BVA decisions by condition

Fibromyalgia: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2017 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a fibromyalgia issue in 4,196 decisions. It granted the fibromyalgia issue in 16.3% of them, below the 19.4% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 29.1%, and remanded it in 52.8%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 35.8% were granted.

Decisions

4,196

2017–2026

Granted

16.3%

All conditions: 19.4%

Granted on the merits

35.8%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

52.8%

Denied: 29.1%

Fibromyalgia outcomes by year

YearIssues decidedGrantedDeniedRemandedOther
2017
253
11.5%31.6%49.0%7.9%
2018
452
16.4%29.0%51.1%3.5%
2019
476
17.4%27.9%52.3%2.3%
2020
497
14.3%31.2%52.1%2.4%
2021
449
18.7%27.4%51.9%2.0%
2022
453
15.7%26.3%56.7%1.3%
2023
526
16.3%23.8%58.2%1.7%
2024
526
17.3%24.1%56.7%1.9%
2025
453
14.8%37.7%46.4%1.1%
2026
199
21.1%38.2%38.7%2.0%

Each row counts issues (each condition the Board decided), so the shares add up to 100%. Other: dismissed, withdrawn or no clear outcome. Years with fewer than 50 issues are left out.

Evidence in granted and denied fibromyalgia decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the fibromyalgia issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion76859.0%29.0%+30.0 pts
Treating physician opinion32261.8%32.9%+28.8 pts
Favorable VA exam67154.6%30.5%+24.1 pts
Claimed as secondary67552.8%33.9%+18.9 pts
Private medical opinion1,44044.7%30.1%+14.6 pts
Combat service25943.2%35.3%+7.9 pts
Buddy statement13136.5%35.8%+0.7 pts
Lay statement3,46035.4%38.7%−3.3 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 70.3% of the decisions that granted fibromyalgia.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 28.7% of grants and 14.0% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often fibromyalgia was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Unfavorable VA exam3,14034.3%42.8%−8.5 pts
Negative nexus opinion2,18931.5%41.6%−10.2 pts

Why the Board granted or denied fibromyalgia

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established82
  2. Fibromyalgia is a qualifying chronic disability under 38 c.f.r. § 3.31728
  3. Veteran served in southwest asia during persian gulf war26
  4. Already at the maximum schedular rating18
  5. Veteran is a persian gulf veteran15
  6. Caused by the service-connected disability15
  7. Presumptive service connection under 38 c.f.r. § 3.31714
  8. Criteria for service connection met12

Most common reasons in denials

  1. No current diagnosis235
  2. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim94
  3. Already at the maximum schedular rating89
  4. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service72
  5. Current diagnosis established69
  6. Service records negative or silent66
  7. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis57
  8. Criteria for service connection not met43

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent fibromyalgia decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26040500Gayle Strommen · 2026

Persian Gulf Veteran status verified by DoD data.; Fibromyalgia diagnosed in Oct 2020 VA exam.; Fibromyalgia considered qualifying chronic disability under 38 C.F.R. § 3.317.

Citation Nr. A26037374Paul Sorisio · 2026

Private physician diagnosed fibromyalgia and linked it to Veteran's symptoms.; VA examinations were inadequate as they failed to attribute all symptoms and relied on inaccurate factual bases.; Evidence was in approximate balance, warranting benefit of the doubt.; Veteran served in Southwest Asia theater of operations, and fibromyalgia is a presumptive condition for such service.

Citation Nr. A26037299S. Bush · 2026

Veteran's lay statements indicated constant symptoms refractory to therapy.; VA exam noted constant symptoms but rated them episodic, with low probative value.; Benefit of the doubt applied due to approximate balance of evidence.

Denied

Citation Nr. A26038990Jenna Brant · 2026

Service treatment records and VA examinations negative for fibromyalgia.; Private opinion lacked specific symptoms and probative value.; Evidence weighed against a diagnosis of fibromyalgia.

Citation Nr. 26004894Thomas L. English · 2026

Lack of current fibromyalgia diagnosis.; Conflicting medical opinions regarding diagnosis and etiology.; Evidence suggests other causes for pain (tendonitis, muscular injury, somatization).; Lay statements not competent to opine on diagnosis adequacy.

Citation Nr. A26038017T. Raymond · 2026

Veteran already receiving maximum 40% rating under DC 5025.; VA examination did not support exceptional disability picture.; No legal basis for higher schedular rating.

Rules that apply to fibromyalgia claims

Research your fibromyalgia case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a fibromyalgia issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2017–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.