BVA decisions by condition

Diverticulitis: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2018 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a diverticulitis issue in 1,027 decisions. It granted the diverticulitis issue in 11.9% of them, below the 19.9% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 29.0%, and remanded it in 58.1%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 29.0% were granted.

Decisions

1,027

2018–2026

Granted

11.9%

All conditions: 19.9%

Granted on the merits

29.0%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

58.1%

Denied: 29.0%

Diverticulitis outcomes by year

YearDecisionsGrantedDeniedRemanded
2018
114
6.1%37.7%56.1%
2019
118
11.0%35.6%50.8%
2020
127
8.7%34.6%55.9%
2021
109
9.2%26.6%62.4%
2022
114
13.2%23.7%62.3%
2023
111
14.4%18.9%65.8%
2024
139
14.4%23.7%60.4%
2025
141
12.1%31.2%56.7%
2026
54
24.1%27.8%48.1%

Evidence in granted and denied diverticulitis decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the diverticulitis issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion18356.1%20.8%+35.3 pts
Treating physician opinion4154.2%27.5%+26.6 pts
Claimed as secondary25345.4%23.4%+22.0 pts
Private medical opinion31340.6%21.9%+18.7 pts
Favorable VA exam14642.3%26.0%+16.3 pts
Combat service4734.6%28.7%+5.9 pts
Lay statement81528.7%31.0%−2.3 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 67.2% of the decisions that granted diverticulitis.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 34.4% of grants and 11.1% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often diverticulitis was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Unfavorable VA exam76728.5%31.3%−2.7 pts
Negative nexus opinion60527.2%32.8%−5.6 pts

Why the Board granted or denied diverticulitis

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established21
  2. Caused by the service-connected disability8
  3. Service connection established6
  4. Aggravated by the service-connected disability3
  5. Criteria for secondary service connection met2
  6. Continuity of symptoms from service to present2
  7. Post-service diagnosis of diverticulitis2
  8. Evidence evenly balanced2

Most common reasons in denials

  1. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis48
  2. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service45
  3. Service records negative or silent37
  4. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim35
  5. No current diagnosis20
  6. Current diagnosis established15
  7. Criteria for service connection not met4
  8. Aggravated by the service-connected disability4

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent diverticulitis decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26035983Frederic P. Gallun · 2026

Conceded exposure to mustard gas at Edgewood Arsenal.; VA examiner concluded diverticular disease was due to mustard gas exposure.; Service connection granted as criteria are met.

Citation Nr. 26004374Ryan T. Kessel · 2026

Secondary to panic disorder; Proximately caused by medication; Obesity as intermediate step; Benefit of doubt applied

Citation Nr. A26032207Frederic P. Gallun · 2026

Treating physician opinion found diverticulitis at least as likely as not caused by IBS; VA examiner opinion was unclear and contradicted by treating physician; Evidence found in equipoise, applying benefit of doubt

Denied

Citation Nr. A26039966Steven D. Reiss · 2026

Diagnosis occurred over 30 years post-service.; No in-service complaints or evidence of diverticular disease.; VA opinions found less likely than not related to service/exposure.; Evidence persuasively weighs against the claim.

Citation Nr. A26031607A. P. Simpson · 2026

No in-service complaints, symptoms, evaluation, diagnosis, or treatment for diverticulitis.; Diagnosis occurred many years after service discharge.; VA medical opinions found no nexus to service-connected irritable bowel syndrome.

Citation Nr. A26027730Thomas H. O'Shay · 2026

No in-service onset or continuity of symptoms.; No nexus opinion linking diverticulitis to service.; Condition diagnosed post-service.

Rules that apply to diverticulitis claims

Research your diverticulitis case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a diverticulitis issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2018–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.