{"page":"https://casescribe.ai/explorer/conditions/residuals-of-fractures","generated_at":"2026-10-03T18:34:30.109Z","data_as_of":{"decisions":944125,"first_year":2017,"last_year":2026,"latest_decision":"2026-04-30","cfr":"2026-10-01","m21":"2026-09-29"},"about":{"publisher":"CaseScribe AI (VA Law Explorer)","source":"Public Board of Veterans' Appeals decisions (appeals of VA decisions, not VA's first decisions), M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual, 38 CFR Parts 3 and 4.","method":"Outcomes are issue-level: each condition the Board decided in a decision counts once. Decision data is extracted by AI and can contain errors. Rates describe past appeals and do not predict any claim.","disclaimer":"For research only. CaseScribe AI is not a law firm and this is not legal advice. Verify figures against the source decisions and regulations.","attribution":"Cite as: VA Law Explorer, CaseScribe AI, with the page URL."},"data":{"condition":"Residuals of fractures","all_conditions_granted_pct":19.4,"decisions":1889,"years":"2017-2026","granted_pct":11.9,"denied_pct":22.3,"remanded_pct":64.3,"granted_on_merits_pct":34.8,"by_year":[{"year":2017,"issues":61,"granted_pct":3.3,"denied_pct":13.1,"remanded_pct":77},{"year":2018,"issues":81,"granted_pct":6.2,"denied_pct":22.2,"remanded_pct":63},{"year":2019,"issues":262,"granted_pct":8,"denied_pct":24.4,"remanded_pct":66.4},{"year":2020,"issues":346,"granted_pct":11,"denied_pct":21.7,"remanded_pct":66.2},{"year":2021,"issues":313,"granted_pct":8.6,"denied_pct":25.2,"remanded_pct":64.5},{"year":2022,"issues":282,"granted_pct":9.6,"denied_pct":19.9,"remanded_pct":68.8},{"year":2023,"issues":303,"granted_pct":12.9,"denied_pct":15.8,"remanded_pct":68.3},{"year":2024,"issues":224,"granted_pct":19.6,"denied_pct":21,"remanded_pct":57.6},{"year":2025,"issues":230,"granted_pct":13.5,"denied_pct":27.4,"remanded_pct":57},{"year":2026,"issues":78,"granted_pct":21.8,"denied_pct":28.2,"remanded_pct":46.2}],"benefit_of_doubt_in_grants_pct":67.1,"evidence_on_merits":[{"evidence":"va_exam_favorable","decisions_with":159,"granted_pct_with":58.9,"granted_pct_without":30},{"evidence":"va_exam_unfavorable","decisions_with":1176,"granted_pct_with":30.6,"granted_pct_without":48.3},{"evidence":"nexus_positive","decisions_with":192,"granted_pct_with":58,"granted_pct_without":29.5},{"evidence":"nexus_negative","decisions_with":652,"granted_pct_with":34.5,"granted_pct_without":35},{"evidence":"private_opinion","decisions_with":411,"granted_pct_with":41.1,"granted_pct_without":32.3},{"evidence":"treating_physician","decisions_with":74,"granted_pct_with":60,"granted_pct_without":33.3},{"evidence":"lay_statement","decisions_with":1397,"granted_pct_with":35.3,"granted_pct_without":32.2},{"evidence":"buddy_statement","decisions_with":43,"granted_pct_with":50,"granted_pct_without":34.3},{"evidence":"combat_service","decisions_with":161,"granted_pct_with":54.5,"granted_pct_without":32.5}],"top_reasons":{"granted":[{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":25},{"reason":"service connection established","decisions":7},{"reason":"criteria for service connection met","decisions":6},{"reason":"caused by the service-connected disability","decisions":5},{"reason":"criteria for 10 percent rating met","decisions":3},{"reason":"severance of service connection was improper","decisions":3}],"denied":[{"reason":"no current diagnosis","decisions":55},{"reason":"preponderance of the evidence against the claim","decisions":39},{"reason":"service records negative or silent","decisions":31},{"reason":"current diagnosis established","decisions":30},{"reason":"va examiner: less likely than not related to service","decisions":18},{"reason":"no in-service complaints, treatment or diagnosis","decisions":16}]},"recent_examples":{"granted":[{"case_id":"A26037150","year":2026,"judge":"J. KIRBY","rationale":"Reduction of rating requires showing of actual improvement in functioning under ordinary conditions of life and work.; AOJ failed to demonstrate sustained improvement or address practical implications of symptoms on daily life/employment.; Veteran's and wife's statements credible in establishing no … [truncated, 37 chars omitted]"},{"case_id":"26004741","year":2026,"judge":"L. B. CRYAN","rationale":"Resolving all reasonable doubt in Veteran's favor; Symptoms approximated moderately severe from July 5, 2023"},{"case_id":"A26035571","year":2026,"judge":"YVETTE R. WHITE","rationale":"Favorable finding of current disability (resolved fracture); Favorable finding of in-service incurrence (corroborated by STRs); Adequate private opinion linking condition to service; Inadequate VA opinion due to deficiencies; Reasonable doubt resolved in Veteran's favor"}],"denied":[{"case_id":"A26040479","year":2026,"judge":"MICHELLE L. KANE","rationale":"No competent evidence of current disability; Service records negative for follow-up treatment; Veteran reported no current treatment for joint pain; Failed to attend rescheduled VA examinations"},{"case_id":"26004741","year":2026,"judge":"L. B. CRYAN","rationale":"Symptoms manifested by no more than moderate symptoms prior to July 5, 2023"},{"case_id":"A26033718","year":2026,"judge":"JENNIFER WHITE","rationale":"No evidence of in-service right leg fracture.; Service treatment records noted left leg fracture, not right.; VA examinations did not identify right leg fracture or residuals."}]},"how_va_rates":null,"rules":[]}}