BVA decisions by condition

Diabetes mellitus: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2018 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a diabetes issue in 28,083 decisions. It granted the diabetes issue in 20.8% of them, close to the 19.9% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 37.1%, and remanded it in 40.9%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 35.9% were granted.

Decisions

28,083

2018–2026

Granted

20.8%

All conditions: 19.9%

Granted on the merits

35.9%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

40.9%

Denied: 37.1%

Diabetes mellitus outcomes by year

YearDecisionsGrantedDeniedRemanded
2018
3,548
15.3%45.6%35.8%
2019
3,849
18.6%38.7%41.0%
2020
3,759
19.3%37.7%42.2%
2021
3,128
19.3%37.8%42.1%
2022
3,377
23.8%32.5%42.2%
2023
3,487
22.6%33.5%43.1%
2024
3,019
25.0%32.7%42.3%
2025
2,843
21.5%37.4%40.0%
2026
1,073
27.0%35.7%36.6%

Evidence in granted and denied diabetes decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the diabetes issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Buddy statement1,10065.8%34.5%+31.3 pts
Positive nexus opinion3,83859.4%31.2%+28.3 pts
Favorable VA exam2,86851.7%33.6%+18.2 pts
Claimed as secondary6,02048.2%33.8%+14.4 pts
Treating physician opinion1,52747.7%35.1%+12.6 pts
Combat service1,50544.4%35.4%+9.0 pts
Private medical opinion7,92240.9%33.6%+7.4 pts
Lay statement21,51435.0%40.1%−5.2 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 72.2% of the decisions that granted diabetes.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 42.6% of grants and 10.6% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often diabetes was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion10,75726.8%42.1%−15.3 pts
Unfavorable VA exam16,56826.1%54.6%−28.6 pts

Why the Board granted or denied diabetes

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established996
  2. Veteran served in thailand during vietnam era193
  3. Presumed exposure to herbicide agents92
  4. Presumption of herbicide exposure applies53
  5. New and material evidence received to reopen claim51
  6. Criteria for service connection met50
  7. Veteran served in vietnam44
  8. Presumptive service connection for diabetes mellitus due to herbicide exposure41

Most common reasons in denials

  1. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis1,050
  2. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim775
  3. Service records negative or silent768
  4. Va examiner: less likely than not related to service511
  5. No current diagnosis483
  6. No continuity of symptomatology448
  7. Current diagnosis established314
  8. Continuity of symptomatology since service176

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent diabetes decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. 26005121M. Tenner · 2026

Secondary to service-connected chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis, hypothyroidism, and/or hypogonadism; 38 C.F.R. § 3.310 criteria met

Citation Nr. A26040471M. C. Graham · 2026

Private opinion found PTSD contributed to metabolic dysfunction.; Conflicting opinions between VA and private examiners.; Benefit of the doubt resolved in Veteran's favor.

Citation Nr. A26040527P.M. Dilorenzo · 2026

Service-connected disabilities aggravated obesity; Obesity was substantial factor in causing diabetes; Diabetes would not have occurred but for obesity

Denied

Citation Nr. A26040464Jennifer White · 2026

No established in-service event (herbicide exposure); Service treatment records negative for diabetes; No VA examination required due to lack of in-service event

Citation Nr. 26005112Michelle L. Kane · 2026

No evidence of herbicide exposure in Taiwan.; No evidence of radiation exposure.; Condition did not onset during service or within one year of separation.; No continuity of symptoms from service to diagnosis.

Citation Nr. A26040483Lesley A. Rein · 2026

No in-service complaints or diagnosis in STRs; DMII not presumptive for Camp Lejeune TERA; June 2025 VA opinion found DMII less likely than not caused by TERA; Morbid obesity assessed as likely cause of DMII

Rules that apply to diabetes claims

Research your diabetes case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a diabetes issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2018–2026) and can contain errors. Updated automatically as new decisions are added.
  • Research aid, not legal advice. Verify each decision and regulation before relying on it.