BVA decisions by condition

Hernia ventral postoperative: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2017 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a hernia ventral postoperative issue in 725 decisions. It granted the hernia ventral postoperative issue in 15.3% of them, below the 19.4% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 40.1%, and remanded it in 42.8%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 27.6% were granted.

Decisions

725

2017–2026

Granted

15.3%

All conditions: 19.4%

Granted on the merits

27.6%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

42.8%

Denied: 40.1%

Hernia ventral postoperative outcomes by year

YearIssues decidedGrantedDeniedRemandedOther
2017
50
12.0%38.0%48.0%2.0%
2018
106
11.3%39.6%38.7%10.4%
2019
87
9.2%40.2%49.4%1.1%
2020
87
17.2%41.4%40.2%1.1%
2021
73
17.8%37.0%42.5%2.7%
2022
78
20.5%33.3%46.2%0.0%
2023
83
12.0%36.1%49.4%2.4%
2024
80
17.5%42.5%38.8%1.3%
2025
73
19.2%42.5%38.4%0.0%

Each row counts issues (each condition the Board decided), so the shares add up to 100%. Other: dismissed, withdrawn or no clear outcome. Years with fewer than 50 issues are left out.

Evidence in granted and denied hernia ventral postoperative decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the hernia ventral postoperative issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Claimed as secondary10557.4%23.0%+34.4 pts
Positive nexus opinion9048.4%23.8%+24.6 pts
Private medical opinion19040.2%22.8%+17.4 pts
Favorable VA exam8940.3%24.8%+15.4 pts
Lay statement59627.0%32.0%−5.0 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 64.9% of the decisions that granted hernia ventral postoperative.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 38.7% of grants and 14.1% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often hernia ventral postoperative was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion31728.4%26.8%+1.7 pts
Unfavorable VA exam52325.7%38.1%−12.4 pts

Why the Board granted or denied hernia ventral postoperative

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established12
  2. Caused by the service-connected disability8
  3. Criteria for service connection met3
  4. Service connection established2

Most common reasons in denials

  1. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim31
  2. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service22
  3. Service records negative or silent16
  4. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis16
  5. No current diagnosis13
  6. No indication for supporting belt13
  7. Current diagnosis established8
  8. Criteria for compensable rating not met6

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent hernia ventral postoperative decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26038823H.M. Walker · 2026

Grant of service connection based on benefit of the doubt; Related to service; Supported by medical literature on weightlifting and hernia development

Citation Nr. A26032148Michael J. Skaltsounis · 2026

Grant based on presumption of aggravation; Benefit of the doubt resolved in veteran's favor; Incomplete service treatment records heightened Board's obligation

Citation Nr. A26025546Donnie R. Hachey · 2026

Hernia rated under DC 7339; Prior criteria more favorable as hernia was large but not massive; 40 percent rating warranted for large hernia not well supported by belt

Denied

Citation Nr. 26004651Martin B. Peters · 2026

No hernia noted on enlistment examination; Lay reporting of childhood hernia insufficient to overcome presumption of soundness; VA treatment records show hernia diagnosed over four years after service; VA examiner opined hernia not service-related, due to increased intra-abdominal pressure

Citation Nr. A26034379Leetra J. Harris · 2026

No evidence of in-service incurrence or aggravation; Service treatment records silent regarding hernia; Separation examination normal; No competent medical opinion linking hernia to service

Citation Nr. A26028438M. M. Celli · 2026

Healed hernia repair; No recurrence or muscle weakening; No indication for supporting belt

Rules that apply to hernia ventral postoperative claims

Research your hernia ventral postoperative case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a hernia ventral postoperative issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2017–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.