Secondary service connection

Ankle impairment secondary to flat feet: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2017 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided ankle impairment claimed as secondary to flat feet in 332 decisions. It granted the issue in 19.0% of them, close to the 17.8% grant rate for all ankle impairment issues, denied it in 14.2%, and remanded it in 66.9%. Counting only decisions on the merits, 57.3% were granted.

Decisions

332

2017–2026

Granted

19.0%

All ankle impairment: 17.8%

Granted on the merits

57.3%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

66.9%

Denied: 14.2%

See all ankle impairment decisions, direct and secondary.

Ankle impairment secondary to flat feet: outcomes by year

YearDecisionsGrantedDeniedRemanded
2017
33
6.1%24.2%66.7%
2018
28
14.3%7.1%75.0%
2019
30
26.7%10.0%63.3%
2020
38
10.5%26.3%65.8%
2021
33
15.2%18.2%69.7%
2022
37
24.3%8.1%64.9%
2023
37
24.3%10.8%67.6%
2024
41
14.6%12.2%73.2%
2025
40
27.5%12.5%60.0%

Evidence in granted and denied ankle impairment decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the ankle impairment issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion7188.9%35.4%+53.5 pts
Favorable VA exam4083.3%50.0%+33.3 pts
Private medical opinion12966.7%44.7%+22.0 pts
Lay statement26353.8%73.7%−19.8 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 76.2% of the decisions that granted ankle impairment.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 15.9% of grants and 12.8% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often ankle impairment was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion22856.7%60.0%−3.3 pts
Unfavorable VA exam26756.1%66.7%−10.5 pts

Why the Board granted or denied ankle impairment

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Caused by the service-connected disability17
  2. Current diagnosis established8
  3. Service connection established8

Most common reasons in denials

  1. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim8
  2. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service8
  3. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis7
  4. No current diagnosis4
  5. Service records negative or silent3
  6. Pes planus not service-connected2
  7. Claim for secondary service connection denied as the primary foot condition is not service-connected1
  8. Delayed onset of symptoms years after service1

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent ankle impairment decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. 26003894Emily Tamlyn · 2026

October 2025 VA examination reflects ankylosis of left ankle, degenerative arthritis of left ankle, and bilateral ankle strain.; October 2025 medical opinion provided positive nexus stating ankle disability would be less severe and result in less functional impairment if service-connected pes planus or plantar fasciitis were absent.; November 2025 VA examination and opinion were found insufficient.

Citation Nr. A26024725Harvey P. Roberts · 2026

Private medical opinion found pes planus contributed to ankle injury; VA exam conflicted but lacked supporting literature; Board found private opinion highly persuasive due to rationale

Citation Nr. 26003453Paulette Vance Burton · 2026

Current disability shown by pain causing functional impairment; November 2022 VA exam opinion links pain to service-connected conditions; Service treatment records silent, but post-service and later VA exams noted ankle issues

Denied

Citation Nr. A26038001A. J. Spector · 2026

Evidence persuasively weighs against service connection; Evidence persuasively weighs against secondary connection to pes planus

Citation Nr. 25013896David H. Robertson · 2025

No chronic in-service symptoms; No continuity of symptomatology after service; No etiologically related to service; Not aggravated by service-connected conditions

Citation Nr. A25081029J.W. Zissimos · 2025

Service treatment records negative for ankle disorder; April 2010 medical evaluation found ankles normal; November 2022 VA exam found no current ankle disorder

Rules that apply to secondary ankle impairment claims

Research your ankle impairment case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Counts decisions in which the Board decided a ankle impairment issue claimed as secondary to flat feet, by the outcome of that issue.
  • The primary disability is read from the decision text ("secondary to …") and grouped by name, so spellings such as "PTSD" and "posttraumatic stress disorder" count together.
  • Secondary claims also include aggravation of a non-service-connected condition by a service-connected one (38 CFR 3.310(b)).
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2017–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.