BVA decisions by condition

Thyroid enlargement toxic (graves' disease or thyrotoxicosis): BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2018 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a thyroid enlargement toxic (graves' disease or thyrotoxicosis) issue in 1,142 decisions. It granted the thyroid enlargement toxic (graves' disease or thyrotoxicosis) issue in 13.0% of them, below the 19.9% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 24.7%, and remanded it in 60.9%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 34.4% were granted.

Decisions

1,142

2018–2026

Granted

13.0%

All conditions: 19.9%

Granted on the merits

34.4%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

60.9%

Denied: 24.7%

Thyroid enlargement toxic (graves' disease or thyrotoxicosis) outcomes by year

YearDecisionsGrantedDeniedRemanded
2018
111
7.2%31.5%57.7%
2019
125
6.4%29.6%61.6%
2020
119
5.0%25.2%67.2%
2021
141
17.0%23.4%58.2%
2022
127
17.3%18.9%63.0%
2023
155
11.0%27.7%60.6%
2024
159
13.8%17.0%66.7%
2025
161
19.3%28.0%53.4%

Evidence in granted and denied thyroid enlargement toxic (graves' disease or thyrotoxicosis) decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the thyroid enlargement toxic (graves' disease or thyrotoxicosis) issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion17078.4%20.7%+57.7 pts
Favorable VA exam10573.6%26.5%+47.1 pts
Treating physician opinion6668.6%31.4%+37.2 pts
Private medical opinion33852.4%25.4%+27.0 pts
Combat service5235.0%34.4%+0.6 pts
Claimed as secondary20930.8%34.9%−4.2 pts
Lay statement80829.8%46.6%−16.8 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 70.3% of the decisions that granted thyroid enlargement toxic (graves' disease or thyrotoxicosis).
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 22.3% of grants and 9.6% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often thyroid enlargement toxic (graves' disease or thyrotoxicosis) was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Unfavorable VA exam69733.3%36.8%−3.5 pts
Negative nexus opinion52731.6%37.6%−6.0 pts

Why the Board granted or denied thyroid enlargement toxic (graves' disease or thyrotoxicosis)

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established27
  2. Criteria for service connection met3
  3. Service connection established3
  4. Presumed herbicide exposure due to vietnam service2
  5. Onset in service established2
  6. Favorable VA examination opinion2
  7. Benefit-of-the-doubt rule applied2
  8. Already at the maximum schedular rating2

Most common reasons in denials

  1. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis39
  2. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim32
  3. Service records negative or silent27
  4. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service27
  5. No current diagnosis21
  6. Criteria for service connection not met7
  7. Current diagnosis established6
  8. No continuity of symptomatology6

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent thyroid enlargement toxic (graves' disease or thyrotoxicosis) decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. 26005121M. Tenner · 2026

Related to in-service environmental toxin exposure; Southwest Asia theater of operations service

Citation Nr. A26033306Delyvonne M. Whitehead · 2026

Conceded herbicide exposure during service; VA examiner linked hypothyroidism to herbicide exposure; Later negative opinion relied on inadequate TERA memorandum

Citation Nr. A26029367D. Martz Ames · 2026

Hyperthyroidism diagnosed in 2003; Bilateral dry eye syndrome noted by VA examiner; Rated by analogy to DC 6025 for bilateral lacrimal apparatus disorders; Resolving doubt in Veteran's favor

Denied

Citation Nr. A26038159Marcus N. Fulton · 2026

No competent evidence of in-service event, injury, or disease; No indication of association between disability and service; Earliest documentation of thyroid disability was years after service; Veteran lacks medical training to assert link to later diagnosis

Citation Nr. A26035680Marcus N. Fulton · 2026

Criteria for entitlement not met; Evidence persuasively weighs against service connection; No nexus to in-service immunizations

Citation Nr. A26024834B.T. Knope · 2026

No current diagnosis of hyperthyroidism shown; No evidence of symptoms during or after service; No continuity of symptoms established

Rules that apply to thyroid enlargement toxic (graves' disease or thyrotoxicosis) claims

Research your thyroid enlargement toxic (graves' disease or thyrotoxicosis) case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a thyroid enlargement toxic (graves' disease or thyrotoxicosis) issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2018–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.