BVA decisions by condition

Neoplasms malignant any specified part of respiratory system: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2017 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a neoplasms malignant any specified part of respiratory system issue in 1,225 decisions. It granted the neoplasms malignant any specified part of respiratory system issue in 21.1% of them, close to the 19.4% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 30.2%, and remanded it in 47.4%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 41.2% were granted.

Decisions

1,225

2017–2026

Granted

21.1%

All conditions: 19.4%

Granted on the merits

41.2%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

47.4%

Denied: 30.2%

Neoplasms malignant any specified part of respiratory system outcomes by year

YearDecisionsGrantedDeniedRemanded
2017
68
13.2%33.8%48.5%
2018
127
20.5%38.6%39.4%
2019
158
19.6%33.5%45.6%
2020
151
21.2%35.8%40.4%
2021
131
19.1%25.2%53.4%
2022
138
14.5%29.0%55.8%
2023
153
21.6%28.1%51.0%
2024
119
22.7%24.4%51.3%
2025
128
28.1%26.6%46.1%
2026
52
38.5%23.1%38.5%

Evidence in granted and denied neoplasms malignant any specified part of respiratory system decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the neoplasms malignant any specified part of respiratory system issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion19272.3%31.6%+40.7 pts
Combat service5572.4%39.7%+32.7 pts
Favorable VA exam8268.6%37.7%+30.8 pts
Treating physician opinion8967.9%38.6%+29.3 pts
Claimed as secondary23057.6%38.4%+19.2 pts
Private medical opinion46249.5%34.3%+15.2 pts
Lay statement89134.7%64.0%−29.3 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 70.7% of the decisions that granted neoplasms malignant any specified part of respiratory system.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 24.3% of grants and 10.5% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often neoplasms malignant any specified part of respiratory system was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion57132.6%49.7%−17.1 pts
Unfavorable VA exam73535.0%52.5%−17.5 pts

Why the Board granted or denied neoplasms malignant any specified part of respiratory system

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established36
  2. Caused by the service-connected disability15
  3. Veteran served in thailand during vietnam era4
  4. Pact act presumptive service connection for respiratory cancer4
  5. Lung cancer is a presumptive condition under 38 c.f.r. § 3.309(e)3
  6. Presumption of herbicide exposure applies3
  7. Service connection established3
  8. Diagnosis of lung cancer3

Most common reasons in denials

  1. No current diagnosis45
  2. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim41
  3. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis39
  4. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service35
  5. Service records negative or silent31
  6. Current diagnosis established12
  7. No continuity of symptomatology8
  8. Evidence persuasively weighs against service connection6

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent neoplasms malignant any specified part of respiratory system decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26039545William H. Donnelly · 2026

Pulmonary coin lesion evaluated under DC 6820 by analogy to Restrictive Lung Disease; FEV-1/FVC of 83 percent predicted meets criteria for 10 percent evaluation; Higher rating not warranted as FEV-1/FVC does not meet criteria for 30 percent evaluation

Citation Nr. A26037706A. S. Caracciolo · 2026

Competent and probative VA TERA Medical Opinion DBQ; Conceded in-service TERA exposure; Approximate equipoise of evidence; Benefit of the doubt applied

Citation Nr. A26037307Eric S. Leboff · 2026

Evidence in equipoise; Positive VA medical oncologist opinion; TERA memorandums reflect exposure; Benefit of the doubt applied

Denied

Citation Nr. A26036118D. Johnson · 2026

No current diagnosis of lung lesions/spots; Service treatment records negative for lung issues; Evidence weighed against the claim; Benefit of the doubt doctrine did not apply

Citation Nr. A26034038Michael Martin · 2026

No current diagnosis of lung cancer established.; Medical evidence showed pulmonary aspergillosis, not malignancy.; Pulmonary aspergillosis is not a presumptive condition for herbicide exposure.

Citation Nr. A26033766Michael A. Pappas · 2026

No current diagnosis for lung nodule; No proof of present disability; VA examiner provided negative nexus opinion

Rules that apply to neoplasms malignant any specified part of respiratory system claims

Research your neoplasms malignant any specified part of respiratory system case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a neoplasms malignant any specified part of respiratory system issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2017–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.