Secondary service connection

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) secondary to PTSD: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2018 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) claimed as secondary to PTSD in 1,173 decisions. It granted the issue in 26.3% of them, above the 20.0% grant rate for all gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) issues, denied it in 11.9%, and remanded it in 60.5%. Counting only decisions on the merits, 68.8% were granted.

Decisions

1,173

2018–2026

Granted

26.3%

All gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): 20.0%

Granted on the merits

68.8%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

60.5%

Denied: 11.9%

See all gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) decisions, direct and secondary.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) secondary to PTSD: outcomes by year

YearDecisionsGrantedDeniedRemanded
2018
84
14.3%21.4%64.3%
2019
102
10.8%18.6%69.6%
2020
122
17.2%18.9%63.9%
2021
120
16.7%23.3%60.0%
2022
124
19.4%8.1%66.9%
2023
112
26.8%6.3%66.1%
2024
179
29.6%8.4%62.0%
2025
245
39.2%6.1%52.7%
2026
85
49.4%5.9%44.7%

Evidence in granted and denied gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion33191.8%38.3%+53.5 pts
Private medical opinion42085.8%45.2%+40.6 pts
Favorable VA exam14179.8%65.9%+13.9 pts
Treating physician opinion6278.9%67.9%+11.1 pts
Combat service11561.7%69.9%−8.3 pts
Lay statement87064.3%85.4%−21.1 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 81.6% of the decisions that granted gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 24.3% of grants and 17.1% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion83768.7%69.2%−0.5 pts
Unfavorable VA exam99467.5%85.3%−17.8 pts

Why the Board granted or denied gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established39
  2. Service connection established28
  3. Caused by the service-connected disability16
  4. Aggravated by the service-connected disability12
  5. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service5
  6. Private opinion found GERD secondary to PTSD4
  7. Criteria for secondary service connection met4
  8. Secondary to PTSD4

Most common reasons in denials

  1. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service28
  2. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis26
  3. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim22
  4. No current diagnosis15
  5. Service records negative or silent10
  6. Current diagnosis established5
  7. Aggravated by the service-connected disability4
  8. Continuity of symptomatology since service2

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26034826Michael J. Skaltsounis · 2026

Private opinion found probative for GERD etiology; Link between PTSD and GERD explained via sympathetic nervous system; Benefit of the doubt applied

Citation Nr. A26033219Gayle Strommen · 2026

Secondary to service-connected PTSD; Private medical opinion found probative; At least as likely as not caused by PTSD

Citation Nr. A26030400J.P. Norman · 2026

Conflicting medical opinions from private psychologist and VA examiner.; Board found evidence evenly balanced.; Applied benefit-of-the-doubt rule.; AOJ committed pre-decisional error in development of secondary claims.

Denied

Citation Nr. A26036828Jonathan B. Kramer · 2026

No in-service complaints or treatment for GERD.; Post-service VA records show denial of GERD symptoms until April 2024.; Veteran's assertion of nexus to PTSD is not medically competent.; No competent medical evidence links GERD to PTSD.; Evidence persuasively weighs against secondary service connection.

Citation Nr. A26017941J.P. Norman · 2026

No in-service diagnosis or complaints of GERD; Less likely than not nexus to service; GERD not a MUCMI for presumptive service connection

Citation Nr. A26016382J. Kirby · 2026

Veteran denied frequent indigestion/heartburn in post-deployment assessments.; VA examiners opined GERD unrelated to PTSD and not aggravated by it.; Obesity identified as a risk factor for GERD.

Rules that apply to secondary gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) claims

Research your gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Counts decisions in which the Board decided a gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) issue claimed as secondary to PTSD, by the outcome of that issue.
  • The primary disability is read from the decision text ("secondary to …") and grouped by name, so spellings such as "PTSD" and "posttraumatic stress disorder" count together.
  • Secondary claims also include aggravation of a non-service-connected condition by a service-connected one (38 CFR 3.310(b)).
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2018–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.