BVA decisions by condition

Glaucoma: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2017 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a glaucoma issue in 3,296 decisions. It granted the glaucoma issue in 10.8% of them, below the 19.4% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 33.4%, and remanded it in 54.7%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 24.5% were granted.

Decisions

3,296

2017–2026

Granted

10.8%

All conditions: 19.4%

Granted on the merits

24.5%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

54.7%

Denied: 33.4%

Glaucoma outcomes by year

YearIssues decidedGrantedDeniedRemandedOther
2017
238
8.4%37.4%50.8%3.4%
2018
323
8.7%39.3%48.0%4.0%
2019
404
8.9%35.9%53.5%1.7%
2020
455
6.8%34.7%56.5%2.0%
2021
406
10.1%36.9%51.5%1.5%
2022
402
10.9%28.6%59.2%1.2%
2023
418
13.4%25.6%58.9%2.2%
2024
317
7.6%33.8%57.4%1.3%
2025
317
18.6%28.4%51.7%1.3%
2026
143
18.9%30.8%49.0%1.4%

Each row counts issues (each condition the Board decided), so the shares add up to 100%. Other: dismissed, withdrawn or no clear outcome. Years with fewer than 50 issues are left out.

Evidence in granted and denied glaucoma decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the glaucoma issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion42758.7%16.2%+42.5 pts
Favorable VA exam36151.2%18.9%+32.3 pts
Treating physician opinion12448.5%23.3%+25.3 pts
Private medical opinion92734.2%19.4%+14.8 pts
Claimed as secondary94328.2%23.3%+4.8 pts
Combat service19923.3%24.5%−1.2 pts
Lay statement2,42221.2%38.3%−17.1 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 70.8% of the decisions that granted glaucoma.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 27.2% of grants and 8.6% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often glaucoma was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion1,80321.0%29.9%−8.9 pts
Unfavorable VA exam2,33722.2%33.1%−10.9 pts

Glaucoma claimed as a secondary condition

Decisions where glaucoma was claimed as secondary to another service-connected disability (38 CFR 3.310), by that disability.

Why the Board granted or denied glaucoma

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established52
  2. Caused by the service-connected disability12
  3. Service connection established8
  4. Service connection granted4
  5. Service records negative or silent3
  6. Criteria for entitlement met3

Most common reasons in denials

  1. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis152
  2. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim145
  3. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service133
  4. Service records negative or silent68
  5. No current diagnosis40
  6. Current diagnosis established40
  7. Criteria for service connection not met17
  8. Evidence persuasively weighs against service connection15

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent glaucoma decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. 26005102Nathaniel Doan · 2026

Aggravated by service-connected PTSD; Favored August 2024 VA opinion linking stress to eye conditions; Overruled negative VA opinions that relied on age and general risk factors

Citation Nr. A26037772Victoria Moshiashwili · 2026

Evidence approximated criteria for 20 percent rating; Benefit of doubt applied due to balanced evidence; Veteran's statements found competent and credible

Citation Nr. A26033415Cynthia M. Bruce · 2026

Evidence in equipoise; Benefit of the doubt applied; In-service refractive error and subsequent glaucoma diagnosis; Potential exacerbation from service-connected psychiatric disorder and orthopedic conditions

Denied

Citation Nr. 26005083G. A. Wasik · 2026

STRs do not document ongoing glaucoma or residuals from in-service left eye injury.; VA ophthalmologists opined less likely than not related to service.; Private orthopedic surgeon's opinion deemed speculative and lacking expertise in ocular diseases.

Citation Nr. A26037936L. Howell · 2026

No nexus to service; No continuity of symptomatology; In-service event transient and resolved

Citation Nr. A26036960Eric S. Leboff · 2026

No nexus to service established; VA examiner opinion against service connection found competent and credible; Veteran's lay statements outweighed by VA opinion

Rules that apply to glaucoma claims

Research your glaucoma case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a glaucoma issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2017–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.