BVA decisions by condition

Nasal septum deviation: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2018 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a nasal septum deviation issue in 1,068 decisions. It granted the nasal septum deviation issue in 17.7% of them, below the 19.9% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 33.0%, and remanded it in 46.7%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 34.9% were granted.

Decisions

1,068

2018–2026

Granted

17.7%

All conditions: 19.9%

Granted on the merits

34.9%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

46.7%

Denied: 33.0%

Nasal septum deviation outcomes by year

YearDecisionsGrantedDeniedRemanded
2018
111
10.8%43.2%41.4%
2019
135
14.8%23.7%58.5%
2020
126
15.9%36.5%46.0%
2021
119
11.8%26.9%58.8%
2022
110
14.5%34.5%49.1%
2023
138
20.3%33.3%41.3%
2024
139
26.6%30.2%43.2%
2025
139
21.6%38.8%37.4%
2026
51
23.5%27.5%45.1%

Evidence in granted and denied nasal septum deviation decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the nasal septum deviation issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion19563.6%25.7%+38.0 pts
Favorable VA exam15860.2%28.6%+31.5 pts
Private medical opinion31149.7%28.1%+21.6 pts
Combat service6454.8%33.7%+21.1 pts
Buddy statement5851.5%33.9%+17.7 pts
Lay statement85137.5%23.8%+13.7 pts
Claimed as secondary6336.4%34.9%+1.5 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 74.6% of the decisions that granted nasal septum deviation.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 42.9% of grants and 13.4% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often nasal septum deviation was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion51135.0%34.9%+0.1 pts
Unfavorable VA exam75032.4%43.1%−10.7 pts

Why the Board granted or denied nasal septum deviation

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established29
  2. Presumption of soundness not rebutted7
  3. Criteria for service connection met3
  4. Service connection granted3
  5. Positive nexus opinion from VA examiner3
  6. Positive VA medical opinion linking condition to service2
  7. Presumption of soundness applies2
  8. Diagnosed during service2

Most common reasons in denials

  1. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim33
  2. No current diagnosis31
  3. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis30
  4. Service records negative or silent26
  5. Current diagnosis established22
  6. Already at the maximum schedular rating21
  7. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service14
  8. Criteria for compensable rating not met11

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent nasal septum deviation decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26040136Michael Martin · 2026

Benefit of the doubt applied; Lay statements found credible and probative; Evidence in approximate balance

Citation Nr. A26040120Jonathan B. Kramer · 2026

Condition manifested during service; VA examiner opinion is probative and favorable; No contrary competent medical opinions

Citation Nr. A26029455Michael J. Skaltsounis · 2026

Private examination confirmed traumatic deviated septum with right-sided obstruction.; CT scan showed deviated septum with spur and defect.; Veteran's testimony described complete obstruction of right nasal passage.

Denied

Citation Nr. A26032105Jonathan Hager · 2026

No in-service trauma found.; Post-service diagnosis of non-traumatic deviated septum.; Rating would constitute impermissible pyramiding with existing sinusitis and allergic rhinitis.

Citation Nr. A26026606Neely M. Peden · 2026

Criteria for rating in excess of 10 percent not met; No evidence of polyps or greater than 50% nasal obstruction

Citation Nr. A26026035G. A. Wasik · 2026

Evidence weighs against incurrence/relation to service; No in-service event, injury, or illness linked

Rules that apply to nasal septum deviation claims

Research your nasal septum deviation case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a nasal septum deviation issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2018–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.