BVA decisions by condition

Tibia and fibula impairment: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2018 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a tibia and fibula impairment issue in 1,145 decisions. It granted the tibia and fibula impairment issue in 19.2% of them, close to the 19.9% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 31.5%, and remanded it in 50.4%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 37.9% were granted.

Decisions

1,145

2018–2026

Granted

19.2%

All conditions: 19.9%

Granted on the merits

37.9%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

50.4%

Denied: 31.5%

Tibia and fibula impairment outcomes by year

YearDecisionsGrantedDeniedRemanded
2018
135
12.6%34.8%51.9%
2019
168
15.5%33.3%50.0%
2020
155
18.7%36.8%45.8%
2021
120
16.7%35.8%49.2%
2022
107
21.5%12.1%70.1%
2023
151
22.5%27.2%51.0%
2024
131
19.8%29.8%52.7%
2025
124
23.4%37.1%41.9%
2026
54
29.6%35.2%37.0%

Evidence in granted and denied tibia and fibula impairment decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the tibia and fibula impairment issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Favorable VA exam13454.6%34.5%+20.1 pts
Positive nexus opinion12455.1%35.5%+19.5 pts
Treating physician opinion4350.0%37.4%+12.6 pts
Claimed as secondary7948.0%37.4%+10.6 pts
Combat service4546.7%37.6%+9.0 pts
Lay statement94238.1%36.7%+1.4 pts
Private medical opinion27935.0%38.9%−3.9 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 53.6% of the decisions that granted tibia and fibula impairment.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 30.0% of grants and 12.7% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often tibia and fibula impairment was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion48230.3%43.3%−13.0 pts
Unfavorable VA exam85535.5%49.5%−14.0 pts

Why the Board granted or denied tibia and fibula impairment

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established9
  2. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim4
  3. Rated by analogy under DC 52624
  4. Criteria for service connection met4
  5. Caused by the service-connected disability3
  6. Rated by analogy to DC 52622
  7. Difficulty with prolonged standing/walking2
  8. Service connection established2

Most common reasons in denials

  1. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim34
  2. No current diagnosis32
  3. Current diagnosis established18
  4. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis16
  5. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service14
  6. Service records negative or silent7
  7. Criteria for service connection not met5
  8. No evidence of malunion of tibia and fibula3

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent tibia and fibula impairment decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26040529M. Hyland · 2026

New and material evidence submitted; Supports direct service connection; Resolving reasonable doubt in veteran's favor

Citation Nr. A26038876E. I. Velez · 2026

Instability and pain were predominant symptoms.; DC 5262 (impairment of tibia and fibula) is more appropriate by analogy than DC 5271.; Symptoms more nearly depicted marked disability (30 percent) under DC 5262.

Citation Nr. A26034315P.M. Dilorenzo · 2026

Severance of service connection requires clear and unmistakable error.; September 2020 VA opinion found inadequate for failing to address aggravation and all treatment records.; Conflicting evidence regarding nexus and aggravation means severance burden not met.

Denied

Citation Nr. A26040371L. M. Barnard · 2026

Criteria for initial compensable rating not met

Citation Nr. A26033382John J. Crowley · 2026

No current diagnosis of a left leg disability.; No service treatment records or post-service treatment records reflecting a left leg disability.; No diagnosis of left leg stress fracture or tibial/fibular impairment.

Citation Nr. A26029634L.M. Yasui · 2026

No evidence of nonunion or approximating symptoms; Evidence did not support higher rating; Existing 30% rating for impairment considered adequate

Rules that apply to tibia and fibula impairment claims

Research your tibia and fibula impairment case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a tibia and fibula impairment issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2018–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.