Veterans Law Judge

Judge Michael Pappas: BVA decisions and outcomes

From 2019 to 2019, Veterans Law Judge Michael Pappas signed 527 Board decisions covering 1,160 condition issues. The judge granted 9.1% of those issues, denied 27.2% and remanded 61.0%. For the same mix of conditions, the rest of the Board granted 19.7% and remanded 46.9%, so this judge's grant rate is below the Board's and the remand rate is above it.

Decisions

527

2019–2019

Issues decided

1,160

One issue per condition per decision

Issues granted

9.1%

Board, same conditions: 19.7%

Issues remanded

61.0%

Board, same conditions: 46.9%

Judges do not choose their cases, and grant rates differ a lot by condition. “Board, same conditions” is what the rest of the Board decided for the same mix of conditions, so the comparison is fair to the judge's docket. This is not a ranking.

Conditions this judge decided most

Each row compares the judge's issues on one condition with the rest of the Board's issues on the same condition. Conditions with fewer than 20 of this judge's issues are left out, because a few decisions can swing the rate.

ConditionIssuesGrantedBoard grantedRemandedBoard remanded
Knee impairment1008.0%17.3%66.0%51.1%
Hearing loss738.2%19.5%53.4%34.6%
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD)5612.5%28.9%57.1%38.1%
Degenerative arthritis of the spine (spondylosis)515.9%20.7%66.7%46.0%
Intervertebral disc syndrome494.1%18.7%61.2%48.0%
Tinnitus4526.7%39.6%35.6%22.7%
Hypertension303.3%17.2%56.7%48.7%
Peripheral nerve disorders270.0%20.6%66.7%51.7%
Shoulder impairment230.0%14.3%87.0%53.0%
Sleep apnea syndromes (obstructive central mixed)2231.8%26.2%50.0%50.3%
Migraine2218.2%30.2%50.0%42.2%
Diabetes mellitus219.5%20.0%42.9%40.1%
Ankle impairment210.0%16.9%47.6%50.4%

Why the Board granted or denied issues in Judge Michael Pappas's decisions

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Continuity of symptomatology since service7
  2. Current diagnosis established4
  3. Service connection established4
  4. Granted earlier effective date2
  5. Competent and credible lay testimony regarding onset in service2

Most common reasons in denials

  1. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service25
  2. Current diagnosis established17
  3. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim16
  4. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis14
  5. Service records negative or silent11
  6. No current diagnosis7
  7. In-service noise exposure conceded4
  8. No continuity of symptomatology3

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent Judge Michael Pappas decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A19003581Michael Pappas · 2019

Evidence of record shows worsening hyperhidrosis.; Veteran's lay statements and private medical records describe difficulty handling tools and paper.; Condition unresponsive to therapy.; Evidence in relative equipoise, doubt resolved in veteran's favor.

Citation Nr. A19003558Michael Pappas · 2019

Veteran has current diagnoses of diabetes mellitus type II and erectile dysfunction.; Veteran served in the Korean DMZ from 1968-1969.; Buddy statements corroborated Veteran's presence in DMZ.; Board conceded Agent Orange exposure based on DMZ service and buddy statements.; Diabetes mellitus type II is a presumptive condition for herbicide exposure.

Citation Nr. A19002849Michael Pappas · 2019

Service-connected PTSD and associated psychiatric disabilities preclude substantially gainful employment.; Veteran's lay statements found credible and consistent with employment record and examiner observations.; Benefit of the doubt resolved in veteran's favor.

Denied

Citation Nr. A19002675Michael Pappas · 2019

Symptoms of depressed mood, anxiety, nightmares, hypervigilance, avoidance, and sleep impairment align with 30% rating criteria.; Veteran did not exhibit reduced reliability/productivity, flattened affect, or significant memory impairment required for 50% rating.; VA examiner's findings of intact judgment and ability to follow conversation support the 30% rating.

Citation Nr. A19002494Michael Pappas · 2019

Bladder cancer in remission with no recurrence or metastasis.; No renal dysfunction or bladder fistula found.; Residuals of voiding dysfunction did not meet criteria for higher rating.

Citation Nr. A19002192Michael Pappas · 2019

Evidence did not support symptoms beyond moderately severe impairment.; June 2018 VA exam found only some impairment of muscle tonus and loss of power.; Absence of objective medical evidence for more than two cardinal signs of muscle injury.

Research your Judge Michael Pappas case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Issue rates count each condition the Board decided in a decision once, by the outcome of that issue. A decision can grant one issue and deny another.
  • The yearly table counts decisions: a decision with a granted issue and a denied issue appears in both columns, so a row can add up to more than 100%.
  • "Board, same conditions" weights the rest of the Board's grant and remand rate for each condition by how many of this judge's issues were on that condition. It does not adjust for evidence, hearing type or representation.
  • Judges are identified from the signature on each decision. This page is a statistical summary, not an evaluation of any judge.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2019–2019) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.