BVA decisions by condition

Hallux valgus: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2017 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a hallux valgus issue in 834 decisions. It granted the hallux valgus issue in 23.1% of them, above the 19.4% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 55.2%, and remanded it in 23.1%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 29.6% were granted.

Decisions

834

2017–2026

Granted

23.1%

All conditions: 19.4%

Granted on the merits

29.6%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

23.1%

Denied: 55.2%

Hallux valgus outcomes by year

YearIssues decidedGrantedDeniedRemandedOther
2017
111
21.6%55.9%22.5%0.0%
2018
129
16.3%57.4%24.8%1.6%
2019
127
22.8%59.1%18.1%0.0%
2020
130
28.5%57.7%13.8%0.0%
2021
145
28.3%56.6%13.8%1.4%
2022
83
25.3%41.0%33.7%0.0%
2023
106
27.4%43.4%28.3%0.9%
2024
138
20.3%54.3%23.2%2.2%
2025
136
20.6%61.8%17.6%0.0%

Each row counts issues (each condition the Board decided), so the shares add up to 100%. Other: dismissed, withdrawn or no clear outcome. Years with fewer than 50 issues are left out.

Evidence in granted and denied hallux valgus decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the hallux valgus issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion11255.1%25.5%+29.5 pts
Favorable VA exam13153.2%24.7%+28.4 pts
Claimed as secondary8739.0%28.9%+10.1 pts
Private medical opinion23936.4%26.8%+9.5 pts
Treating physician opinion4336.8%29.1%+7.7 pts
Lay statement73029.1%32.9%−3.7 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 57.5% of the decisions that granted hallux valgus.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 28.0% of grants and 14.6% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often hallux valgus was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion43523.8%34.9%−11.1 pts
Unfavorable VA exam70525.8%52.1%−26.4 pts

Why the Board granted or denied hallux valgus

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Already at the maximum schedular rating18
  2. Current diagnosis established10
  3. Service connection established4
  4. Painful motion recognized under 38 c.f.r. § 4.593
  5. Painful motion under 38 c.f.r. § 4.593
  6. Caused by the service-connected disability2
  7. Separate rating warranted2
  8. Separate 10 percent rating warranted2

Most common reasons in denials

  1. Already at the maximum schedular rating111
  2. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim44
  3. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service33
  4. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis23
  5. Service records negative or silent14
  6. Criteria for higher rating not met9
  7. No surgical resection of metatarsal head5
  8. Current diagnosis established5

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent hallux valgus decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26024078M. Donohue · 2026

Restoration of 20 percent rating granted.; Reduction from 20 percent to 10 percent was improper.; Stabilization of rating requirements under 38 C.F.R. § 3.344 applied.

Citation Nr. A26020200Danette Mincey · 2026

Evidence in approximate balance; Benefit of the doubt resolved in Veteran's favor; November 2024 nurse practitioner opinion found probative

Citation Nr. A26017432M. Sorisio · 2026

Surgery contemplated by DC 5280 performed; Evidence supports rating from February 1, 2023; Separate rating warranted

Denied

Citation Nr. A26040694Matthew W. Blackwelder · 2026

STRs silent for foot conditions; Veteran testified no foot pain during service; Post-service diagnosis of hallux valgus; VA exam opined less likely than not related to service; Private opinions lacked specific diagnosis and rationale

Citation Nr. A26029654Kristi L. Gunn · 2026

Preexisting hallux valgus noted at enlistment; No evidence of aggravation during service; Delayed post-service treatment for chronic condition

Citation Nr. A26029174Kristy L. Zadora · 2026

No history of surgery with metatarsal head resection.; No severe hallux valgus equivalent to amputation.; Evidence did not meet criteria for compensable rating.

Rules that apply to hallux valgus claims

Research your hallux valgus case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a hallux valgus issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2017–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.