BVA decisions by condition

Uterus removal: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2018 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a uterus removal issue in 561 decisions. It granted the uterus removal issue in 17.8% of them, below the 19.9% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 29.1%, and remanded it in 51.9%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 38.0% were granted.

Decisions

561

2018–2026

Granted

17.8%

All conditions: 19.9%

Granted on the merits

38.0%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

51.9%

Denied: 29.1%

Uterus removal outcomes by year

YearDecisionsGrantedDeniedRemanded
2018
68
7.4%33.8%54.4%
2019
73
16.4%32.9%50.7%
2020
57
17.5%38.6%40.4%
2021
54
11.1%38.9%50.0%
2022
55
14.5%16.4%63.6%
2023
70
17.1%28.6%55.7%
2024
84
20.2%22.6%58.3%
2025
76
25.0%25.0%48.7%

Evidence in granted and denied uterus removal decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the uterus removal issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion9367.7%28.9%+38.9 pts
Claimed as secondary12766.7%31.1%+35.5 pts
Private medical opinion18755.9%28.2%+27.7 pts
Favorable VA exam7853.4%33.7%+19.8 pts
Lay statement45138.7%34.8%+3.9 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 61.0% of the decisions that granted uterus removal.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 20.0% of grants and 12.9% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often uterus removal was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion28538.6%37.4%+1.2 pts
Unfavorable VA exam39734.5%50.0%−15.5 pts

Why the Board granted or denied uterus removal

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established12
  2. Caused by the service-connected disability8
  3. Service connection established4
  4. Already at the maximum schedular rating2
  5. No contrary opinion of record2
  6. Met criteria for 50 percent rating under DC 76172
  7. Etiologically related to service2
  8. Hysterectomy performed for endometriosis2

Most common reasons in denials

  1. Already at the maximum schedular rating28
  2. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim18
  3. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service10
  4. Current diagnosis established7
  5. Service records negative or silent7
  6. No current diagnosis5
  7. Evidence persuasively weighs against service connection4
  8. Denied increased rating3

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent uterus removal decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26038006Michael Martin · 2026

New and relevant evidence received; Partial hysterectomy caused by service-connected fibroids; Probative private medical opinion

Citation Nr. 26003654Lesley A. Rein · 2026

Resolving reasonable doubt in Veteran's favor; Hysterectomy related to in-service pain and heavy bleeding; Nexus established by VA examiner's opinion

Citation Nr. A26021022D. Martz Ames · 2026

Met criteria for 50 percent rating under DC 7617.; Effective date of September 16, 2024, granted.; 100 percent criteria not met due to expired 3-month period.

Denied

Citation Nr. A26039656Amanda G. Alderman · 2026

Evidence persuasively weighs against service connection; No indication of in-service onset, relation, or aggravation

Citation Nr. A26034424Ann K. Minami · 2026

Veteran seeking increased rating for hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.; Currently rated 50% under DC 7617.; DC 7617 allows 100% for 3 months post-surgery, then 50%.; Claim filed after the 3-month period, so 50% is maximum.

Citation Nr. A26019120S. Charles Neill · 2026

Veteran already receiving maximum schedular rating (50%).; No evidence supports higher or extraschedular rating.; Evidence persuasively against rating in excess of 50%.

Rules that apply to uterus removal claims

Research your uterus removal case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a uterus removal issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2018–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.