{"page":"https://casescribe.ai/explorer/conditions/uterus-removal","generated_at":"2026-10-03T18:34:00.823Z","data_as_of":{"decisions":944125,"first_year":2017,"last_year":2026,"latest_decision":"2026-04-30","cfr":"2026-10-01","m21":"2026-09-29"},"about":{"publisher":"CaseScribe AI (VA Law Explorer)","source":"Public Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions (appeals of VA decisions, not VA's first decisions), M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual, 38 CFR Parts 3 and 4.","method":"Outcomes are issue-level: each condition the Board decided in a decision counts once. Decision data is extracted by AI and can contain errors. Rates describe past appeals and do not predict any claim.","disclaimer":"For research only. CaseScribe AI is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Verify figures against the source decisions and regulations.","attribution":"Cite as: VA Law Explorer, CaseScribe AI, with the page URL."},"data":{"condition":"Uterus removal","all_conditions_granted_pct":19.4,"decisions":597,"years":"2017-2026","granted_pct":17.3,"denied_pct":30,"remanded_pct":51.1,"granted_on_merits_pct":36.5,"by_year":[{"year":2017,"issues":36,"granted_pct":8.3,"denied_pct":44.4,"remanded_pct":38.9},{"year":2018,"issues":69,"granted_pct":8.7,"denied_pct":33.3,"remanded_pct":53.6},{"year":2019,"issues":74,"granted_pct":16.2,"denied_pct":32.4,"remanded_pct":50},{"year":2020,"issues":58,"granted_pct":17.2,"denied_pct":37.9,"remanded_pct":39.7},{"year":2021,"issues":54,"granted_pct":11.1,"denied_pct":38.9,"remanded_pct":50},{"year":2022,"issues":55,"granted_pct":14.5,"denied_pct":16.4,"remanded_pct":63.6},{"year":2023,"issues":73,"granted_pct":16.4,"denied_pct":27.4,"remanded_pct":56.2},{"year":2024,"issues":86,"granted_pct":19.8,"denied_pct":22.1,"remanded_pct":58.1},{"year":2025,"issues":76,"granted_pct":25,"denied_pct":25,"remanded_pct":48.7},{"year":2026,"issues":24,"granted_pct":45.8,"denied_pct":25,"remanded_pct":29.2}],"benefit_of_doubt_in_grants_pct":62.1,"evidence_on_merits":[{"evidence":"va_exam_favorable","decisions_with":84,"granted_pct_with":52.5,"granted_pct_without":32.1},{"evidence":"va_exam_unfavorable","decisions_with":424,"granted_pct_with":32.6,"granted_pct_without":50.8},{"evidence":"nexus_positive","decisions_with":100,"granted_pct_with":66.2,"granted_pct_without":27.6},{"evidence":"nexus_negative","decisions_with":301,"granted_pct_with":36,"granted_pct_without":37.1},{"evidence":"private_opinion","decisions_with":199,"granted_pct_with":54.5,"granted_pct_without":26.8},{"evidence":"lay_statement","decisions_with":482,"granted_pct_with":37,"granted_pct_without":34}],"top_reasons":{"granted":[{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":12},{"reason":"caused by the service-connected disability","decisions":9},{"reason":"service connection established","decisions":5},{"reason":"met criteria for 50 percent rating under dc 7617","decisions":2},{"reason":"no contrary opinion of record","decisions":2},{"reason":"hysterectomy performed for endometriosis","decisions":2}],"denied":[{"reason":"already at the maximum schedular rating","decisions":29},{"reason":"preponderance of the evidence against the claim","decisions":19},{"reason":"va examiner: less likely than not related to service","decisions":13},{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":7},{"reason":"service records negative or silent","decisions":7},{"reason":"no current diagnosis","decisions":5}]},"recent_examples":{"granted":[{"case_id":"A26038006","year":2026,"judge":"MICHAEL MARTIN","rationale":"New and relevant evidence received; Partial hysterectomy caused by service-connected fibroids; Probative private medical opinion"},{"case_id":"26003654","year":2026,"judge":"LESLEY A. REIN","rationale":"Resolving reasonable doubt in Veteran's favor; Hysterectomy related to in-service pain and heavy bleeding; Nexus established by VA examiner's opinion"},{"case_id":"A26021022","year":2026,"judge":"D. MARTZ AMES","rationale":"Met criteria for 50 percent rating under DC 7617.; Effective date of September 16, 2024, granted.; 100 percent criteria not met due to expired 3-month period."}],"denied":[{"case_id":"A26039656","year":2026,"judge":"AMANDA G. ALDERMAN","rationale":"Evidence persuasively weighs against service connection; No indication of in-service onset, relation, or aggravation"},{"case_id":"A26034424","year":2026,"judge":"ANN K. MINAMI","rationale":"Veteran seeking increased rating for hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy.; Currently rated 50% under DC 7617.; DC 7617 allows 100% for 3 months post-surgery, then 50%.; Claim filed after the 3-month period, so 50% is maximum."},{"case_id":"A26019120","year":2026,"judge":"S. CHARLES NEILL","rationale":"Veteran already receiving maximum schedular rating (50%).; No evidence supports higher or extraschedular rating.; Evidence persuasively against rating in excess of 50%."}]},"how_va_rates":null,"rules":[]}}