BVA decisions by condition

Hiatal hernia: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2017 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a hiatal hernia issue in 1,911 decisions. It granted the hiatal hernia issue in 49.5% of them, above the 19.4% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 39.5%, and remanded it in 13.6%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 55.6% were granted.

Decisions

1,911

2017–2026

Granted

49.5%

All conditions: 19.4%

Granted on the merits

55.6%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

13.6%

Denied: 39.5%

Hiatal hernia outcomes by year

YearIssues decidedGrantedDeniedRemandedOther
2017
87
27.6%43.7%19.5%9.2%
2018
105
31.4%47.6%17.1%3.8%
2019
98
40.8%40.8%17.3%1.0%
2020
163
42.3%47.2%10.4%0.0%
2021
186
40.3%45.7%14.0%0.0%
2022
174
37.9%44.3%16.1%1.7%
2023
225
44.0%37.3%15.1%3.6%
2024
361
55.4%32.7%11.4%0.6%
2025
502
53.4%36.1%9.6%1.0%
2026
140
56.4%30.0%11.4%2.1%

Each row counts issues (each condition the Board decided), so the shares add up to 100%. Other: dismissed, withdrawn or no clear outcome. Years with fewer than 50 issues are left out.

Evidence in granted and denied hiatal hernia decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the hiatal hernia issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Favorable VA exam33266.6%53.2%+13.4 pts
Positive nexus opinion25166.2%54.1%+12.1 pts
Private medical opinion77660.8%51.7%+9.1 pts
Lay statement1,68456.5%48.9%+7.5 pts
Treating physician opinion12659.6%55.3%+4.3 pts
Combat service6651.9%55.7%−3.8 pts
Claimed as secondary8435.6%56.2%−20.6 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 64.7% of the decisions that granted hiatal hernia.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 33.3% of grants and 16.7% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often hiatal hernia was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion71852.1%57.5%−5.4 pts
Unfavorable VA exam1,61953.3%72.2%−18.9 pts

Why the Board granted or denied hiatal hernia

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Considerable impairment of health34
  2. Symptoms productive of severe impairment of health26
  3. Symptoms productive of considerable impairment of health24
  4. Symptoms met criteria for 30% rating21
  5. Symptoms meet criteria for 30% rating13
  6. Productive of considerable impairment of health13
  7. Considerable impairment of health found12
  8. GERD rated by analogy to hiatal hernia under DC 73468

Most common reasons in denials

  1. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim44
  2. Symptoms did not meet criteria for higher rating29
  3. Symptoms not productive of considerable impairment of health22
  4. Symptoms did not meet criteria for 30% rating20
  5. No evidence of considerable impairment of health16
  6. Symptoms did not meet criteria for considerable impairment of health14
  7. Already at the maximum schedular rating13
  8. Symptoms did not meet criteria for 30% or 60% rating11

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent hiatal hernia decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26040181Marcus N. Fulton · 2026

Symptoms met criteria for 60% rating under DC 7346; Melena with moderate anemia; Pyrosis, reflux, regurgitation, dysphagia, nausea, vomiting; Diarrhea, substernal pain, alternating diarrhea/constipation, abdominal distention; Functional impact on daily life (soiling, concentration, sleep, lethargy); Resolving reasonable doubt in Veteran's favor

Citation Nr. A26039749Shereen M. Marcus · 2026

Pre-amended criteria more favorable; Symptoms cause severe impairment of health; Rated by analogy under DC 7346

Citation Nr. A26039348Colleen M. Glaser-Allen · 2026

Symptoms of pain, vomiting, material weight loss, and melena identified.; Diagnostic Code 7346 (hiatal hernia) applied by analogy as most beneficial.; Veteran's reports of symptoms found probative and outweigh examiners' findings.

Denied

Veteran's GERD symptoms did not meet criteria for 30% rating.; No evidence of persistently recurrent epigastric distress, dysphagia, pyrosis, regurgitation, and substernal pain.; No evidence of considerable impairment of health.

Citation Nr. A26039838B.T. Knope · 2026

Veteran's GERD symptoms did not meet criteria for 30% rating.; Examiners noted no daily symptoms or requirement for daily medication.; Symptoms did not result in considerable impairment of health.

Citation Nr. A26038765D. Smart · 2026

No esophageal stricture documented; Symptoms did not meet criteria for considerable impairment of health; No functional impact on work noted by examiners

Rules that apply to hiatal hernia claims

Research your hiatal hernia case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a hiatal hernia issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2017–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.