BVA decisions by condition

Substance use disorders: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2018 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a substance use disorders issue in 901 decisions. It granted the substance use disorders issue in 22.3% of them, above the 19.9% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 26.0%, and remanded it in 50.4%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 46.2% were granted.

Decisions

901

2018–2026

Granted

22.3%

All conditions: 19.9%

Granted on the merits

46.2%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

50.4%

Denied: 26.0%

Substance use disorders outcomes by year

YearDecisionsGrantedDeniedRemanded
2018
125
13.6%31.2%52.0%
2019
118
17.8%28.8%51.7%
2020
91
22.0%25.3%52.7%
2021
76
21.1%32.9%42.1%
2022
94
25.5%23.4%52.1%
2023
115
20.9%20.0%57.4%
2024
124
28.2%16.1%54.8%
2025
121
28.1%28.9%43.0%

Evidence in granted and denied substance use disorders decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the substance use disorders issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion21483.5%23.6%+59.9 pts
Claimed as secondary51672.0%16.7%+55.2 pts
Favorable VA exam14775.9%35.4%+40.4 pts
Private medical opinion28565.0%34.9%+30.1 pts
Treating physician opinion4272.0%44.6%+27.4 pts
Combat service8467.9%43.0%+24.8 pts
Lay statement73646.8%42.6%+4.2 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 73.1% of the decisions that granted substance use disorders.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 40.3% of grants and 10.3% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often substance use disorders was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion46541.3%52.0%−10.7 pts
Unfavorable VA exam66843.7%55.4%−11.7 pts

Why the Board granted or denied substance use disorders

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Caused by the service-connected disability41
  2. Current diagnosis established15
  3. Service connection established8
  4. Aggravated by the service-connected disability5
  5. Criteria for service connection met4
  6. Secondary to PTSD3
  7. Alcohol use disorder diagnosed3
  8. Diagnosed with alcohol use disorder2

Most common reasons in denials

  1. No current diagnosis21
  2. Caused by the service-connected disability19
  3. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim15
  4. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service14
  5. Criteria for service connection not met7
  6. Current diagnosis established7
  7. Aggravated by the service-connected disability5
  8. Not secondary to a service-connected disability5

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent substance use disorders decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26035328J. Parker · 2026

Alcohol use disorder found secondary to primary depressive disorder.; Substance abuse not considered willful misconduct when secondary to primary disability.; Evidence does not show direct service connection excluded due to willful misconduct.

Citation Nr. A26034386A. Jaeger · 2026

Private evaluation diagnosed cannabis use disorder, moderate.; Opined to have started in service and continued to present.; Proximately due to acquired psychiatric disorder.

Citation Nr. A26031228Martin B. Peters · 2026

Private opinion linked polysubstance use disorder to PTSD.; Opinion found disorder at least as likely as not incurred in service.

Denied

Citation Nr. A26038465Christopher A. Wendell · 2026

Current diagnosis conceded; Service treatment records documented mental health evaluation; VA examiner opined less likely than not related to service

Citation Nr. A26035788Ardie A. Bland · 2026

No in-service onset or nexus to service; Evidence persuasively weighs against service connection

Citation Nr. A26031672Harvey P. Roberts · 2026

Tobacco use disorder not eligible for service connection; No indication of causation/aggravation by primary service-connected disability; Weight of evidence against service connection

Rules that apply to substance use disorders claims

Research your substance use disorders case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a substance use disorders issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2018–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.