BVA decisions by condition

Lumbosacral strain: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2018 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a lumbosacral strain issue in 3,417 decisions. It granted the lumbosacral strain issue in 28.5% of them, above the 19.9% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 35.6%, and remanded it in 35.4%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 44.4% were granted.

Decisions

3,417

2018–2026

Granted

28.5%

All conditions: 19.9%

Granted on the merits

44.4%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

35.4%

Denied: 35.6%

Lumbosacral strain outcomes by year

YearDecisionsGrantedDeniedRemanded
2018
101
22.8%43.6%29.7%
2019
229
21.4%42.8%38.0%
2020
314
24.2%43.6%32.2%
2021
357
24.4%44.5%30.8%
2022
316
25.6%37.0%36.1%
2023
367
29.4%33.8%37.3%
2024
574
31.4%34.3%35.2%
2025
853
29.8%30.6%38.0%
2026
306
37.6%26.5%34.3%

Evidence in granted and denied lumbosacral strain decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the lumbosacral strain issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion68175.5%33.9%+41.5 pts
Favorable VA exam55363.0%39.6%+23.4 pts
Buddy statement12565.2%43.5%+21.6 pts
Private medical opinion1,03957.0%37.5%+19.4 pts
Treating physician opinion15257.9%43.7%+14.2 pts
Combat service20657.0%43.6%+13.5 pts
Claimed as secondary24656.9%43.6%+13.3 pts
Lay statement3,03043.8%51.1%−7.3 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 72.8% of the decisions that granted lumbosacral strain.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 46.2% of grants and 13.8% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often lumbosacral strain was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion1,98847.1%40.7%+6.4 pts
Unfavorable VA exam2,99142.4%63.3%−20.8 pts

Why the Board granted or denied lumbosacral strain

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established162
  2. Continuity of symptomatology since service19
  3. Caused by the service-connected disability18
  4. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service7
  5. Evidence evenly balanced6
  6. Criteria for service connection met6
  7. In-service injury documented6
  8. Aggravated by the service-connected disability5

Most common reasons in denials

  1. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service140
  2. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim115
  3. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis62
  4. Service records negative or silent49
  5. Current diagnosis established47
  6. No current diagnosis15
  7. No continuity of symptomatology14
  8. Forward flexion not limited to 30 degrees or less14

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent lumbosacral strain decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26040659Tiffany Dawson · 2026

Favorable finding of current disability by AOJ; Lay statements of onset in service corroborated by STRs; VA examiner's opinion against service connection was inadequately reasoned; Benefit of the doubt resolved in Veteran's favor

Citation Nr. A26040078Shaun S. Speranza · 2026

Service treatment records show in-service complaints of low back pain.; VA examinations were inadequate for failing to address pertinent evidence and provide adequate rationale.; Private medical specialist provided positive nexus opinion linking condition to service.; Veteran and service member lay statements are credible and probative.

Citation Nr. A26040034J. Parker · 2026

Evidence of onset of back pain in service in 2005; Chronicity of symptoms noted in service treatment records; Favorable post-service treatment records indicating onset five years prior; Inaccurate VA examination due to failure to consider all evidence

Denied

Citation Nr. A26040031B. D. Watson · 2026

March 2025 VA exam showed flexion limited to 80 degrees, combined ROM to 215 degrees.; Examiner noted localized tenderness but no abnormal gait or spinal contour.; Board found evidence did not meet criteria for >10% rating.

Citation Nr. A26038756B.T. Knope · 2026

Inconsistent lay statements regarding symptoms; Lack of contemporaneous service treatment record findings; VA examiner opined less likely than not related to service

Citation Nr. 26004894Thomas L. English · 2026

Current diagnosis confirmed by VA examinations.; STRs silent for low back complaints; denied recurrence.; Negative nexus opinions from VA examiners citing lack of chronicity and post-service etiology.; Board afforded low probative value to some opinions for failing to consider lay statements.

Rules that apply to lumbosacral strain claims

Research your lumbosacral strain case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a lumbosacral strain issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2018–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.