{"page":"https://casescribe.ai/explorer/conditions/urinary-incontinence","generated_at":"2026-10-03T18:33:46.472Z","data_as_of":{"decisions":944125,"first_year":2017,"last_year":2026,"latest_decision":"2026-04-30","cfr":"2026-10-01","m21":"2026-09-29"},"about":{"publisher":"CaseScribe AI (VA Law Explorer)","source":"Public Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions (appeals of VA decisions, not VA's first decisions), M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual, 38 CFR Parts 3 and 4.","method":"Outcomes are issue-level: each condition the Board decided in a decision counts once. Decision data is extracted by AI and can contain errors. Rates describe past appeals and do not predict any claim.","disclaimer":"For research only. CaseScribe AI is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Verify figures against the source decisions and regulations.","attribution":"Cite as: VA Law Explorer, CaseScribe AI, with the page URL."},"data":{"condition":"Urinary incontinence","all_conditions_granted_pct":19.4,"decisions":2866,"years":"2017-2026","granted_pct":20.4,"denied_pct":30.7,"remanded_pct":47.5,"granted_on_merits_pct":40,"by_year":[{"year":2017,"issues":245,"granted_pct":11.8,"denied_pct":38,"remanded_pct":46.9},{"year":2018,"issues":425,"granted_pct":19.1,"denied_pct":37.2,"remanded_pct":41.2},{"year":2019,"issues":358,"granted_pct":17.9,"denied_pct":32.4,"remanded_pct":47.5},{"year":2020,"issues":272,"granted_pct":17.3,"denied_pct":29,"remanded_pct":52.6},{"year":2021,"issues":245,"granted_pct":18.8,"denied_pct":30.2,"remanded_pct":49.8},{"year":2022,"issues":256,"granted_pct":21.5,"denied_pct":30.9,"remanded_pct":46.5},{"year":2023,"issues":308,"granted_pct":20.5,"denied_pct":26.9,"remanded_pct":50.6},{"year":2024,"issues":332,"granted_pct":26.2,"denied_pct":22.3,"remanded_pct":49.1},{"year":2025,"issues":368,"granted_pct":26.6,"denied_pct":28.8,"remanded_pct":42.9},{"year":2026,"issues":139,"granted_pct":19.4,"denied_pct":27.3,"remanded_pct":50.4}],"benefit_of_doubt_in_grants_pct":72.8,"evidence_on_merits":[{"evidence":"va_exam_favorable","decisions_with":400,"granted_pct_with":67.3,"granted_pct_without":33},{"evidence":"va_exam_unfavorable","decisions_with":1988,"granted_pct_with":37.1,"granted_pct_without":48.1},{"evidence":"nexus_positive","decisions_with":470,"granted_pct_with":74.1,"granted_pct_without":29.6},{"evidence":"nexus_negative","decisions_with":1408,"granted_pct_with":35.5,"granted_pct_without":45.1},{"evidence":"private_opinion","decisions_with":796,"granted_pct_with":51.5,"granted_pct_without":34.2},{"evidence":"treating_physician","decisions_with":185,"granted_pct_with":66.9,"granted_pct_without":37.6},{"evidence":"lay_statement","decisions_with":2232,"granted_pct_with":38,"granted_pct_without":49.2},{"evidence":"buddy_statement","decisions_with":53,"granted_pct_with":58.1,"granted_pct_without":39.6},{"evidence":"combat_service","decisions_with":115,"granted_pct_with":53.6,"granted_pct_without":39.3}],"top_reasons":{"granted":[{"reason":"caused by the service-connected disability","decisions":72},{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":63},{"reason":"service connection established","decisions":37},{"reason":"prostate cancer is service-connected","decisions":7},{"reason":"va examiner: less likely than not related to service","decisions":5},{"reason":"aggravated by the service-connected disability","decisions":5}],"denied":[{"reason":"no current diagnosis","decisions":98},{"reason":"preponderance of the evidence against the claim","decisions":87},{"reason":"va examiner: less likely than not related to service","decisions":83},{"reason":"no in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis","decisions":75},{"reason":"service records negative or silent","decisions":60},{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":40}]},"recent_examples":{"granted":[{"case_id":"A26039814","year":2026,"judge":"STEVEN D. REISS","rationale":"Competent and credible lay and medical evidence; Private medical opinion supports nexus; Resolving doubt in Veteran's favor"},{"case_id":"A26036709","year":2026,"judge":"JIMMY L. BARDIN","rationale":"Favorable private medical opinion finding nexus; No contradictory opinions; Benefit of the doubt afforded"},{"case_id":"A26037161","year":2026,"judge":"B. D. WATSON","rationale":"Current disability of urinary incontinence established.; In-service diagnosis of acute cystitis.; Conflicting VA examiner opinions; Board found initial positive opinion persuasive over negative addendum."}],"denied":[{"case_id":"A26040152","year":2026,"judge":"S. KIM","rationale":"No evidence of current diagnosis or symptoms of urinary frequency.; Service treatment records silent for complaints/diagnosis.; Duty to assist not triggered due to lack of current disability evidence.; Evidence weighs against any current urinary frequency."},{"case_id":"A26040428","year":2026,"judge":"YVETTE R. WHITE","rationale":"No evidence of requiring appliance or frequent changes; Evidence persuasively weighs against finding of symptomatology during period on appeal"},{"case_id":"A26036071","year":2026,"judge":"K. PARAKKAL","rationale":"Criteria for higher evaluations not met; Symptoms did not meet higher evaluation thresholds"}]},"how_va_rates":null,"rules":[]}}