BVA decisions by condition

Peptic ulcer disease: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2018 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a peptic ulcer disease issue in 2,118 decisions. It granted the peptic ulcer disease issue in 14.2% of them, below the 19.9% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 34.6%, and remanded it in 48.8%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 29.1% were granted.

Decisions

2,118

2018–2026

Granted

14.2%

All conditions: 19.9%

Granted on the merits

29.1%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

48.8%

Denied: 34.6%

Peptic ulcer disease outcomes by year

YearDecisionsGrantedDeniedRemanded
2018
307
10.7%35.8%45.9%
2019
282
9.2%40.1%47.9%
2020
302
16.6%37.4%45.0%
2021
247
14.2%35.2%47.8%
2022
245
13.5%31.0%53.1%
2023
256
14.1%30.1%55.1%
2024
221
12.7%33.9%52.0%
2025
184
22.3%33.2%44.0%
2026
74
24.3%27.0%50.0%

Evidence in granted and denied peptic ulcer disease decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the peptic ulcer disease issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion28254.2%23.4%+30.8 pts
Favorable VA exam21953.9%23.8%+30.1 pts
Claimed as secondary36647.0%26.4%+20.6 pts
Private medical opinion57435.9%25.8%+10.1 pts
Lay statement1,68228.1%34.9%−6.8 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 69.0% of the decisions that granted peptic ulcer disease.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 36.0% of grants and 12.6% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often peptic ulcer disease was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion98925.4%33.0%−7.6 pts
Unfavorable VA exam1,45627.2%36.3%−9.1 pts

Why the Board granted or denied peptic ulcer disease

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established24
  2. Continuity of symptomatology since service9
  3. Caused by the service-connected disability6
  4. Service connection established4
  5. Evidence evenly balanced3
  6. Continuous moderate manifestations3
  7. Already at the maximum schedular rating3
  8. Symptoms more nearly approximate continuous moderate manifestations2

Most common reasons in denials

  1. No current diagnosis122
  2. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim79
  3. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service61
  4. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis47
  5. Current diagnosis established46
  6. Service records negative or silent36
  7. Criteria for service connection not met20
  8. No continuity of symptomatology16

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent peptic ulcer disease decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26040529M. Hyland · 2026

Secondary service connection theory supported by evidence; Linked to service-connected DVT; Resolving reasonable doubt in veteran's favor

Citation Nr. 26004536K. Conner · 2026

Evidence supports 20 percent rating under DC 7305; Symptoms of intermittent abdominal pain and nausea documented; Higher ratings not warranted due to lack of weight loss or severe incapacitating episodes

Citation Nr. A26029472David A. Brenningmeyer · 2026

Service connection granted for peptic ulcers; Presumptive basis due to chronicity; In-service symptoms and continuity of symptomatology

Denied

Citation Nr. 26004854David A. Brenningmeyer · 2026

Evidence did not meet criteria for compensable rating prior to Dec 21, 2023; No alkaline gastritis, recurrent ulcer, or mild circulatory symptoms prior to Dec 21, 2023; Evidence did not meet criteria for rating higher than 40% after Dec 21, 2023; No severe symptoms, anemia, weight loss, or specific postgastrectomy complications documented

Citation Nr. 26004799Jimmy L. Bardin · 2026

No in-service onset or treatment for ulcer disability; VA examiner found GERD not related to service or TERA; Obesity noted as risk factor

Citation Nr. A26030787Jonathan B. Kramer · 2026

Veteran sought increased rating for gastric ulcer.; Board previously increased rating to 20% (pre-May 19, 2024) and 40% (post-May 19, 2024).; Evidence persuasively weighed against claim for higher rating; benefit of doubt doctrine not applicable.

Rules that apply to peptic ulcer disease claims

Research your peptic ulcer disease case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a peptic ulcer disease issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2018–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.