Secondary service connection

Hip impairment secondary to a back condition: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2018 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided hip impairment claimed as secondary to a back condition in 1,889 decisions. It granted the issue in 14.6% of them, close to the 16.2% grant rate for all hip impairment issues, denied it in 18.7%, and remanded it in 66.3%. Counting only decisions on the merits, 43.8% were granted.

Decisions

1,889

2018–2026

Granted

14.6%

All hip impairment: 16.2%

Granted on the merits

43.8%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

66.3%

Denied: 18.7%

See all hip impairment decisions, direct and secondary.

Hip impairment secondary to a back condition: outcomes by year

YearDecisionsGrantedDeniedRemanded
2018
198
6.6%22.7%68.7%
2019
197
11.2%22.8%65.5%
2020
235
9.8%24.7%65.1%
2021
267
10.5%18.4%70.4%
2022
222
15.8%16.2%67.6%
2023
262
14.9%15.3%70.2%
2024
224
16.1%17.0%67.0%
2025
197
25.4%15.2%58.9%
2026
87
33.3%13.8%52.9%

Evidence in granted and denied hip impairment decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the hip impairment issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion35386.1%20.5%+65.6 pts
Favorable VA exam21579.7%35.5%+44.2 pts
Private medical opinion61457.5%33.1%+24.3 pts
Treating physician opinion10259.6%42.5%+17.1 pts
Buddy statement6352.2%43.5%+8.7 pts
Combat service6642.1%43.8%−1.7 pts
Lay statement1,57539.4%67.3%−27.9 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 73.8% of the decisions that granted hip impairment.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 25.5% of grants and 14.7% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often hip impairment was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Unfavorable VA exam1,56243.1%48.7%−5.6 pts
Negative nexus opinion1,28139.8%55.8%−15.9 pts

Why the Board granted or denied hip impairment

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Caused by the service-connected disability69
  2. Current diagnosis established40
  3. Service connection established34
  4. Aggravated by the service-connected disability18
  5. Service records negative or silent4
  6. Secondary service connection granted4
  7. Service connection granted3
  8. Resolving all doubt in veteran's favor3

Most common reasons in denials

  1. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service69
  2. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis53
  3. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim50
  4. Service records negative or silent36
  5. No current diagnosis33
  6. Aggravated by the service-connected disability29
  7. No continuity of symptomatology10
  8. Current diagnosis established10

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent hip impairment decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26040917Yvette R. White · 2026

Private medical opinion provided favorable nexus; Equipoise resolved in Veteran's favor; Secondary to service-connected lumbar spine disability

Citation Nr. A26039796John Z. Jones · 2026

Favorable finding of hip condition from AOJ; VA opinion inadequate (unsupported by rationale, conclusory); Competent and credible private opinion linked hip disability to back disability (hip-spine syndrome)

Citation Nr. A26037742S. Sorathia · 2026

Service-connected lumbar spine disability.; Private opinion found bursitis proximately due to lumbar spine disability.; Benefit of the doubt afforded.

Denied

Citation Nr. A26034621M. Mills · 2026

Favorable AOJ finding for diagnosis of myofascial syndrome.; Negative nexus opinions from VA examiners (Feb 2023, Sep 2024).; Private opinion less persuasive due to lack of baseline severity analysis.

Citation Nr. A26030936A. Ishizawar · 2026

Lack of service treatment records for hip condition; Hip condition likely due to post-service factors; No service connection for primary low back condition

Citation Nr. 26003815G. E. Wilkerson · 2026

No current diagnosis of left hip disability found in VA or private treatment records.; Subjective left hip pain reported by Veteran, but no evidence of functional impairment of earning capacity.; Evidence weighs against the claim, making benefit-of-the-doubt rule inapplicable.

Rules that apply to secondary hip impairment claims

Research your hip impairment case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Counts decisions in which the Board decided a hip impairment issue claimed as secondary to a back condition, by the outcome of that issue.
  • The primary disability is read from the decision text ("secondary to …") and grouped by name, so spellings such as "PTSD" and "posttraumatic stress disorder" count together.
  • Secondary claims also include aggravation of a non-service-connected condition by a service-connected one (38 CFR 3.310(b)).
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2018–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.