BVA decisions by condition

Paralysis of the sciatic nerve: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2017 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a paralysis of the sciatic nerve issue in 1,500 decisions. It granted the paralysis of the sciatic nerve issue in 50.5% of them, above the 19.4% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 54.2%, and remanded it in 3.3%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 48.2% were granted.

Decisions

1,500

2017–2026

Granted

50.5%

All conditions: 19.4%

Granted on the merits

48.2%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

3.3%

Denied: 54.2%

Paralysis of the sciatic nerve outcomes by year

YearIssues decidedGrantedDeniedRemandedOther
2017
75
26.7%49.3%8.0%16.0%
2018
140
42.9%45.7%4.3%7.1%
2019
179
41.9%53.6%1.1%3.4%
2020
294
40.8%55.8%2.0%1.4%
2021
295
43.7%51.2%1.4%3.7%
2022
307
46.3%45.9%3.3%4.6%
2023
323
47.7%48.9%1.9%1.5%
2024
438
49.5%46.3%2.7%1.4%
2025
440
45.0%49.3%4.5%1.1%
2026
184
51.1%44.6%3.3%1.1%

Each row counts issues (each condition the Board decided), so the shares add up to 100%. Other: dismissed, withdrawn or no clear outcome. Years with fewer than 50 issues are left out.

Evidence in granted and denied paralysis of the sciatic nerve decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the paralysis of the sciatic nerve issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Favorable VA exam33062.3%44.1%+18.2 pts
Claimed as secondary8059.8%47.6%+12.2 pts
Positive nexus opinion14658.3%47.1%+11.2 pts
Private medical opinion49054.3%45.3%+9.0 pts
Treating physician opinion11656.1%47.5%+8.6 pts
Lay statement1,25448.9%44.7%+4.3 pts
Combat service4947.9%48.2%−0.3 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 55.6% of the decisions that granted paralysis of the sciatic nerve.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 20.2% of grants and 10.9% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often paralysis of the sciatic nerve was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion30340.8%50.0%−9.2 pts
Unfavorable VA exam1,29546.4%60.0%−13.6 pts

Why the Board granted or denied paralysis of the sciatic nerve

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Moderate incomplete paralysis of sciatic nerve23
  2. Moderate incomplete paralysis of the sciatic nerve14
  3. Symptoms approximated moderately severe incomplete paralysis12
  4. Symptoms approximated moderate incomplete paralysis11
  5. Moderately severe incomplete paralysis of sciatic nerve11
  6. Moderate incomplete paralysis9
  7. Service connection established7
  8. Evidence supports moderately severe incomplete paralysis7

Most common reasons in denials

  1. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim56
  2. Moderate incomplete paralysis of sciatic nerve8
  3. Evidence weighed against higher rating7
  4. No evidence of marked muscular atrophy7
  5. Symptoms approximated moderate incomplete paralysis6
  6. No muscle atrophy or trophic changes noted6
  7. Evidence supports moderate incomplete paralysis5
  8. Symptoms consistent with mild incomplete paralysis5

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent paralysis of the sciatic nerve decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26040544Jimmy L. Bardin · 2026

Diminished muscle strength; Hypoactive reflexes; Decreased and absent sensations; Severe pain and paresthesias; No muscle atrophy

Citation Nr. A26040167M. C. Graham · 2026

Resolved reasonable doubt in veteran's favor; Symptoms approximated moderate incomplete paralysis; No muscle atrophy or normal reflexes/strength

Citation Nr. A26040027Christopher Seppanen · 2026

Evidence supports 40 percent rating for left lower extremity sciatic radiculopathy.; Resolving doubt in veteran's favor.; No evidence of marked muscular atrophy for higher rating.

Denied

Citation Nr. A26040515Leetra J. Harris · 2026

Symptoms limited to mild sensory deficits (pain, numbness, paresthesias in right lower extremity).; Normal muscle strength and reflexes documented.; No findings indicative of moderate or greater severity, muscle atrophy, trophic changes, or significant sensory deficits.

Citation Nr. A26039602John Z. Jones · 2026

Current rating is 20 percent; Evidence did not show motor/reflex impairment for severe paralysis; Mild subjective symptoms and sensory deficits noted

Citation Nr. A26038652John Z. Jones · 2026

Denied higher rating for left leg radiculopathy; Evidence against moderate/severe incomplete paralysis; Normal strength, reflexes, sensory exams; only mild intermittent pain

Rules that apply to paralysis of the sciatic nerve claims

Research your paralysis of the sciatic nerve case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a paralysis of the sciatic nerve issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2017–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.