BVA decisions by condition

Asthma: BVA grant rates and what wins

From 2018 to 2026, the Board of Veterans' Appeals decided a asthma issue in 2,126 decisions. It granted the asthma issue in 27.8% of them, above the 19.9% grant rate for all conditions, denied it in 23.0%, and remanded it in 48.7%. Counting only decisions on the merits (granted or denied), 54.7% were granted.

Decisions

2,126

2018–2026

Granted

27.8%

All conditions: 19.9%

Granted on the merits

54.7%

Granted ÷ (granted + denied)

Remanded

48.7%

Denied: 23.0%

Asthma outcomes by year

YearDecisionsGrantedDeniedRemanded
2018
112
13.4%21.4%60.7%
2019
161
8.1%28.6%60.2%
2020
214
17.8%29.0%55.1%
2021
225
20.9%19.6%58.2%
2022
279
32.6%18.3%47.7%
2023
285
28.1%22.8%48.8%
2024
319
40.4%19.4%40.4%
2025
400
31.3%27.5%41.3%
2026
131
40.5%19.1%42.7%

Evidence in granted and denied asthma decisions

For each kind of supporting evidence: how often the Board granted the asthma issue on the merits when the decision mentioned it, compared with decisions that did not. These are associations, not causes, and evidence is recorded per decision, not per issue.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Positive nexus opinion37478.5%49.5%+29.0 pts
Favorable VA exam34276.1%49.7%+26.4 pts
Combat service14975.3%53.2%+22.1 pts
Treating physician opinion16471.7%52.9%+18.8 pts
Private medical opinion65261.0%52.0%+8.9 pts
Claimed as secondary14847.9%55.0%−7.1 pts
Lay statement1,70250.7%70.3%−19.6 pts
  • The Board applied the benefit-of-the-doubt rule (38 CFR 3.102) in 57.5% of the decisions that granted asthma.
  • The Board found the veteran's statements credible in 26.7% of grants and 13.3% of denials.

Negative evidence in the record

An unfavorable exam or a negative nexus opinion often sits in the same record as favorable evidence, and the Board weighs them against each other. So these rows show how often asthma was still granted when the record contained the negative item, not that the item helped.

In the recordDecisionsGranted when presentWhen absentDifference
Negative nexus opinion1,08652.7%56.6%−3.9 pts
Unfavorable VA exam1,63451.1%72.0%−20.9 pts

Why the Board granted or denied asthma

Most common reasons in grants

  1. Current diagnosis established85
  2. Presumptive service connection under 38 c.f.r. § 3.32022
  3. Veteran served in southwest asia during persian gulf war17
  4. Pact act presumptive service connection for asthma11
  5. Qualifying service in southwest asia theater of operations10
  6. Service in southwest asia theater of operations10
  7. Presumed exposure to fine particulate matter9
  8. Veteran served in southwest asia theater of operations during persian gulf war9

Most common reasons in denials

  1. Service records negative or silent37
  2. VA examiner: less likely than not related to service34
  3. Preponderance of the evidence against the claim33
  4. No in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis31
  5. No current diagnosis16
  6. Current diagnosis established7
  7. Pulmonary function tests did not meet criteria for higher rating7
  8. Clear and unmistakable evidence of pre-existing asthma6

Numbers are decisions that gave the reason. Reasons are short phrases extracted by AI from each decision; common wordings of the same reason are grouped. Benefit of the doubt is reported above.

Recent asthma decisions

Granted

Citation Nr. A26039869John R. Doolittle, II · 2026

Asthma rated under DC 6602; Requires intermittent inhalational use; Does not require daily therapy or anti-inflammatory medication; Pulmonary function tests do not meet criteria for higher rating

Citation Nr. A26040093H. Seesel · 2026

Aggravated by service; Presumptive under 38 C.F.R. § 3.320; Benefit of the doubt applied

Citation Nr. 26004986Nathaniel Doan · 2026

March 2024 VA DBQ with positive nexus opinion; August 2025 non-VA medical opinion relating asthma to in-service TERA; Benefit of the doubt doctrine applied due to approximately balanced evidence

Denied

Citation Nr. A26040906Eric S. Leboff · 2026

Pulmonary function tests (FEV-1 85% predicted, FEV-1/FVC 78% predicted) did not meet criteria for higher rating.; Asthma evaluated at 10% under DC 6602.; No evidence of daily bronchodilator or anti-inflammatory medication use, or frequent corticosteroid bursts.

Citation Nr. A26038966S. Charles Neill · 2026

Did not meet criteria for higher rating (60% or more); No monthly physician visits for exacerbations; No systemic corticosteroid use; PFT results did not meet threshold

Citation Nr. A26038181Jenna Brant · 2026

Clear and unmistakable evidence of pre-existing asthma; No evidence of in-service aggravation; Conflicting statements diminished credibility regarding asthma treatment

Rules that apply to asthma claims

Research your asthma case

Narrow by year, judge, evidence or secondary condition, read the decisions, and export a research memo.

Open VA Law Explorer

How these numbers are calculated

  • Rates count decisions in which the Board decided a asthma issue, by the outcome of that issue. Other issues in the same decision can have different outcomes.
  • “Granted on the merits” leaves out remands and dismissals. “All conditions” is the grant share across every condition issue in the data.
  • The data comes from CaseScribe's AI extraction of public BVA decisions (2018–2026) and can contain errors. It is updated automatically as new decisions are added.