Secondary service connection

Major depressive disorder secondary to a knee condition: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2017 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided major depressive disorder claimed as secondary to a knee condition in 516 decisions. It granted the issue in 49.4% of them, above the 35.3% grant rate for all major depressive disorder issues, denied it in 12.8%, and remanded it in 34.5%. Counting only decisions on the merits, 79.4% were granted.

Decisions

516

2017–2026

Granted

49.4%

All major depressive disorder: 35.3%

Granted on the merits

79.4%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

34.5%

Denied: 12.8%

See all major depressive disorder decisions, direct and secondary.

Major depressive disorder secondary to a knee condition: outcomes by year

YearDecisionsGrantedDeniedRemanded
2017
40
22.5%27.5%37.5%
2018
98
43.9%12.2%38.8%
2019
78
56.4%10.3%29.5%
2020
61
44.3%18.0%36.1%
2021
44
34.1%9.1%54.5%
2022
43
51.2%11.6%34.9%
2023
42
47.6%11.9%40.5%
2024
53
62.3%9.4%28.3%
2025
41
78.0%9.8%12.2%

Evidence in granted and denied major depressive disorder decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the major depressive disorder issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion25094.7%51.8%+42.9 pts
Private medical opinion29686.6%64.8%+21.8 pts
Favorable VA exam10087.1%76.7%+10.4 pts
Lay statement40876.5%90.9%−14.4 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 76.9% of the decisions that granted major depressive disorder.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 20.4% of grants and 13.6% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often major depressive disorder was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Unfavorable VA exam39978.7%81.9%−3.2 pts
Negative nexus opinion30177.4%81.9%−4.5 pts

Why the Board granted or denied major depressive disorder

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Caused by the service-connected disability65
  2. Aggravated by the service-connected disability36
  3. Service connection established26
  4. Current diagnosis established26
  5. New and material evidence submitted4
  6. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service4
  7. Criteria for service connection met3
  8. Criteria for secondary service connection met3

Most common reasons in denials

  1. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim10
  2. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service9
  3. Caused by the service-connected disability6
  4. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis4
  5. No current diagnosis3
  6. Service records negative or silent3
  7. VA examiner provided negative nexus opinion2
  8. Current diagnosis established2

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent major depressive disorder decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26037097Lesley A. Rein · 2026

Private medical opinion found depression secondary to knee issues; Veteran testimony corroborates depression linked to knee pain; Evidence in approximate balance, doubt resolved in Veteran's favor

Citation Nr. A26037085Marjorie A. Auer · 2026

Private physician opinion found condition more likely than not secondary to service-connected injuries.; Evidence found to be in equipoise regarding nexus.; Benefit of the doubt resolved in Veteran's favor.

Citation Nr. A26028339Jonathan Hager · 2026

Current diagnosis of depressive disorder with depressive features, melancholic features, and anxious distress.; Conflicting opinions from private psychologist (favorable nexus) and VA examiner (unfavorable nexus).; Evidence found to be at least evenly balanced.

Denied

Citation Nr. A26007209A. P. Simpson · 2026

No evidence of in-service psychiatric injury or disease.; Veteran's testimony regarding chronic psychiatric symptoms was not credible.; Private psychological evaluation was generalized and speculative.

Citation Nr. A25043023B. D. Watson · 2025

No evidence of mental health issues during service.; Veteran's MDD claimed as secondary to service-connected back and knee pain.; VA examiner provided negative nexus opinion; private opinion found unpersuasive by Board.; Board found VA examiner more credible due to expertise and addressing veteran's history.

Citation Nr. A25018142A. C. Mackenzie · 2025

No current diagnosis of depression; Lay contentions lack probative value without objective medical evidence; Absence of diagnosis suggests symptoms did not begin in service

Rules that apply to secondary major depressive disorder claims

Research your major depressive disorder case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Counts decisions in which the Board decided a major depressive disorder issue claimed as secondary to a knee condition, by the outcome of that issue.
  • The primary disability is read from the decision text ("secondary to …") and grouped by name, so spellings such as "PTSD" and "posttraumatic stress disorder" count together.
  • Secondary claims also include aggravation of a non-service-connected condition by a service-connected one (38 CFR 3.310(b)).
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2017–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.