Veterans Law Judge

Judge Paul Sorisio: BVA decisions and outcomes

From 2017 to 2026, Veterans Law Judge Paul Sorisio signed 8,315 Board decisions covering 17,126 condition issues. The judge granted 23.4% of those issues, denied 24.0% and remanded 48.5%. For the same mix of conditions, the rest of the Board granted 19.8% and remanded 47.0%, so this judge's grant rate is above the Board's and the remand rate is close to it.

Decisions

8,315

2017–2026

Issues decided

17,126

One issue per condition per decision

Issues granted

23.4%

Board, same conditions: 19.8%

Issues remanded

48.5%

Board, same conditions: 47.0%

Judges do not choose their cases, and grant rates differ a lot by condition. “Board, same conditions” is what the rest of the Board decided for the same mix of conditions, so the comparison is fair to the judge's docket. This is not a ranking.

Conditions this judge decided most

Each row compares the judge's issues on one condition with the rest of the Board's issues on the same condition. Conditions with fewer than 20 of this judge's issues are left out, because a few decisions can swing the rate.

ConditionIssuesGrantedBoard grantedRemandedBoard remanded
Knee impairment1,37624.0%17.2%51.3%51.1%
Hearing loss84027.4%19.4%30.1%34.6%
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)76134.4%28.8%33.9%38.1%
Tinnitus63549.4%39.5%16.9%22.8%
Degenerative arthritis of the spine (spondylosis)62030.3%20.6%42.7%46.1%
Hypertension53117.9%17.1%53.3%48.7%
Sleep apnea syndromes (obstructive central mixed)49030.2%26.2%47.1%50.4%
Intervertebral disc syndrome42023.1%18.6%47.1%48.0%
Migraine39232.1%30.1%45.2%42.1%
Shoulder impairment36319.0%14.3%57.0%53.0%
Ankle impairment33111.5%16.9%58.9%50.3%
Peripheral nerve disorders33126.6%20.5%53.8%51.7%
Hip impairment33025.2%14.2%47.9%53.9%
Diabetes mellitus30824.7%19.9%41.2%40.0%
Major depressive disorder23339.1%34.6%33.5%34.2%

Judge Paul Sorisio's decisions by year

YearDecisionsGrantedDeniedRemanded
2017
700
25.3%42.1%51.6%
2018
945
34.8%41.9%52.9%
2019
932
36.3%40.6%53.9%
2020
970
40.5%32.5%53.5%
2021
903
38.0%30.5%52.6%
2022
766
42.0%26.2%57.3%
2023
900
38.1%28.7%55.4%
2024
883
40.9%28.7%51.1%
2025
937
39.6%32.9%48.0%
2026
379
55.1%26.9%44.6%

Why the Board granted or denied issues in Judge Paul Sorisio's decisions

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established341
  2. Continuity of symptomatology since service147
  3. Service connection established118
  4. Caused by the service-connected disability49
  5. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service24
  6. In-service noise exposure conceded17
  7. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim17
  8. Already at the maximum schedular rating17

Most common reasons in denials

  1. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim409
  2. No current diagnosis195
  3. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service157
  4. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis116
  5. Service records negative or silent94
  6. Current diagnosis established90
  7. Already at the maximum schedular rating46
  8. No continuity of symptomatology37

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent Judge Paul Sorisio decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26040456Paul Sorisio · 2026

Continuity of symptomatology since service; Presumed incurred in service; Positive treating physician opinion; Inadequate VA opinion

Citation Nr. A26040591Paul Sorisio · 2026

Competent evidence of current diagnosis; Veteran's testimony regarding in-service onset and continuity of symptoms is credible; Benefit of the doubt applied due to approximate balance of evidence

Citation Nr. A26040607Paul Sorisio · 2026

Competent and credible lay statements regarding history and continuity; Negative VA nexus opinions based solely on lack of treatment records found inadequate; Benefit of the doubt applied due to approximate balance of evidence

Denied

Citation Nr. A26040774Paul Sorisio · 2026

Criteria for rating in excess of 20% not met; Required oral hypoglycemic agents and insulin; No regulation of activities as part of management

Citation Nr. A26040248Paul Sorisio · 2026

No presumptive link for COPD with herbicide exposure.; VA examiner found COPD less likely than not caused by TERA.; Smoking identified as primary risk factor for COPD.

Citation Nr. A26040082Paul Sorisio · 2026

Current diagnosis of bilateral hearing loss established.; Service treatment records silent for hearing issues.; Normal hearing at enlistment and separation examinations.; VA examiner found hearing loss configuration inconsistent with noise exposure.; VA examiner found onset many years post-service.; VA examiner found low probability of noise exposure for MOS.; VA examiner opinion found less likely than not related to service.; VA examiner deemed competent and credible.

Research your Judge Paul Sorisio case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Issue rates count each condition the Board decided in a decision once, by the outcome of that issue. A decision can grant one issue and deny another.
  • The yearly table counts decisions: a decision with a granted issue and a denied issue appears in both columns, so a row can add up to more than 100%.
  • "Board, same conditions" weights the rest of the Board's grant and remand rate for each condition by how many of this judge's issues were on that condition. It does not adjust for evidence, hearing type or representation.
  • Judges are identified from the signature on each decision. This page is a statistical summary, not an evaluation of any judge.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2017–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.