BVA decisions by condition

Depressive disorder: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2018 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a depressive disorder issue in 3,270 decisions. It granted the depressive disorder issue in 20.6% of them, close to the 19.9% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 24.7%, and remanded it in 52.2%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 45.4% were granted.

Decisions

3,270

2018–2026

Granted

20.6%

All conditions: 19.9%

Granted on the merits

45.4%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

52.2%

Denied: 24.7%

Depressive disorder outcomes by year

YearDecisionsGrantedDeniedRemanded
2018
216
17.1%17.6%61.6%
2019
396
21.2%18.9%55.3%
2020
467
15.0%27.8%54.8%
2021
366
22.1%24.6%52.2%
2022
378
14.6%21.7%61.9%
2023
402
19.2%21.6%54.2%
2024
414
24.2%26.1%47.6%
2025
502
25.9%32.1%41.0%
2026
129
31.0%29.5%40.3%

Evidence in granted and denied depressive disorder decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the depressive disorder issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion58176.5%35.8%+40.7 pts
Claimed as secondary1,06572.5%36.8%+35.7 pts
Favorable VA exam40170.7%39.8%+30.9 pts
Combat service16662.9%44.6%+18.3 pts
Private medical opinion1,13453.2%39.7%+13.6 pts
Treating physician opinion21250.4%45.0%+5.4 pts
Lay statement2,66643.5%57.4%−13.8 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 66.0% of the decisions that granted depressive disorder.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 30.4% of grants and 9.1% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often depressive disorder was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion1,39445.7%45.3%+0.4 pts
Unfavorable VA exam2,36343.3%54.4%−11.1 pts

Why the Board granted or denied depressive disorder

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Caused by the service-connected disability66
  2. Current diagnosis established64
  3. Service connection established20
  4. Aggravated by the service-connected disability19
  5. Criteria for service connection met18
  6. Deficiencies in most areas of occupational and social impairment6
  7. Occupational and social impairment with deficiencies in most areas6
  8. Symptoms approximated 70% rating criteria5

Most common reasons in denials

  1. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim72
  2. No current diagnosis37
  3. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis35
  4. Service records negative or silent28
  5. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service24
  6. Current diagnosis established14
  7. Symptoms did not meet criteria for 70% rating14
  8. Criteria for service connection not met8

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent depressive disorder decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26040748Nathaniel Doan · 2026

Credible and corroborated MST report; MST occurred in line of duty during inactive duty for training; Etiologically related to PTSD and depression

Citation Nr. A26040903Kristy L. Zadora · 2026

Reduction in rating from 100% to 30% was improper.; VA failed to demonstrate sustained improvement.; VA failed to address ability to function under ordinary conditions.; Rating reduction void ab initio.

Citation Nr. A26039237A. Jaeger · 2026

Resolving all reasonable doubt in favor of the Veteran; Symptomatology consistent with 70 percent rating criteria; Deficiencies in most areas of occupational and social impairment

Denied

Citation Nr. A26039288William H. Donnelly · 2026

Service treatment records negative for mental health treatment.; VA examiner noted mild or transient symptoms, decreasing work efficiency only during significant stress.; Veteran reported significant mental health impacts but also full-time employment.; Board found veteran's statements regarding symptom severity not credible.; Private DBQ findings contradicted veteran's statements and VA exam.; Board afforded greater probative weight to VA examiner's opinion.; Evidence persuasively against claim; benefit of doubt doctrine not applicable.

Citation Nr. A26038755R. Casadei · 2026

Retains some social functioning and cognitive abilities; Does not meet criteria for total occupational impairment; Symptoms inconsistent with gross impairment or total isolation

Citation Nr. A26036678K. Conner · 2026

Veteran's sustained employment at USPS weighs against total impairment.; Private opinion lacked rationale and review of relevant evidence.; Veteran's social functioning, including relationships and activities, weighs against total impairment.

Rules that apply to depressive disorder claims

Research your depressive disorder case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a depressive disorder issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2018–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.