BVA decisions by condition

Hernia inguinal: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2017 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a hernia inguinal issue in 2,365 decisions. It granted the hernia inguinal issue in 11.1% of them, below the 19.4% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 42.8%, and remanded it in 45.3%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 20.6% were granted.

Decisions

2,365

2017–2026

Granted

11.1%

All conditions: 19.4%

Granted on the merits

20.6%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

45.3%

Denied: 42.8%

Hernia inguinal outcomes by year

YearIssues decidedGrantedDeniedRemandedOther
2017
160
9.4%44.4%42.5%3.8%
2018
288
7.3%47.2%42.4%3.1%
2019
336
11.3%42.9%44.0%1.8%
2020
284
10.9%42.3%45.4%1.4%
2021
235
11.1%43.0%44.3%1.7%
2022
275
13.1%30.9%52.7%3.3%
2023
297
11.8%35.7%50.2%2.4%
2024
305
10.2%43.0%45.2%1.6%
2025
227
12.3%48.9%38.3%0.4%
2026
91
15.4%52.7%31.9%0.0%

Each row counts issues (each condition the Board decided), so the shares add up to 100%. Other: dismissed, withdrawn or no clear outcome. Years with fewer than 50 issues are left out.

Evidence in granted and denied hernia inguinal decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the hernia inguinal issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion24243.8%16.8%+26.9 pts
Treating physician opinion10043.9%19.5%+24.4 pts
Favorable VA exam23640.2%17.2%+23.0 pts
Claimed as secondary22433.3%19.7%+13.6 pts
Private medical opinion60028.9%17.4%+11.5 pts
Lay statement1,90520.7%19.7%+1.0 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 66.8% of the decisions that granted hernia inguinal.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 43.5% of grants and 14.5% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often hernia inguinal was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion98718.1%22.8%−4.7 pts
Unfavorable VA exam1,66918.4%30.2%−11.7 pts

Why the Board granted or denied hernia inguinal

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established25
  2. Caused by the service-connected disability6
  3. Criteria for service connection met4
  4. Criteria for 10 percent rating met4
  5. New and material evidence received to reopen claim4
  6. Competent and credible testimony3

Most common reasons in denials

  1. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim97
  2. No current diagnosis71
  3. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis68
  4. Service records negative or silent55
  5. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service48
  6. Criteria for compensable rating not met34
  7. Current diagnosis established30
  8. No hernia detected on examination18

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent hernia inguinal decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. 26004933Eric S. Leboff · 2026

In-service diagnosis of inguinal hernia; Military surgical intervention for hernia; Line of duty determination indicated hernia caused by military fitness program; Evidence in equipoise; doubt resolved in Veteran's favor

Citation Nr. A26037067Marjorie A. Auer · 2026

Evidence in approximate balance warranted resolving doubt in veteran's favor.; Recurrent hernia confirmed by imaging.; Persistent pain and functional limitations documented.

Citation Nr. 26004520Laura E. Collins · 2026

Positive November 2025 VA opinion finding nexus; In-service complaints of pain and diagnosis of hernia; In-service repair noted

Denied

Citation Nr. A26040554Delyvonne M. Whitehead · 2026

Weight of evidence against finding of testicular hernia; No diagnosis of testicular hernia in service treatment or VA records; Epididymitis residuals already service-connected

Citation Nr. A26040160A. P. Simpson · 2026

Examinations found no hernia detected; Veteran's reported symptoms not objectively supported; Evidence weighs against recurrent hernia

Citation Nr. A26038380Matthew W. Blackwelder · 2026

VA examination found no hernias and no need for a supporting belt.; Veteran's reports of pain alone do not warrant a compensable evaluation.; 38 C.F.R. § 4.59 is inapplicable as hernia does not impact a joint.

Rules that apply to hernia inguinal claims

Research your hernia inguinal case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a hernia inguinal issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2017–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.