Secondary service connection

Hypertension secondary to a psychiatric disorder: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2017 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided hypertension claimed as secondary to a psychiatric disorder in 1,789 decisions. It granted the issue in 18.9% of them, close to the 17.6% grant rate for all hypertension issues, denied it in 17.8%, and remanded it in 62.0%. Counting only decisions on the merits, 51.4% were granted.

Decisions

1,789

2017–2026

Granted

18.9%

All hypertension: 17.6%

Granted on the merits

51.4%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

62.0%

Denied: 17.8%

See all hypertension decisions, direct and secondary.

Hypertension secondary to a psychiatric disorder: outcomes by year

YearDecisionsGrantedDeniedRemanded
2017
93
10.8%26.9%57.0%
2018
182
10.4%20.9%65.4%
2019
186
16.1%19.9%63.4%
2020
234
15.8%21.4%61.1%
2021
224
17.9%23.7%56.7%
2022
194
18.6%12.4%68.6%
2023
215
16.7%14.4%68.4%
2024
186
22.6%11.3%66.7%
2025
187
29.4%12.3%57.8%
2026
88
37.5%19.3%43.2%

Evidence in granted and denied hypertension decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the hypertension issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion43084.8%23.9%+61.0 pts
Private medical opinion61868.4%33.3%+35.1 pts
Favorable VA exam21174.0%46.0%+28.0 pts
Treating physician opinion10571.2%49.8%+21.4 pts
Buddy statement4950.0%51.5%−1.5 pts
Combat service8748.3%51.6%−3.3 pts
Lay statement1,36043.8%85.8%−42.1 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 76.0% of the decisions that granted hypertension.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 20.1% of grants and 7.5% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often hypertension was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion1,13646.0%65.2%−19.3 pts
Unfavorable VA exam1,36348.0%70.7%−22.7 pts

Why the Board granted or denied hypertension

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Caused by the service-connected disability61
  2. Current diagnosis established44
  3. Service connection established36
  4. Aggravated by the service-connected disability20
  5. Hypertension diagnosed5
  6. Service records negative or silent4
  7. Evidence evenly balanced4
  8. Secondary service connection granted3

Most common reasons in denials

  1. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service67
  2. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis47
  3. Service records negative or silent35
  4. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim29
  5. Aggravated by the service-connected disability13
  6. No current diagnosis13
  7. No continuity of symptomatology13
  8. Continuity of symptomatology since service10

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent hypertension decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26038343Yvette R. White · 2026

New and relevant evidence submitted in December 2024 warranted readjudication.; In-service elevated blood pressure readings noted.; Veteran provided competent and credible lay statements of continuity of symptomatology.; Evidence found to be in equipoise, resolving doubt in Veteran's favor.

Citation Nr. A26037676R. Feinberg · 2026

Competent diagnosis of hypertension since October 1999.; Presumed herbicide exposure due to Vietnam service.; Probiric February 2020 VA examiner opinions linking anxiety/PTSD to hypertension.; Resolving all doubt in Veteran's favor.

Citation Nr. A26035885G. A. Wasik · 2026

Hypertension diagnosed.; Evidence divided on secondary link to depression.; VA opinion found unlikely due to pre-existing depression; Board found opinion limited.; Private opinion supported link.; Approximate balance of evidence invoked benefit of doubt.

Denied

Citation Nr. A26039336Ray Barto Slabbekorn, Jr. · 2026

No evidence of in-service chronicity, manifestation within presumptive period, or continuity of symptomatology.; Service treatment records silent regarding hypertension; post-service diagnosis years later.; No evidence of herbicide exposure to support presumptive claim.

Citation Nr. A26039704J.P. Norman · 2026

No competent positive nexus opinion; VA examiner opined less likely than not caused by toxic exposure; Hypertension attributed to lifestyle factors

Citation Nr. A26034578J. Kirby · 2026

No in-service hypertension diagnosis; Negative VA nexus opinion; Psychiatric condition not service-connected

Rules that apply to secondary hypertension claims

Research your hypertension case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Counts decisions in which the Board decided a hypertension issue claimed as secondary to a psychiatric disorder, by the outcome of that issue.
  • The primary disability is read from the decision text ("secondary to …") and grouped by name, so spellings such as "PTSD" and "posttraumatic stress disorder" count together.
  • Secondary claims also include aggravation of a non-service-connected condition by a service-connected one (38 CFR 3.310(b)).
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2017–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.