Secondary service connection

Hypertension secondary to diabetes: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2018 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided hypertension claimed as secondary to diabetes in 2,496 decisions. It granted the issue in 16.1% of them, below the 18.3% grant rate for all hypertension issues, denied it in 22.9%, and remanded it in 59.7%. Counting only decisions on the merits, 41.3% were granted.

Decisions

2,496

2018–2026

Granted

16.1%

All hypertension: 18.3%

Granted on the merits

41.3%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

59.7%

Denied: 22.9%

See all hypertension decisions, direct and secondary.

Hypertension secondary to diabetes: outcomes by year

YearDecisionsGrantedDeniedRemanded
2018
470
13.4%33.2%50.9%
2019
411
13.4%17.0%67.2%
2020
474
9.5%25.7%63.7%
2021
459
11.3%25.3%62.3%
2022
304
19.7%17.4%63.2%
2023
170
32.9%13.5%54.1%
2024
98
29.6%15.3%53.1%
2025
75
38.7%18.7%41.3%
2026
35
34.3%5.7%60.0%

Evidence in granted and denied hypertension decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the hypertension issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion46986.1%19.7%+66.4 pts
Favorable VA exam28483.9%30.3%+53.6 pts
Treating physician opinion14465.4%39.1%+26.4 pts
Private medical opinion76753.9%32.6%+21.3 pts
Combat service21445.3%40.8%+4.4 pts
Lay statement1,68434.8%62.6%−27.8 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 76.6% of the decisions that granted hypertension.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 20.9% of grants and 6.3% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often hypertension was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion1,50631.6%61.5%−29.9 pts
Unfavorable VA exam1,80535.3%65.3%−30.0 pts

Why the Board granted or denied hypertension

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Caused by the service-connected disability69
  2. Current diagnosis established50
  3. Service connection established37
  4. Aggravated by the service-connected disability32
  5. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service4
  6. New and material evidence submitted to reopen claim4
  7. Hypertension diagnosed4
  8. Veteran diagnosed with hypertension3

Most common reasons in denials

  1. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service122
  2. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis97
  3. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim60
  4. Service records negative or silent53
  5. Aggravated by the service-connected disability26
  6. No continuity of symptomatology20
  7. Continuity of symptomatology since service13
  8. No current diagnosis12

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent hypertension decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26040129W. Daknis · 2026

VA examiner's opinion on hypertension was inadequate.; Board found Veteran's hypertension secondary to DMII based on multiple opinions.; November 2023 opinion noted DMII likely worsened kidney disease and hypertension.

Citation Nr. 26005076L. M. Barnard · 2026

Granted secondary to DM; VA clinicians opined DM causes/aggravates hypertension; Resolved doubt in Veteran's favor

Citation Nr. 26003998Ryan T. Kessel · 2026

Hypertension aggravated by service-connected diabetes; Favorable VA opinion on secondary aggravation; Equipoise standard met

Denied

Citation Nr. 26005112Michelle L. Kane · 2026

Hypertension claimed secondary to diabetes mellitus, which was not service-connected.; Condition did not onset during service or within one year of separation.; No continuity of symptoms from service to diagnosis.

Citation Nr. A26004251Steven D. Reiss · 2026

No evidence of in-service incurrence or aggravation; Condition diagnosed many years after service; Chronic kidney disease noted as secondary to hypertension and diabetes

Citation Nr. A25110534J. Parker · 2025

No in-service diagnosis or complaints of hypertension.; Hypertension manifested decades after service, not continuously or within one year of separation.; No direct nexus between hypertension and service or toxic exposures.; Secondary claim to diabetes denied as diabetes is not service-connected.

Rules that apply to secondary hypertension claims

Research your hypertension case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Counts decisions in which the Board decided a hypertension issue claimed as secondary to diabetes, by the outcome of that issue.
  • The primary disability is read from the decision text ("secondary to …") and grouped by name, so spellings such as "PTSD" and "posttraumatic stress disorder" count together.
  • Secondary claims also include aggravation of a non-service-connected condition by a service-connected one (38 CFR 3.310(b)).
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2018–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.