BVA decisions by condition

Gout: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2017 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a gout issue in 2,985 decisions. It granted the gout issue in 12.3% of them, below the 19.4% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 31.4%, and remanded it in 55.6%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 28.2% were granted.

Decisions

2,985

2017–2026

Granted

12.3%

All conditions: 19.4%

Granted on the merits

28.2%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

55.6%

Denied: 31.4%

Gout outcomes by year

YearIssues decidedGrantedDeniedRemandedOther
2017
211
10.0%30.3%52.6%7.1%
2018
345
9.9%35.7%50.4%4.1%
2019
400
9.5%36.3%52.8%1.5%
2020
409
9.0%37.7%51.3%2.0%
2021
395
11.4%35.9%51.1%1.5%
2022
390
9.2%23.3%66.2%1.3%
2023
463
15.3%30.0%53.1%1.5%
2024
406
15.3%26.8%55.9%2.0%
2025
364
22.5%28.6%48.1%0.8%
2026
194
20.1%24.2%50.5%5.2%

Each row counts issues (each condition the Board decided), so the shares add up to 100%. Other: dismissed, withdrawn or no clear outcome. Years with fewer than 50 issues are left out.

Evidence in granted and denied gout decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the gout issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion44154.4%22.3%+32.1 pts
Favorable VA exam35651.8%23.4%+28.4 pts
Treating physician opinion14053.2%26.6%+26.6 pts
Claimed as secondary64740.6%25.4%+15.2 pts
Private medical opinion87137.9%23.2%+14.7 pts
Combat service15331.0%28.1%+2.9 pts
Lay statement2,38026.8%35.8%−9.0 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 67.7% of the decisions that granted gout.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 35.9% of grants and 12.0% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often gout was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Unfavorable VA exam2,10826.9%33.0%−6.1 pts
Negative nexus opinion1,52425.1%32.4%−7.2 pts

Why the Board granted or denied gout

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established50
  2. Continuity of symptomatology since service21
  3. Caused by the service-connected disability20
  4. Service connection established8
  5. Aggravated by the service-connected disability4
  6. New and material evidence submitted3
  7. Secondary service connection criteria met3
  8. Criteria for service connection met3

Most common reasons in denials

  1. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis134
  2. Service records negative or silent107
  3. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim100
  4. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service85
  5. No current diagnosis69
  6. No continuity of symptomatology39
  7. Current diagnosis established31
  8. Aggravated by the service-connected disability16

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent gout decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26040962G.J. Suh · 2026

In-service onset of gout documented.; VA examiner provided positive nexus opinion.; Gout may affect multiple joints, supporting service connection for right foot.

Citation Nr. A26037796Timothy Cothrel · 2026

Confirmed diagnosis of gout in service; Reasonably related to in-service diagnosis; Competent and credible testimony of in-service onset

Citation Nr. A26035599A. Ishizawar · 2026

Proposed reduction notice was insufficient; AOJ failed to comply with 38 C.F.R. § 3.105(e); Erroneous reduction vacated, prior rating restored

Denied

Citation Nr. A26040887M. Mills · 2026

No current diagnosis of gout; No complaints or treatment for gout during service; VA examiner opined less likely related to toxic exposure

Citation Nr. A26039428G. A. Wasik · 2026

No evidence of gout during service; Earliest diagnosis over 10 years post-service; In-service toe injury inconsistent with gout onset

Citation Nr. A26038170Ray Barto Slabbekorn, Jr. · 2026

Gout diagnosed in bilateral great toes.; Current rating under DC 5017.; Evidence persuasively weighs against rating higher than 10%.

Rules that apply to gout claims

Research your gout case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a gout issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2017–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.