Veterans Law Judge

Judge Shaun S. Speranza: BVA decisions and outcomes

From 2021 to 2026, Veterans Law Judge Shaun S. Speranza signed 3,496 Board decisions covering 6,794 condition issues. The judge granted 30.7% of those issues, denied 18.3% and remanded 48.7%. For the same mix of conditions, the rest of the Board granted 20.3% and remanded 46.6%, so this judge's grant rate is above the Board's and the remand rate is above it.

Decisions

3,496

2021–2026

Issues decided

6,794

One issue per condition per decision

Issues granted

30.7%

Board, same conditions: 20.3%

Issues remanded

48.7%

Board, same conditions: 46.6%

Judges do not choose their cases, and grant rates differ a lot by condition. “Board, same conditions” is what the rest of the Board decided for the same mix of conditions, so the comparison is fair to the judge's docket. This is not a ranking.

Conditions this judge decided most

Each row compares the judge's issues on one condition with the rest of the Board's issues on the same condition. Conditions with fewer than 20 of this judge's issues are left out, because a few decisions can swing the rate.

ConditionIssuesGrantedBoard grantedRemandedBoard remanded
Knee impairment52530.1%17.2%54.5%51.1%
Hearing loss33724.9%19.5%29.4%34.6%
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)29945.8%28.8%30.8%38.1%
Sleep apnea syndromes (obstructive central mixed)28837.5%26.2%48.6%50.3%
Tinnitus26547.9%39.6%20.4%22.8%
Degenerative arthritis of the spine (spondylosis)20635.9%20.6%49.0%46.0%
Hip impairment19022.1%14.3%58.4%53.8%
Intervertebral disc syndrome18233.5%18.6%48.4%48.0%
Hypertension17734.5%17.1%40.7%48.8%
Migraine16451.8%30.1%31.1%42.2%
Shoulder impairment15834.2%14.2%47.5%53.1%
Ankle impairment12030.0%16.8%48.3%50.4%
Diabetes mellitus10230.4%19.9%46.1%40.0%
Peripheral nerve disorders9730.9%20.5%50.5%51.7%
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)9630.2%19.2%46.9%53.0%

Judge Shaun S. Speranza's decisions by year

YearDecisionsGrantedDeniedRemanded
2022
576
37.7%33.0%49.0%
2023
830
43.4%26.4%54.6%
2024
765
42.7%27.2%48.8%
2025
949
50.4%30.0%46.5%
2026
368
55.7%19.6%43.5%

Why the Board granted or denied issues in Judge Shaun S. Speranza's decisions

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established66
  2. In-service noise exposure conceded42
  3. Service connection established41
  4. Continuity of symptomatology since service34
  5. Caused by the service-connected disability22
  6. Service records negative or silent14
  7. Evidence weighs in favor of claim14
  8. Credible lay statements10

Most common reasons in denials

  1. Service records negative or silent66
  2. No current diagnosis48
  3. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service41
  4. Evidence weighs against claim20
  5. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis19
  6. Current diagnosis established15
  7. Already at the maximum schedular rating14
  8. Evidence weighs against earlier effective date11

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent Judge Shaun S. Speranza decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26040941Shaun S. Speranza · 2026

Veteran's lay statements regarding sleep symptoms during service; STRs showing sleep-related symptoms during service; MPRs confirming service locations and dates; VA treatment records showing OSA diagnosis and treatment; Adequate private medical opinion linking OSA to service

Citation Nr. A26040078Shaun S. Speranza · 2026

Service treatment records show in-service complaints of low back pain.; VA examinations were inadequate for failing to address pertinent evidence and provide adequate rationale.; Private medical specialist provided positive nexus opinion linking condition to service.; Veteran and service member lay statements are credible and probative.

Citation Nr. A26040044Shaun S. Speranza · 2026

Competent, credible, and consistent lay statements regarding instability; Need for brace and cane indicates severe recurrent subluxation/lateral instability; Prior version of DC 5257 applied

Denied

Citation Nr. A26040880Shaun S. Speranza · 2026

VA examination findings applied to rating schedule; Results yielded 0 percent disability rating; Exceptional pattern of hearing impairment not shown

Citation Nr. A26040937Shaun S. Speranza · 2026

No current diagnosis of depression per DSM-5 criteria.; Lay statements insufficient to establish diagnosis without medical expertise.; Service treatment records silent regarding depression.

Citation Nr. A26039364Shaun S. Speranza · 2026

Lay statements regarding in-service onset were not credible due to inconsistencies with documented medical history.; VA treatment records show tinnitus onset post-April 2007 motor vehicle accident, not during service.; VA examiner determined tinnitus was less likely than not related to noise exposure or TERA.; Motor vehicle accident with head injury identified as greater risk factor than TERA.; Lack of contemporaneous service treatment records for tinnitus.

Research your Judge Shaun S. Speranza case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Issue rates count each condition the Board decided in a decision once, by the outcome of that issue. A decision can grant one issue and deny another.
  • The yearly table counts decisions: a decision with a granted issue and a denied issue appears in both columns, so a row can add up to more than 100%.
  • "Board, same conditions" weights the rest of the Board's grant and remand rate for each condition by how many of this judge's issues were on that condition. It does not adjust for evidence, hearing type or representation.
  • Judges are identified from the signature on each decision. This page is a statistical summary, not an evaluation of any judge.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2021–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.