not establishing causative link between cited toxins and sleep apnea

Citation Nr. A26040482Lesley A. Rein · 2026

Sleep apnea rated under DC 6847; Criteria for >50% rating not met; No indication of chronic respiratory failure, cor pulmonale, or tracheostomy

Citation Nr. A26040502Michael A. Pappas · 2026

Insufficient evidence of current diagnosis of sleep apnea.; VA sleep study negative for obstructive sleep apnea.; Examiner found no current signs or symptoms attributable to sleep apnea.

Rules that apply to sleep apnea claims

Research your sleep apnea case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a sleep apnea issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2017–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.