{"page":"https://casescribe.ai/explorer/conditions/uterus-disease","generated_at":"2026-10-03T18:34:09.082Z","data_as_of":{"decisions":944125,"first_year":2017,"last_year":2026,"latest_decision":"2026-04-30","cfr":"2026-10-01","m21":"2026-09-29"},"about":{"publisher":"CaseScribe AI (VA Law Explorer)","source":"Public Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions (appeals of VA decisions, not VA's first decisions), M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual, 38 CFR Parts 3 and 4.","method":"Outcomes are issue-level: each condition the Board decided in a decision counts once. Decision data is extracted by AI and can contain errors. Rates describe past appeals and do not predict any claim.","disclaimer":"For research only. CaseScribe AI is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Verify figures against the source decisions and regulations.","attribution":"Cite as: VA Law Explorer, CaseScribe AI, with the page URL."},"data":{"condition":"Uterus disease","all_conditions_granted_pct":19.4,"decisions":1179,"years":"2017-2026","granted_pct":18.7,"denied_pct":26.3,"remanded_pct":53.4,"granted_on_merits_pct":41.6,"by_year":[{"year":2017,"issues":81,"granted_pct":14.8,"denied_pct":38.3,"remanded_pct":39.5},{"year":2018,"issues":165,"granted_pct":16.4,"denied_pct":25.5,"remanded_pct":52.1},{"year":2019,"issues":131,"granted_pct":16,"denied_pct":26,"remanded_pct":53.4},{"year":2020,"issues":137,"granted_pct":12.4,"denied_pct":33.6,"remanded_pct":51.8},{"year":2021,"issues":123,"granted_pct":13,"denied_pct":31.7,"remanded_pct":54.5},{"year":2022,"issues":114,"granted_pct":21.1,"denied_pct":24.6,"remanded_pct":53.5},{"year":2023,"issues":142,"granted_pct":19,"denied_pct":19,"remanded_pct":59.2},{"year":2024,"issues":154,"granted_pct":22.1,"denied_pct":19.5,"remanded_pct":55.8},{"year":2025,"issues":148,"granted_pct":22.3,"denied_pct":27,"remanded_pct":49.3},{"year":2026,"issues":48,"granted_pct":31.3,"denied_pct":16.7,"remanded_pct":52.1}],"benefit_of_doubt_in_grants_pct":70.6,"evidence_on_merits":[{"evidence":"va_exam_favorable","decisions_with":131,"granted_pct_with":72,"granted_pct_without":35.2},{"evidence":"va_exam_unfavorable","decisions_with":829,"granted_pct_with":37.7,"granted_pct_without":56.3},{"evidence":"nexus_positive","decisions_with":158,"granted_pct_with":76.6,"granted_pct_without":32.4},{"evidence":"nexus_negative","decisions_with":597,"granted_pct_with":37.5,"granted_pct_without":46.6},{"evidence":"private_opinion","decisions_with":313,"granted_pct_with":56,"granted_pct_without":34},{"evidence":"treating_physician","decisions_with":66,"granted_pct_with":71.8,"granted_pct_without":39.2},{"evidence":"lay_statement","decisions_with":950,"granted_pct_with":41.2,"granted_pct_without":44.3}],"top_reasons":{"granted":[{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":39},{"reason":"symptoms not controlled by continuous treatment","decisions":8},{"reason":"criteria for service connection met","decisions":6},{"reason":"already at the maximum schedular rating","decisions":4},{"reason":"caused by the service-connected disability","decisions":4},{"reason":"symptoms require continuous treatment","decisions":3}],"denied":[{"reason":"preponderance of the evidence against the claim","decisions":45},{"reason":"va examiner: less likely than not related to service","decisions":24},{"reason":"no current diagnosis","decisions":21},{"reason":"no in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis","decisions":16},{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":13},{"reason":"service records negative or silent","decisions":10}]},"recent_examples":{"granted":[{"case_id":"26004669","year":2026,"judge":"THOMAS L. ENGLISH","rationale":"Resolving all reasonable doubt in the Veteran's favor; At least as likely as not (approximate balance of evidence); Continuity of symptoms since active service; Supported by post-service treatment records and lay evidence"},{"case_id":"A26026074","year":2026,"judge":"VICTORIA MOSHIASHWILI","rationale":"Probative evidence in favor of finding; Symptoms began in service and continued; Established causal link (nexus)"},{"case_id":"26003654","year":2026,"judge":"LESLEY A. REIN","rationale":"Resolving reasonable doubt in Veteran's favor; Uterine fibroids related to in-service pain and heavy bleeding; Nexus established by VA examiner's opinion"}],"denied":[{"case_id":"A26040178","year":2026,"judge":"ERIC S. LEBOFF","rationale":"Existing 10% rating for symptoms requiring continuous treatment is appropriate.; Evidence does not reflect symptoms not controlled by continuous treatment.; No basis for rating in excess of 10%."},{"case_id":"A26036902","year":2026,"judge":"M. M. CELLI","rationale":"No current diagnosis or functional impairment found.; No in-service event or continuity of symptomatology.; Lay statements not competent to address medical matters."},{"case_id":"A26029229","year":2026,"judge":"FREDERIC P. GALLUN","rationale":"No in-service fibroid issues in STRs; VA exams found fibroids less likely than not due to service; No nexus to conceded toxic exposures"}]},"how_va_rates":null,"rules":[]}}