Secondary service connection

Peripheral nerve disorders secondary to diabetes: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2018 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided peripheral nerve disorders claimed as secondary to diabetes in 3,356 decisions. It granted the issue in 34.1% of them, above the 21.5% grant rate for all peripheral nerve disorders issues, denied it in 21.2%, and remanded it in 45.4%. Counting only decisions on the merits, 61.7% were granted.

Decisions

3,356

2018–2026

Granted

34.1%

All peripheral nerve disorders: 21.5%

Granted on the merits

61.7%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

45.4%

Denied: 21.2%

See all peripheral nerve disorders decisions, direct and secondary.

Peripheral nerve disorders secondary to diabetes: outcomes by year

YearDecisionsGrantedDeniedRemanded
2018
439
29.8%27.1%42.1%
2019
508
30.9%16.7%53.7%
2020
467
30.4%21.0%48.8%
2021
421
28.5%21.4%51.1%
2022
445
34.8%19.3%45.4%
2023
403
36.5%24.1%40.9%
2024
336
41.7%19.9%41.1%
2025
252
44.4%19.4%37.7%
2026
85
48.2%24.7%25.9%

Evidence in granted and denied peripheral nerve disorders decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the peripheral nerve disorders issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion67487.6%50.8%+36.8 pts
Favorable VA exam51488.1%53.7%+34.4 pts
Treating physician opinion28686.8%58.6%+28.2 pts
Private medical opinion1,10669.1%57.0%+12.2 pts
Combat service26372.1%60.8%+11.3 pts
Buddy statement15472.1%60.9%+11.2 pts
Lay statement2,58258.0%78.7%−20.7 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 72.4% of the decisions that granted peripheral nerve disorders.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 35.1% of grants and 10.0% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often peripheral nerve disorders was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion1,43855.7%66.4%−10.7 pts
Unfavorable VA exam2,11456.8%71.1%−14.3 pts

Why the Board granted or denied peripheral nerve disorders

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Caused by the service-connected disability337
  2. Current diagnosis established245
  3. Service connection established149
  4. Secondary service connection granted22
  5. Criteria for secondary service connection met17
  6. Service connection for diabetes mellitus granted16
  7. Secondary service connection criteria met11
  8. Diabetes mellitus is service-connected10

Most common reasons in denials

  1. No current diagnosis131
  2. Service records negative or silent66
  3. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis59
  4. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim57
  5. Current diagnosis established44
  6. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service33
  7. Diabetes mellitus not service-connected22
  8. Service connection for diabetes mellitus denied16

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent peripheral nerve disorders decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26040850Timothy Cothrel · 2026

38 C.F.R. § 3.310; Diabetes mellitus is now service-connected; Podiatry note: 'diabetes mellitus with neuropathy'; Endocrinology note: neuropathy as complication of diabetes

Citation Nr. 26005036Marjorie A. Auer · 2026

Diagnosed with bilateral lower extremity diabetic peripheral neuropathy post-service.; Recognized complication of diabetes mellitus.; Private medical opinion confirmed condition is approximately due to Type I diabetes.

Citation Nr. A26039294Cynthia M. Bruce · 2026

Condition is a complication of service-connected diabetes mellitus.; Manifested or diagnosed prior to the 2004 claim.; Effective date of July 14, 2004, granted as it is the later of the claim date and when entitlement arose.

Denied

Citation Nr. 26005112Michelle L. Kane · 2026

Peripheral neuropathy claimed secondary to diabetes mellitus, which was not service-connected.; Condition did not onset during service or within one year of separation.; No continuity of symptoms from service to diagnosis.

Citation Nr. A26035788Ardie A. Bland · 2026

Complication of diabetes mellitus; Veteran not service-connected for diabetes mellitus

Citation Nr. 26004568Steven D. Reiss · 2026

No in-service complaints, findings, treatment, or diagnosis; Diagnosed approximately 30 years post-service; VA opinions found no nexus to service or TERA; Attributed to diabetes mellitus; No evidence of aggravation from service-connected conditions

Rules that apply to secondary peripheral nerve disorders claims

Research your peripheral nerve disorders case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Counts decisions in which the Board decided a peripheral nerve disorders issue claimed as secondary to diabetes, by the outcome of that issue.
  • The primary disability is read from the decision text ("secondary to …") and grouped by name, so spellings such as "PTSD" and "posttraumatic stress disorder" count together.
  • Secondary claims also include aggravation of a non-service-connected condition by a service-connected one (38 CFR 3.310(b)).
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2018–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.